Introduction to Political Science

• This text serves as the introductory front matter for an open-source Political Science textbook published by OpenStax at Rice University.
• The content is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), allowing for non-commercial sharing and adaptation with proper attribution.
• OpenStax is a nonprofit educational technology initiative aimed at increasing student access to peer-reviewed, high-quality learning materials.
• The publication is supported by a wide array of major philanthropic organizations, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
• Specific legal protections are maintained for institutional trademarks, such as the Rice University and OpenStax logos, which are excluded from the Creative Commons license.

OpenStax provides free, peer-reviewed, openly licensed textbooks for introductory college and Advanced Placement® courses and low-cost, personalized courseware that helps students learn.

• The text acknowledges a diverse range of philanthropic supporters, including the Hewlett Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the National Science Foundation, who enable the creation of free educational resources.
• OpenStax promotes a model of 'free and flexible' education, offering digital tools like online highlighting and note-taking to help students create personalized study guides.
• The curriculum begins by defining politics through the lens of power, public interest, and the systematic study of who gets what, when, and how.
• A significant portion of the material focuses on individual political behavior, exploring the predictability of human choices and the influence of environmental context.
• The text outlines a comprehensive study of political ideologies, ranging from classical liberalism and social contracts to contemporary movements like fascism and religious extremism.
• The framework introduces the fundamentals of group activity, specifically how political socialization and collective dilemmas shape group decision-making.

Study where you want, what you want, when you want.

• The text outlines the structural foundations of political systems, focusing on the roles of interest groups, political parties, and the mechanics of elections.
• It details the core institutions of government, including the functional differences between parliamentary and presidential systems and the internal workings of bureaucracies.
• A significant portion is dedicated to the judiciary, exploring various legal systems, the concept of judicial review, and the necessity of due process.
• The role of the media is examined as a political institution, highlighting the impact of the changing digital landscape and declining global trust.
• The final sections transition to international relations, categorizing governing regimes and exploring theoretical worldviews like realism and liberalism.
• The curriculum addresses the challenges of collective action and the protection of civil rights within majority-minority dynamics.

The Decline of Legislative Influence

• The text outlines the structural framework of global governance, including international law and the role of the United Nations.
• It explores the influence of non-state actors and regional intergovernmental organizations in shaping global policy.
• The curriculum transitions into International Political Economy, tracing its origins from the liberal economy to the Bretton Woods institutions.
• Modern challenges in political economy are highlighted, specifically focusing on poverty, inequality, and the environmental crisis.
• OpenStax introduces its mission as a non-profit initiative aimed at breaking down barriers to knowledge through free, customizable educational resources.

Because we believe that everyone should and can have access to knowledge.

• The textbook utilizes a holistic approach that integrates subfields like comparative politics and international relations rather than treating them as silos.
• OpenStax maintains a dynamic, web-based platform allowing for periodic updates to address errors and the rapidly changing legal and political landscape.
• The curriculum focuses on political actors at all levels, from individual behaviors and beliefs to the complex interactions of states and global institutions.
• A significant emphasis is placed on diversity and inclusion, incorporating perspectives from underrepresented, oppressed, and dissenting voices alongside foundational ideas.
• The text aims to show students their personal role in civil society by connecting political concepts to their daily lives and future careers.
• Special features highlight evolving global trends, such as the rise of women in legislatures and international efforts to combat racism.

Introduction to Political Science is designed so that students will see themselves as a part of the world of politics and political science, emphasizing the role that politics and government play in students’ lives and how students can further contribute to civil society.

• The textbook utilizes modular learning outcomes to guide students and instructors in measuring subject mastery.
• Key features like 'The Changing Political Landscape' and 'Show Me the Data' focus on demographic shifts and data literacy.
• The 'What Can I Do?' and 'Meet a Professional' sections bridge academic theory with practical career skills and professional networking.
• End-of-chapter resources include section summaries, key term definitions, multiple-choice review questions, and curated reading lists.
• Senior contributing author Mark Carl Rom brings extensive experience from the U.S. House of Representatives, the GAO, and the Brookings Institution.

What Can I Do? outlines political science skills and “soft skills” connected to chapter material that are in demand in today’s job market, both within and outside the field of government and politics.

• Masaki Hidaka brings a background in public policy and communication, with specific research into media coverage of tribal gaming and internet issue publics.
• Rachel Bzostek Walker contributes expertise in international relations and Middle Eastern politics, having researched the preemptive use of force.
• The text lists a diverse group of contributing authors from various institutions who authored specific chapters on American government and politics.
• A comprehensive list of reviewers from colleges and universities across the United States ensures the academic rigor of the material.
• The contributors represent a wide geographical range of institutions, from the University of Maine to Texas A&M University-San Antonio.

She also worked as a press aide for former San Francisco mayor Willie L. Brown Jr. (and she definitely left her heart in San Francisco).

• OpenStax provides a comprehensive instructor manual featuring chapter overviews, classroom activities, and data resource links.
• A test bank of 400 questions is categorized by Bloom’s Taxonomy to help educators customize assessments for various cognitive levels.
• Verified instructor accounts are required to access sensitive materials like answer keys and test banks to maintain academic integrity.
• The Community Hubs on OER Commons allow faculty to share, upload, and download peer-created teaching materials and multimedia.
• Low-cost technology partnerships offer integrated tools designed to enhance the accessibility of high-quality learning materials.

The 400 multiple choice and true/false questions in our test bank are correlated to the six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy, allowing instructors to customize tests to support a variety of course objectives.

• Personal technology, such as smartphones, serves as a primary intersection between individual lives and government regulation or surveillance.
• Governments utilize digital platforms for diverse purposes, ranging from direct benefit distribution to total internet shutdowns during elections.
• Politics extends beyond technology to influence fundamental human experiences, including reproductive rights, marriage, and environmental safety.
• Active and informed citizen engagement is presented as the essential requirement for achieving government integrity and public-interest policies.
• Adopting the mindset of a political scientist involves using evidence-based reasoning to protect oneself from misinformation and manipulation.

Whether or not you care about politics, politics has an interest in you.

• Politics is a fundamental human condition arising from scarcity and the need to resolve conflicting beliefs and preferences.
• The term carries a dual nature, ranging from Aristotle's view of humans as 'political animals' to modern associations with manipulation and trickery.
• Adopting Harold Lasswell's definition, politics is broadly defined as the process of 'who gets what, when, how' across all social interactions.
• Political activity is not limited to government; it exists anywhere collective decisions are made, including within families and schools.
• Every political event, regardless of its unique context, can be analyzed through three core elements: rules, reality, and choices.

The Greek philosopher Aristotle argued that humans were “political animals” in that only by engaging in politics could humans reach their highest potential.

• Success in any human endeavor, especially politics, requires a deep understanding of how to use or manipulate rules to one's advantage.
• Rules are categorized into 'de jure' (formal written laws) and 'de facto' (informal practices or the 'hidden curriculum').
• Political rules regarding voting access are rarely neutral; they are often shaped by those who stand to benefit from specific turnout levels.
• Even seemingly neutral rules, such as height requirements for pilots, inherently allocate resources to some while excluding others.
• Ignorance of the rules, whether precise like chess or flexible like social norms, significantly hinders the ability to accomplish goals.

The de jure rules are the rules as they are written, the formal rules. The de facto rules are the ones actually practiced or enforced, the informal rules.

• Rules are the foundational elements of all political and social structures, ranging from family units to national immigration systems.
• Institutions are defined as sets of rules governing rights and responsibilities or organizations where collective action is rule-bound.
• Constitutions serve as the most fundamental set of rules, defining government structure, duties, and the rights of the citizenry.
• The length and format of constitutions vary wildly, from Monaco's 4,000 words to India's 150,000, with some nations relying on unwritten sources.
• The power of a constitution is not inherent in the paper itself but depends on the willingness of political actors to uphold and respect its limits.
• Political actors frequently struggle over the creation and interpretation of rules because these rules dictate the allocation of power and resources.

Constitutions are perhaps the most important set of rules in a country because, after all, they are just pieces of paper.

• Political outcomes are shaped by the interplay between established rules, objective reality, and individual choices.
• While facts are indisputable evidence of conditions, the interpretation of those facts—such as the success of an organization—remains a matter of opinion.
• Real-world factors like incumbency and campaign funding act as significant variables that influence a candidate's probability of success.
• Politics functions similarly to a game like chess, where players make strategic moves based on the current state of the board and the constraints of the rules.
• A unique and critical distinction of politics is that the participants have the power to change the rules of the game while it is still in progress.
• Political outcomes are inherently contingent and never certain, though they can be reasonably predicted by analyzing human behavior and existing constraints.

A key difference between chess and politics is that, in politics, the players themselves can change the rules of the game while they are playing.

• Public policy encompasses all decisions made by government branches—legislative, executive, and judicial—to influence human behavior.
• The public interest is a subjective concept often defined as the general welfare or what a society 'should' want rather than just what it desires.
• Power is defined as the capacity to compel individuals to act against their original inclinations or choices.
• While power itself is invisible and cannot be measured, it is manifested through visible 'accoutrements' like titles, salutes, and formal ceremonies.
• Power is partially psychological, existing to the extent that people believe someone has authority over them and act accordingly.

Power is, in part, a matter of belief: if you believe someone has power over you, they do, at least to the extent that you do what they want.

• Sovereign power represents the highest form of authority, where no external entity holds power over a state.
• In democracies like the United States, sovereignty resides with the people rather than elected officials, who can be unseated through elections or impeachment.
• The actual power of governmental institutions is determined by both de jure (legal) and de facto (practical) rules, varying from absolute monarchies to systems of checks and balances.
• The government is unique among institutions because it possesses the exclusive legal authority to use coercive power to compel behavior.
• A state is defined by four essential elements: territory, population, sovereignty, and a functioning government.
• States can be categorized by their primary functions or methods of control, such as police states that repress dissent or welfare states that provide social benefits.

If you break your family’s rules, your family can punish you, but only your government can imprison you for breaking government laws.

• All modern nations exist on a spectrum between police states and welfare states, with North Korea and Nordic countries representing the extremes.
• The terms country, state, nation, and nation-state have distinct meanings based on geography, sovereignty, and shared cultural identity.
• A nation refers to a population connected by history and culture, such as the Kurds, who may exist without a sovereign country of their own.
• Governmental authority is defined by jurisdiction and the recognition of power within specific, limited circumstances.
• Legitimacy is determined by whether authority is exercised according to institutional rules and ethical standards.
• Political struggle often centers on whether a policy's legitimacy is derived from legal enactment or from fundamental moral principles.

As a condition for passing this course, your teacher can require you to read this book but not to do their laundry.

• Conflict is an inherent part of politics driven by the scarcity of resources and the persistence of human desire.
• Differing values and beliefs regarding social issues ensure that no single political decision can satisfy all citizens.
• Politics serves as a non-violent alternative to brute force for resolving disputes over resources and morality.
• While political processes can resolve specific issues, they cannot eliminate the underlying disagreements that cause them.
• Increasing political polarization creates distrust between groups and poses a significant risk to peaceful conflict resolution.
• Bargaining is the primary mechanism through which political actors negotiate changes to the status quo.

When violence is used to solve disputes, it represents the failure of politics, or at least the deep frustration of those whose aspirations are thwarted by politics.

• Political bargaining often results in a total failure to reach an agreement, leaving the existing situation unchanged.
• Negotiations typically collapse when parties hold diametrically opposed goals, such as conflicting views on taxation.
• Those who benefit from current rules act as active winners when negotiations fail, giving them a strategic incentive to sabotage deals.
• Political change is inherently difficult because there are always stakeholders who profit from the existing problems.
• Bargaining is essentially a struggle to rewrite rules that currently favor specific groups.

Although you might see a world full of problems that obviously need to be fixed, you should always assume that there are those who benefit from the current circumstances who will work to thwart change.

• Compromise requires the ability to see gray areas and accept partial progress, but modern digital discourse often pushes individuals toward extremes.
• Successful compromise is most likely when participants share a common goal but disagree on specific details or implementation.
• Logrolling allows parties to trade items of different value to each side, resulting in an outcome where both are better off than before.
• Political outcomes are shaped by the governing rules, current realities, and the strategic choices of the negotiators involved.
• Negotiations often involve a mix of high-minded persuasion and coercive tactics like bullying or buying influence.
• While dealmaking can be criticized as 'selling out' or corrupt, it can also be framed as a pragmatic success where participants get what they value most.

Political negotiations are often a combination of high-minded principles and skullduggery.

• Political science is the systematic investigation of who gets what, when, and how, focusing on the reasons behind government decisions.
• Even in totalitarian regimes where power is concentrated, bargaining and negotiation occur among leaders and advisors.
• Political scientists utilize theory, logic, and evidence to answer questions and make predictions, similar to other scientific disciplines.
• While some seek universal laws of political behavior, most focus on identifying patterns rather than deterministic outcomes.
• The field examines the reciprocal relationship between individual influence on government and the impact of government decisions on individuals.

Political scientists may not have lab coats or electron microscopes, but like other types of scientists, they use theory, logic, and evidence in an attempt to answer questions, to make predictions, or to arrive at conclusions.

• Political science can be used both to improve government institutions and to manipulate or suppress vulnerable populations.
• Unlike physics, politics lacks universal laws because human behavior is rarely constant across all conditions.
• Political science is probabilistic rather than deterministic, focusing on what is likely to happen rather than what must happen.
• The 'scientific' nature of the field is defined by its adherence to the scientific method rather than the discovery of unchanging laws.
• Researchers use systematic data collection and hypothesis testing to find evidence-based answers to political questions.

If one defines science as a body o f universal laws about an unchanging universe , then politics is not and cannot be a science.

• Scientific findings in politics are inherently tentative and subject to change as methods improve or new data emerges.
• Political behavior is unique because it can adapt and change once individuals learn about the theories describing their actions.
• The field is divided into two primary branches: normative political science (theory) and empirical political science.
• Normative political science focuses on defining the 'good' and the 'right,' seeking to understand the purposes and goals of political life.
• Political philosophers address fundamental questions regarding social justice, the ideal constitution, and the definition of a good citizen.
• Unlike empirical studies, normative questions cannot be resolved through evidence alone or definitive scientific testing.

The specific knowledge ('politicians in this situation will behave in that way') may become obsolete even if a broader general principle ('politicians will act strategically to advance their goals') still appears to be true.

• Normative political science relies on logic and reason rather than empirical evidence to define ideal political concepts.
• The definition of a 'good citizen' is a central debate, often contrasting those who strictly obey laws with those who challenge injustice.
• Theorists generally categorize civic goodness through three lenses: the consequences of behavior, adherence to moral rules, or personal virtue.
• One consequentialist view posits that good citizens are those whose actions, like voting or paying taxes, directly benefit the stability of society.
• Aristotle argued that just constitutions must aim for the common advantage rather than the personal gain of the rulers.

Is a good citizen the one who always obeys the laws or the one who challenges the laws they see as unjust?

• Normative political science evaluates politics through three primary lenses: consequences, universal rules, and inherent virtues.
• The consequentialist approach struggles with defining and weighing benefits against harms, such as the trade-off between personal pleasure and public risk.
• Rule-based ethics attempt to establish universal moral principles, yet face dilemmas when lying or deception might be necessary for national security.
• Virtue ethics focus on the character of citizens and governments, arguing that actions should be taken because they are inherently 'good' rather than just beneficial.
• Empirical political science shifts the focus from 'what should be' to 'what is,' relying on verifiable facts to describe, explain, and predict political behavior.

Does a good government not, as a rule, have an obligation to do just that? But does this then create a slippery slope in which governments believe they are justified in lying as a matter of course?

• Empirical political science relies on the scientific method to answer questions through factual evidence and data analysis.
• While political science historically relied on repeated observations, such as election cycles, it is increasingly utilizing true experiments.
• Determining facts can be difficult due to the complexity of variables or the secrecy of actors, such as in cases of foreign election interference.
• A correct factual reality exists for empirical questions, even when current evidence is insufficient to reach a universal consensus.
• Motivated reasoning often leads individuals to decide on a truth first and then selectively filter evidence to support their preconceived biases.

Humans often use motivated reasoning, first deciding what is true—for example, “Gun control makes us safer” or “Gun control makes us less safe”—and then finding evidence that supports this belief while rejecting data that contradicts it.

• Motivated reasoning involves seeking evidence to support pre-determined conclusions rather than building conclusions from evidence.
• Self-interest often drives individuals or corporations, such as Big Tobacco, to deny clear facts to protect profits.
• The persistence of claims regarding 2020 election fraud despite a lack of evidence illustrates a refusal to accept empirical reality.
• Empirical political science focuses on observable data, such as the correlation between education levels and voting patterns.
• Unlike normative political science, empirical study avoids making moral judgments about whether observed behaviors are 'good' or 'bad'.
• Empirical findings allow scientists to make predictions about future behavior without prescribing how society 'should' function.

The evidence is also clear that Big Tobacco, the largest cigarette companies, denied these facts for years because to admit them would have put their profits at risk.

• Empirical political science relies on factual statements about group behavior rather than normative judgments of value or desert.
• Generalizations describe typical cases and average results, such as the observation that older adults vote at higher rates than younger ones.
• A significant risk of using generalizations is the tendency to lapse into stereotyping individuals based on group-level data.
• While empirical data allows for political predictions, these forecasts are prone to error due to factors like dishonest polling responses or low voter turnout.
• The 2016 U.S. presidential election serves as a primary example of how political science models can fail to predict specific outcomes despite accurate popular vote data.
• The principle of ceteris paribus, or 'all other things being equal,' is essential for isolating specific variables in political analysis.

In using generalizations, it is important to remember that they are descriptive of groups, not individuals.

• While theoretical models often assume 'all other things are equal,' real-world political outcomes are heavily influenced by correlated inequalities in wealth, health, and education.
• Empirical political science focuses on observable data, while normative political science addresses moral arguments about how the political system should function.
• Empirical research is frequently driven by normative concerns, such as identifying systemic disadvantages to advocate for their reduction or elimination.
• The 2020 US Senate split demonstrates how a single vote, such as the Vice President's tie-breaking power, can radically shift the balance of political control.
• The election of Kamala Harris marked a historic shift in the American political landscape as the first woman and person of color to hold the tie-breaking vote in the Senate.

If empirical research discovers that certain groups are systematically disadvantaged in the political process, the researchers may also argue that these disadvantages are harmful or wrong and make a moral argument that the disadvantages should be reduced or eliminated.

• The study of politics begins at the micro-level by analyzing individual human behavior and decision-making processes.
• Human behavior in politics is driven by a tension between instrumental rationality and expressive emotional needs.
• Political ideology serves as a systematic framework that connects individual beliefs to broader social and group identities.
• Human rights are categorized into individual civil liberties and collective civil rights, both of which face frequent political disputes.
• Political participation ranges from voting to information consumption, though passive consumption is often critiqued as mere hobbyism.

Two ideas stand out. First, humans act instrumentally, or strategically or “rationally,” as they pursue their goals. Second, much of human behavior serves expressive and emotional ends.

• Individual political opinions are aggregated into group categories to create valid measures of public opinion.
• Political participation bridges individual behavior and group identity through parties, interest groups, and social movements.
• Political socialization is the gradual process of developing a political personality influenced by family, friends, and social networks.
• Political culture represents the shared attitudes and behaviors that characterize a specific country or community.
• Collective dilemmas arise when group members disagree on solutions or the decision-making process itself.
• Collective action problems occur when individual incentives discourage cooperation, even if the group would benefit from working together.

Collective action problems—exists when individuals have incentives not to cooperate with others even though cooperation would benefit the group as a whole.

• Civil rights require proactive government action and infrastructure, such as polling places and ballot counters, to be effectively realized.
• The extension or withdrawal of rights is typically targeted at specific demographic groups, making them subjects of intense political debate.
• Interest groups and political parties are inextricably linked, with the former seeking to influence policy and the latter seeking to gain office.
• Political science is fundamentally the study of interactions between actors and the resolution of conflicts through communication.
• The discipline equips students with transferable communication skills, such as translating complex data into meaningful conclusions for non-experts.

Because governments must take action for civil rights to be realized, they are matters of intense political debate.

• Institutions are defined as sets of rules and practices that govern how members of a group interact, ranging from informal families to formal governments.
• Legislatures serve as the law-making bodies of a state, existing as either unicameral or bicameral systems depending on the country.
• The executive branch, led by a president or prime minister, manages the government through a cabinet and a bureaucracy that executes daily functions.
• Judicial institutions interpret and apply laws, with their power often tied to their level of political independence from other branches.
• The news media is frequently characterized as the 'fourth branch' of government due to its significant role in the political system.

The courts and the judges or justices are more powerful when they are politically independent.

• The news media has evolved from traditional outlets to a decentralized 'fourth branch' where anyone with a smartphone can influence political discourse.
• Social media platforms have introduced unprecedented speed and scope for the spread of misinformation, challenging the democratic necessity of a factual press.
• Political regimes are categorized by the concentration of power, ranging from democratic distribution to authoritarian concentration.
• Structural governance varies between unitary systems with centralized authority and federal systems with shared national and state powers.
• International relations are shaped by diverse perspectives such as realism, liberalism, and constructivism to explain how countries wield power.
• Global stability relies on international organizations and alliances to manage collective dilemmas and threats from non-state actors like cartels and terrorists.

Today, with the rise of social media platforms that allow users to share and stream videos, images, and text, the news media is almost literally anyone with a smartphone and internet access.

• International Political Economy (IPE) identifies the winners and losers in the distribution of resources and the tactics used to maintain positions.
• Politics is defined as the process by which societies resolve disagreements over scarce resources and differing preferences.
• Political outcomes are determined by three key factors: the rules of the system, the reality of the environment, and the choices made by actors.
• The classroom can be viewed as a political environment where power, legitimacy, and consent dictate the allocation of grades.
• Current global crises regarding poverty, inequality, and environmental degradation present stark choices for both winners and losers.

Classrooms raise questions regarding power, legitimacy, and consent.

• Public policy represents the primary output of politics, often framed by actors as serving the public interest rather than self-interest.
• Power is defined as the ability to influence others' actions, with sovereign power being the highest form where an actor is ruled by no one else.
• Political science utilizes the scientific method to systematically study political phenomena through logic, reason, and verifiable evidence.
• The field remains inherently tentative, acknowledging that conclusions must be revised as new data or techniques emerge.
• Normative political science, or political philosophy, addresses fundamental questions of morality and purpose that cannot be answered by empirical data alone.

Power is the ability of one political actor to get other actors to do things they would not otherwise choose to do or not to take actions they otherwise would.

• Empirical political science focuses on how the political world actually functions through evidence and measurement rather than how it should work.
• Researchers seek to establish probabilistic generalizations that allow for the description, explanation, and prediction of political behavior.
• Political analysis follows a micro-to-macro framework, starting with individuals as the fundamental building blocks of all political action.
• Individual behaviors aggregate into groups, which become formal institutions like legislatures, courts, and bureaucracies when governed by set rules.
• The study of politics extends to international relations, covering global interactions regarding war, peace, and the international political economy.
• Key concepts such as collective action problems and bargaining illustrate the inherent tensions between individual incentives and group benefits.

Nothing happens in politics unless individuals are engaged in political activity.

• Politics is fundamentally defined as the process of determining 'who gets what, where, when, and how' through the allocation of scarce resources.
• Political science is divided into empirical study, which tests hypotheses based on evidence, and normative study, which explores ideal goals and philosophy.
• Institutions serve as the structural framework of society, utilizing rules and practices to inform how members interact and relate to one another.
• Power is characterized as the specific ability to compel individuals to perform actions they would not otherwise choose to do.
• A state is defined as a specific geographic area governed by a unified political authority that holds sovereignty over its domain.

politics “who gets what, where, when, and how”—the process for resolving disputes and allocating scarce resources

• The text outlines foundational concepts in political science, distinguishing between normative reasoning—focused on logic and virtue—and empirical science, which seeks to explain and predict.
• Key definitions are explored through multiple-choice questions, identifying legitimacy as the highest form of political power and the status quo as the current state of affairs.
• Methodological principles are highlighted, noting that political science is typically probabilistic rather than deterministic and relies on tentative hypotheses about reality.
• The scope of the field includes the study of individual behavior as the basis for all political action and the recognition of the media as the 'fourth branch' of government.
• The material introduces diverse theoretical perspectives for understanding international relations, including realism, constructivism, and feminism.

Political science is usually probabilistic.

• International conflicts, such as those in the South China Sea, are fundamentally driven by the individual behaviors and decisions of political leaders and citizens.
• Understanding politics requires looking beyond observable actions to discern the underlying moral aspirations and visions of how the world should be structured.
• Political action is motivated by a combination of material self-interest and normative principles regarding justice and social rules.
• Normative political theory uses logic and persuasion to explore what people should do, rather than just describing what they currently do.
• The study of politics must bridge the gap between empirical observations of 'down-and-dirty' actions and the philosophical 'lofty dreams' of political philosophy.

Politics involves both lofty dreams and down-and-dirty actions.

• Political theorists debate whether human rights are inherent discoveries of nature or social inventions created by human action.
• The United Nations defines human rights as inalienable and universal, existing simply because one is human rather than being granted by a state.
• A social constructionist view argues that rights are not like gravity; they require active political creation and protection to exist in reality.
• A third perspective suggests rights are inherent but often ignored, placing a moral obligation on political actors to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
• The text distinguishes between civil liberties, which protect individuals from government interference, and civil rights, which are often affirmed for specific marginalized groups.

In this view, unlike gravity, which exerts its force whether or not humans recognize it, political action is necessary to create and protect human rights.

• Human rights are foundational to international law and organizations like the United Nations, which promotes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
• Social justice is broadly defined as the equitable or fair distribution of opportunities, resources, and rights within a society.
• Utilitarianism posits that a just society is one that maximizes 'net happiness,' calculated by subtracting total unhappiness from total happiness.
• Governments apply utilitarian principles through cost-benefit analysis to determine if the social and financial benefits of a policy outweigh its costs.
• A major critique of utilitarianism is the difficulty of measuring happiness, as seen in complex trade-offs like environmental preservation versus human displacement.
• Libertarianism opposes utilitarianism by arguing that individual liberties must never be violated, even if doing so would increase the overall happiness of the majority.

As with human rights, it is worth asking whether such a thing as social justice actually exists, or whether, in the words of the philosopher Friedrich Hayek, social justice is a 'mirage.'

• Utilitarianism may justify wealth redistribution if it increases the net happiness of society.
• Libertarians reject redistribution on the grounds that it violates individual property rights regardless of social benefit.
• From a libertarian perspective, government actions like taxation and environmental regulations are viewed as forms of theft.
• Libertarians argue that social justice is achieved only through a system that maximizes individual liberty and protects private property.
• A libertarian state would limit government functions to essential services like police and military, leaving education and healthcare to the open market.

A libertarian would respond that almost any action by governments or individuals that deprives us of our liberty or property is thievery.

• Marxism defines social justice through the equitable distribution of resources based on individual needs rather than market demand.
• The theory rejects capitalism as a coercive system where the means of production are privately owned and the working class is exploited for profit.
• Marx argued that the state is not a neutral arbiter but a machine used by the capitalist class to oppress labor and protect private interests.
• A truly just society requires a radical revolution to eliminate class distinctions, eventually making formal government unnecessary.
• While few countries remain officially communist, Marxist principles continue to influence global politics through socialist and labor parties.

the State is nothing more than a machine for the oppression of one class by another.

• John Rawls proposed a theory of justice based on the 'veil of ignorance,' where rational individuals design a society without knowing their own status within it.
• Under this framework, rational actors would prioritize equal basic liberties to avoid the risk of being part of a deprived or oppressed group.
• The 'difference principle' suggests that social and economic inequalities are only permissible if they benefit the least advantaged members of society.
• Rawls’s logical framework mirrors the 'Golden Rule' found in many world religions, emphasizing fairness and reciprocal treatment.
• African American leaders like Booker T. Washington and Martin Luther King Jr. shifted the focus from theoretical definitions of justice to the practical pursuit of institutional reform.
• The lived experiences of these activists in a discriminatory society highlighted the gap between national ideals of liberty and the reality of racial inequality.

In designing it, you would be operating from behind a 'veil of ignorance.'

• Booker T. Washington emphasized Black empowerment through property ownership, industry, and character as the foundation for freedom.
• W.E.B. Du Bois argued that full civil rights and political representation were essential preconditions for justice and universal human rights.
• Ida B. Wells utilized investigative journalism to document lynching and expose it as a systemic tool of racial oppression.
• Martin Luther King Jr. viewed the struggle for equality as a radical challenge to the structural flaws of racism, poverty, and militarism.
• King advocated for a total reconstruction of society to address systemic rather than superficial social ills.

The black revolution is much more than a struggle for the rights of Negroes. It is forcing America to face all its interrelated flaws—racism, poverty, militarism, and materialism.

• Mohandas Gandhi's vision for a just society integrated political science, spirituality, and ethics through a nonviolent framework.
• Unlike many Western philosophers, Gandhi prioritized human duties over rights, defining civilization as the path of duty.
• Gandhi advocated for a minimalist government and resource allocation based on individual need rather than accumulation.
• Most dominant theories of social justice, including utilitarianism and Marxism, originate from Western male perspectives.
• Western theories typically center on the individual, whereas non-Western and feminist critiques suggest these universal claims may marginalize alternative goals.
• While Western concepts like Rawlsian justice influence U.S. policy, they are often accused of being exported to cultures where they may not fit.

Civilization is that mode of conduct that points out to man the path of duty.

• African and communitarian scholars argue that true social justice prioritizes the community over the individual, emphasizing social solidarity and cultural rights.
• Islamic principles of justice reject Western individualism, positing that justice is achieved by following divine guidance and fulfilling the purpose of worshipping God.
• Feminist scholars critique traditional Western political philosophy for justifying the subordination of women and ignoring gendered experiences of oppression.
• The purpose of government is a contested topic, with Thomas Hobbes famously arguing that its primary role is to provide security and escape a 'brutish' state of nature.
• Modern visions of justice include a collective obligation to provide for essential human needs and ensure that all people are included in the decision-making process.

For Hobbes, then, the principal purpose of government would be to remove the people from the state of nature and to promote their security.

• Thomas Hobbes proposed that governments arise through a metaphorical social contract where individuals trade personal freedoms for collective security.
• John Locke viewed the social contract as a mechanism to protect God-given rights to life, health, liberty, and possessions from potential disputes.
• David Hume expanded the role of government to include the provision of public goods that individuals lack the incentive to produce privately.
• Public goods are defined as resources that benefit everyone, cannot be withheld from individuals, and are not depleted by use.
• To fund these public goods, Hume argued that governments must possess the authority to impose taxes and provide incentives to the citizenry.

First, the individuals involved decide to collectively give up some of the freedoms they had in the state of nature, such as the freedom to commit violence against each other.

• The social contract requires citizens to exchange specific liberties and resources for government-provided protection and public goods.
• A fundamental challenge in political design is balancing the desire for total freedom with the necessity of social order.
• While the US Constitution's preamble outlines idealistic goals like justice and liberty, these protections were historically denied to women, Native Americans, and Black people.
• The gap between a nation's foundational documents and its actual practice is often wide, as seen in the Confederate States' adoption of similar constitutional language.
• Constitutions are products of human authors influenced by personal economic interests, class biases, and competing ideological beliefs rather than objective ideals.

Constitutions are not written by angels: they are written and implemented by groups of individuals who have their own self-interests and biases as well as their own view of the common good.

• Historical evidence suggests government officials prioritize expanding their own power over the public interest.
• President Recep Erdoğan serves as a case study for consolidating authority under the guise of national security.
• The COVID-19 pandemic provided a global pretext for many regimes to demand obedience and curtail individual rights.
• Citizens often voluntarily trade liberty for security when faced with perceived external or internal threats.
• While some state actions are made in good faith, power expansion typically benefits the rulers rather than the ruled.

History is replete with evidence that the actual purposes of those serving in government align most with preserving or expanding their power, even though they may claim they are acting in the public interest.

• The spectrum of governance ranges from absolute rule by a single individual to collective decision-making by all citizens.
• Authoritarian regimes often justify their power through claims of divinity, virtue, or the unique ability of a single party to represent the people's will.
• Democratic theory centers on the concept of 'we, the people,' yet countries vary significantly in how they define who is included in that collective.
• Most modern democracies function as representative systems rather than direct ones due to practical logistical constraints and concerns over voter expertise.
• Critics of democracy argue that it can devolve into 'mob rule,' where an uninformed majority might exploit minorities or make unwise public decisions.
• The 2016 Turkish coup attempt serves as a modern example of how leaders may use political instability as a pretext to consolidate personal power.

Since antiquity, political philosophers and practitioners have worried that democracy will inevitably become mob rule, with citizens who—rather than make wise decisions in the public interest—seek to exploit minorities, rob the wealthy, and otherwise favor policies and leaders who are nasty and brutish.

• Political philosophy provides theoretical frameworks for justice and rights, but actual political practice is determined by the behavior of real people.
• Political psychology is a specialized subfield that examines the mental processes influencing why individuals engage in or withdraw from political activity.
• The 1950 study 'The Authoritarian Personality' remains a foundational text, linking childhood character traits to a preference for ultranationalist and fascist leaders.
• Social science aims to describe, explain, predict, and change behavior, goals that political science adopts within the realm of governance.
• Because human behavior is as unique as a fingerprint, researchers must simplify complex individual actions to identify broader patterns in decision-making.
• Human political choices are categorized into instrumental (strategic) and noninstrumental (expressive) motivations.

It tries to answer questions like 'What makes a fascist? Are there character traits that make someone more likely to vote for the far right?'

• Empirical political science distinguishes between directly observable behaviors and the indirectly observable mental processes that drive them.
• Human decision-making is divided into 'thinking fast' (intuitive and reflexive) and 'thinking slow' (deliberate and cognitively demanding).
• Political actors often rely on fast thinking and snap judgments to avoid the high energy cost of slow, reflective analysis.
• In political science, 'rationality' is strictly defined as being self-interested, strategic, and calculating in pursuit of personal goals.
• An 'irrational' person in this context is defined as someone who is not primarily motivated by strategic self-interest or the maximization of their own well-being.

In political science, rational does not simply mean reasonable, and irrational does not simply mean rash or lacking in good judgement.

• Humans are predictably irrational, often failing to act in their own best interest regarding health, finances, and education.
• Voters frequently bypass complex analysis of candidates in favor of heuristics, which are cognitive shortcuts used to make decisions quickly.
• While average citizens often rely on intuition, skillful political actors are typically rational and strategic in their pursuit of specific goals.
• Successful politicians exploit the human tendency for noncognitive decision-making to manipulate public behavior.
• The 'thinking fast' mechanism simplifies the world but leaves individuals vulnerable to misinformation and appeals to emotion rather than logic.

Politicians, seeking your support, are less likely to appeal to your head than to your (metaphorical) heart.

• Strategic action is defined as choosing the most effective means to achieve a specific end, independent of moral considerations.
• Even simple goals are complicated by multiple dimensions, such as whether a politician should persuade new voters or mobilize existing ones.
• Success is often hindered by imperfect information, inaccurate calculations of cause and effect, and inherent personal biases.
• The principle of 'ceteris paribus' suggests that while strategy is decisive between equals, superior resources can still outweigh superior planning.
• In competitive environments like politics or chess, the success of one's strategy is fundamentally dependent on the strategic responses of an opponent.

Note that acting strategic ally do es not necessarily imply acting morally . Acting strategic ally is quite simply choosing the mos t eff ectiv e means to achieve a specific end .

• Political strategy requires players to anticipate and react to the potential moves of their opponents rather than acting in isolation.
• Strategic action is not inherently ethical, as political actors often resort to corruption, intimidation, or social media manipulation to gain an advantage.
• A political system's quality can be measured by its ability to prevent and mitigate deceptive or corrupt strategic behaviors.
• Human behavior is also driven by expressive activities, which are performed to convey emotions or identity rather than to achieve a specific external goal.
• Expressive actions serve as social signals that shape how others perceive an individual's character and values.

Acting strategically does not necessarily mean acting ethically.

• Political behavior is often driven by how individuals want to appear to others rather than just what they want to accomplish strategically.
• Party identification is more closely linked to expressive choices and identity than to calculated strategic goals.
• Voting serves a dual purpose: it is a strategic act to elect a candidate and a social signal of a person's character.
• Humans balance narrow biological selfishness with broader social desires for material goods, power, and fame.
• Political support is frequently based on perceived personal benefits, which can be tangible like lower taxes or intangible like social prestige.
• Leaders often leverage intangible benefits, such as national pride or respect, to mobilize supporters beyond specific policy platforms.

Much behavior is predicated on how people want to appear, not just (or mainly) what they want to accomplish, and this is as true in politics as it is on Instagram.

• Political behavior often deviates from simple personal or material self-interest.
• Advocacy for endangered species or flag-burning bans provides no direct material gain to the actors involved.
• Intense political debates frequently center on symbolic and cultural issues rather than resource distribution.
• Political contests are fundamentally about competing visions for the identity and future of a nation.
• Strategic decision-making, such as during the Cuban Missile Crisis, involves modeling complex outcomes beyond immediate gain.

The contest is less about who gets what and more about what kind of country people want to live in.

• Political behavior is inherently interpretive because external actions like voting do not reveal the internal motivations of the individual.
• Effective communication and the ability to interpret the behavior of others are critical skills, especially in high-stakes geopolitical scenarios like the Cuban Missile Crisis.
• Human decision-making fluctuates between self-interest and public-spiritedness depending on the social context of the choice.
• It is currently impossible to directly observe the mental factors influencing behavioral choices, making it difficult to distinguish between altruism and misguided self-interest.
• People often engage in self-deception, convincing themselves their motives are public-spirited when they may actually be self-serving.
• While consumer choices are often dominated by self-interest, communal activities in families or organizations frequently require prioritizing the collective good.

People are pretty good at fooling themselves regarding their own motives.

• Political behavior is rarely driven by pure self-interest; it often involves strategic support for causes and expressive desires to affirm one's identity.
• While individual actions are unique, human behavior in aggregate is not random and follows predictable patterns under specific conditions.
• Political scientists utilize demographic data, such as age and education, to forecast voting likelihood and party preference.
• The predictability of political actors allows for empirical study, similar to how commercial algorithms like Netflix forecast consumer preferences.
• Politicians generally act to increase their political power, a consistent behavior that enables reliable modeling by researchers.

More likely, BLM allies—or the supporters of any social movement, whether conservative or liberal, democratic or authoritarian—join because they support the cause that the movement represents (a strategic reason) and because they want to show that they are the kind of person that supports this movement (an expressive reason).

• Voter turnout rates in the United States are consistently linked to age, with the highest participation among those 65 and older.
• Political analysts use historical data to predict future group behaviors and help campaigns allocate resources effectively.
• Predictions are probabilistic and apply to groups with shared characteristics rather than specific individuals.
• The accuracy of behavioral predictions is limited by imperfect information and the inherent complexity of human decision-making.
• Human behavior contains an element of randomness similar to a coin flip, making individual outcomes impossible to guarantee.
• High-stakes historical events, like the Cuban Missile Crisis, illustrate the unpredictable nature of individual leadership decisions.

Whether a single flip comes up heads or tails is random. If you predict the outcome correctly, you just got lucky.

• The resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis is attributed more to luck and human choice than to predictable data patterns.
• Political polling remains fallible because it cannot accurately measure actual voter turnout or final decision-making in the voting booth.
• Data scientist Dennis Quinn suggests that students should focus on acquiring technical skills like Python and R to create their own roles within organizations.
• Quinn emphasizes that while undergraduate education teaches students how to argue, it often fails to teach them how to create original data.
• The text highlights a shift in political science toward computational methodologies, including data mining and machine learning.

It was just luck that [Kennedy and Kruschev] finally acted before they lost control, and before East and West were involved in nuclear war that would have led to destruction of nations.

• Differentiating oneself in the workforce requires moving beyond basic knowledge to active knowledge generation through tools like programming or econometrics.
• Political science provides a unique advantage by teaching students how to identify the right questions, which is the first step in problem-solving.
• Military and political leaders manage uncertainty by manipulating incentives, raising the costs of defection while promoting expressive values like loyalty.
• Motivated reasoning leads individuals to believe their own political side is public-spirited while viewing opponents as self-interested or immoral.
• Research indicates that both Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. tend to view the opposing party as less intelligent, moral, or patriotic.
• Political participation is rarely driven by a single motive; individuals on all sides generally possess a similar mix of self-interest and public spirit.

The wise military strategist will adopt the strategies believed to increase the probability—the predictability—that the soldier will remain faithful to their side.

• Political scientists use game theory to interpret human behavior by analyzing rules, choices, and actual decisions.
• The Ultimatum Game involves Player A offering a portion of a sum to Player B, who can either accept the split or reject it entirely.
• If Player B rejects the offer, both players receive nothing, creating a 'take it or leave it' scenario that tests social dynamics.
• Purely rational actors would theoretically offer and accept the smallest possible amount, such as $1, rather than walk away empty-handed.
• In practice, human behavior often deviates from pure rationality, leaning toward either cooperative 50-50 splits or altruistic considerations.
• The game serves as a tool to observe how real-world circumstances and intuition influence strategic decision-making.

If Player B rejects the offer, neither player keeps any money.

• Experimental data from the ultimatum game reveals that humans are not purely self-interested and often prioritize fairness over financial gain.
• Players frequently reject offers that deviate significantly from a 50-50 split as a way to punish those who violate social norms of fairness.
• Strategic factors such as uncertainty, repeat interactions, and face-to-face contact increase the likelihood of fair offers being made.
• The perceived value of a prize influences behavior, as individuals are less likely to reject unfair offers when the absolute monetary stakes are extremely high.
• While the ultimatum game provides a model for bargaining, real-world politics is far more complex due to shifting rules, multiple players, and the use of threats or deception.

For these players, those who violate fairness must be punished.

• Political philosophy explores fundamental questions regarding human rights, social justice, and the purpose of government, though no universal consensus exists.
• Definitions of social justice vary significantly across ideologies, ranging from Marxist class equality and Rawlsian rational choice to perspectives from feminist and non-Western scholars.
• In practice, the actual application of rights and justice is determined by those in power rather than by abstract philosophical ideals.
• Human decision-making is divided into 'fast' automatic judgments and 'slow' effortful reasoning, with most people relying on the former due to the cognitive difficulty of the latter.
• Political actions are driven by either strategic motives to achieve specific goals or expressive motives to signal identity and values.
• Individual political behavior often blends personal self-interest with broader community goals, as actors frequently view their own success as beneficial to the public interest.

Those who rule a country ultimately determine what the actual purposes of the government will be, what kinds of justice the country will embrace, and what rights will be protected for those living there.

• While every human is unique, behavior remains partially predictable by analyzing characteristics and past actions of similar individuals.
• Predictions often fail due to inaccurate data, shifting future behaviors, or the influence of motivated reasoning.
• Motivated reasoning acts as a cognitive bias where individuals prioritize desired conclusions over neutral evidence evaluation.
• Political scientists utilize game theory to model human decisions, treating political actions as strategic choices made under specific rules.
• The context of a 'game,' such as the size of a prize or the relationship between players, significantly alters how rational or irrational an individual acts.
• Key political concepts like civil liberties and human rights define the boundaries within which these strategic political games are played.

Motivated reasoning is a form of bias that leads individuals to arrive at conclusions that they want to believe in rather than to scrutinize the evidence neutrally.

• The text defines foundational political philosophies including Marxism, which seeks equitable resource distribution, and utilitarianism, which aims to maximize collective happiness.
• It outlines the social contract as a trade-off where individuals sacrifice specific freedoms in exchange for communal protection.
• Human cognition in politics is characterized by 'motivated reasoning,' the tendency to favor information that confirms existing beliefs while dismissing contradictory evidence.
• Rational behavior is defined as strategic action taken by individuals to maximize their own well-being based on their personal definitions of success.
• Empirical political research focuses on making predictions about human behavior and explaining the underlying nature of political systems.
• Public goods are identified as non-excludable resources that benefit all members of a society without being depleted by individual use.

motivated reasoning the human tendency to embrace ideas that we want to believe while rejecting evidence that challenges those beliefs

• The text concludes a section on game theory and decision-making, highlighting how choices vary based on situational contexts.
• A comprehensive list of suggested readings spans behavioral economics, feminist theory, and political philosophy.
• The introduction to Chapter 3 focuses on the evolution of Western political ideologies and the social contract.
• Venezuela is presented as a modern case study of a country in extreme crisis, suffering from severe shortages of food and water.
• The Maduro administration faces international condemnation for human rights violations, including extrajudicial executions and torture.
• The humanitarian disaster has resulted in a massive migration crisis, with over 15 percent of the Venezuelan population fleeing the country.

The UN Human Rights Council cited Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro’s administration for crimes against humanity, including extrajudicial executions, police brutality, and torture.

• Venezuela's history illustrates how competing political ideologies attempt to manage vast oil wealth and economic structure.
• The transition to socialist ideology under Hugo Chávez aimed to redistribute wealth but eventually led to sharp economic decline and hyperinflation.
• Current debates center on whether Venezuela's crisis stems from socialist ideology itself or external sanctions from hostile nations.
• The global political landscape is currently defined by intense friction between socialism, liberalism, conservative populism, and religious extremism.
• Modern political ideologies are rooted in a historical evolution of Western thought dating back to classical Greek philosophers like Plato and Aristotle.

In many parts of the world, ideological flux defines political life, with contests between and among socialism, liberalism and neoliberalism, the center left, conservative populism, religious extremism, and a range of other ideological visions.

• The origins of Western political philosophy are rooted in fifth-century BCE Athens, focusing on how society should be organized.
• Socrates championed the use of reason and rigorous criticism to determine fundamental truths about life and behavior.
• Plato, a student of Socrates, argued in The Republic that political power should be held by individuals with exceptional skill and wisdom.
• Plato proposed that 'philosopher-kings' should possess unrestricted power because their knowledge of truth would prevent corruption.
• The ultimate goal of a government led by wise and benevolent rulers, according to Plato, is the achievement of true justice.

Plato believed that philosophers best fit this bill and should hold unrestricted political power.

• Aristotle identified monarchy and aristocracy as ideal forms of rule, provided the leaders prioritize the common good over personal gain.
• The philosopher warned that concentrated power often devolves into tyranny or oligarchy when rulers serve their own interests.
• Aristotle proposed the 'Politeia' as a stable form of government where a large middle class holds power and respects the rule of law.
• Political participation is viewed as essential for human development, as it requires the exercise of rational debate and judgment.
• Modern thinkers like James Fishkin argue that technology can now facilitate the large-scale deliberation Aristotle envisioned for the public good.

To reach one’s full potential as a human, one must participate in the exercise of political power that is structured around debate and deliberation concerning the common good of society.

• Aristotelian thought emphasizes that extreme income inequality undermines the common good, positioning the middle class as the essential backbone of a stable nation.
• Aristotle argued that government must actively cultivate citizen virtues like wisdom and courage by regulating social institutions and education.
• Early Christian political thought, exemplified by Tertullian, prioritized biblical revelation and divine authority over human reason as the foundation of the state.
• Thomas Hobbes shifted the focus of political legitimacy from religious glorification to the pragmatic maintenance of social peace and safety.
• Hobbes proposed the 'social contract,' where individuals trade absolute freedom for security under a 'Leviathan' to avoid the chaos of the state of nature.

In the absence of any political authority—what Hobbes called the state of nature—following the laws of nature would make a person vulnerable to attacks from those who did not follow them.

• John Locke redefined the state of nature as a realm governed by moral rules discoverable through human reason.
• Unlike Hobbes, Locke argued that natural laws impose moral obligations on everyone regardless of government enforcement.
• Natural rights, such as the right to life, create reciprocal duties for others to respect those rights.
• Locke posited that individuals have moral duties to themselves, including the prohibition of suicide and the cultivation of personal talents.
• Property rights are established by mixing one's physical labor with the land, provided it does not harm the prosperity of others.

Locke argued that individuals in the state of nature would be entitled to own land only if they mixed it with what they inherently owned—their bodies and their bodies’ labor.

• Locke argued that unequal land ownership in a state of nature benefits society by incentivizing the production of valued goods.
• The introduction of money and wage labor allows for a commercial society that raises the standard of living for everyone, including the landless.
• Despite potential prosperity, rational individuals would form a social contract to prevent chaos caused by wealth-based jealousy and vigilante justice.
• The primary purpose of government is to preserve private property and personal freedom while enforcing natural laws.
• To prevent government abuse, Locke suggested mechanisms like landowner representation to avoid arbitrary taxation.
• If a government violates natural rights, the people possess a fundamental right of revolution to depose their rulers by force.

Some would become jealous of those with more wealth, and the ability of each person to punish violations of the natural law would eventually lead to chaos.

• John Locke’s philosophy laid the foundation for the Enlightenment, prioritizing reason as the primary tool for organizing social and political life.
• Adam Smith applied Locke’s principles to economics, arguing that free trade and the removal of mercantilist barriers lead to universal prosperity.
• Smith introduced the concept of comparative advantage, suggesting nations should specialize in goods where they hold a competitive edge.
• Contrary to the protectionist views of the era, Smith maintained that a nation's wealth grows in direct proportion to its freedom of trade.
• Jean-Jacques Rousseau interpreted the 'state of nature' as a literal historical account of human development rather than a mere thought experiment.
• Rousseau posited that while humans possess natural compassion and a right to freedom, the pursuit of wealth and status has resulted in political enslavement.

Rousseau argued that “man was born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”

• Rousseau proposed that a 'civil religion' is necessary to foster a collective identity and treat fellow citizens as brothers and sisters.
• He advocated for direct assembly of the people to create laws, rather than relying solely on representatives, to ensure the laws reflect the general will.
• To prevent corruption, Rousseau argued that laws must apply universally to all citizens without any exemptions for specific groups or individuals.
• The concept of the general will aims to promote the true good of every person by reducing income inequality and cultivating civic virtue over self-interest.
• Rousseau's influence persists in modern debates, such as Thomas Jefferson's call for periodic constitutional conventions and current disputes over school vouchers.
• Critics of school vouchers echo Rousseau’s concerns, fearing that state-subsidized religious education might destabilize social cohesion and common identity.

Charismatic leaders must cultivate among the people a common religious sentiment—what Rousseau calls a civil religion—that defines citizens as brothers and sisters and teaches respect for religious differences.

• Classical liberalism integrates natural rights, limited government, and capitalism based on private property and profit.
• The ideology distinguishes between liberty and moral license, prohibiting actions that destroy the rights of others or social peace.
• As a revolutionary force, classical liberalism inspired the American Revolution and the overthrow of King James II.
• The movement evolved from property-based suffrage to broader concepts of political equality and universal voting rights.
• Key historical figures like Benjamin Franklin and John Stuart Mill shaped the transition toward modern democratic participation.

Locke would say that classical liberalism endorses liberty, but it does not endorse moral license, or the freedom to act in ways that are destructive of the rights of others, the self, or the foundations of social peace and prosperity.

• John Stuart Mill expanded classical liberalism by advocating for the full inclusion of women and the protection of unpopular speech.
• Mill introduced the harm principle, arguing that adults should be free to make choices that cause themselves personal harm as long as others are not affected.
• The Great Depression challenged classical liberal beliefs by causing massive unemployment and economic contraction, leading to a reevaluation of government's role.
• Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal introduced significant economic regulations and social welfare programs like Social Security to stabilize the economy.
• FDR argued that expanding government power to create safety nets would actually preserve individual rights by preventing more radical threats to liberty.

Liberty, he argues, should be broadened not only in matters of speech and the press but also so that the law does not restrict the freedom of adults—even if individual adults exercise their freedom in ways that cause them personal harm.

• F. A. Hayek argued that extensive state economic planning inevitably leads to invasive enforcement and the erosion of individual freedoms.
• Hayek's 'The Road to Serfdom' posits that entrenched bureaucracies avoid democratic accountability and are nearly impossible to dismantle once established.
• A command economy disrupts the price signals of a free market, leading to inefficient resource allocation and a lower standard of living.
• Nationalism is defined by a spiritual attachment to a group based on shared blood, history, and soil.
• While nationalism can drive independence movements against colonial rule, it also risks fostering beliefs in national superiority and social exclusion.

The net result, according to Hayek, would be a new form of serfdom—a condition of limited freedom, entrenched hierarchies, and generalized poverty.

• Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels criticized nationalism as a distraction from internal economic exploitation and class struggle.
• Marx envisioned a global revolution that would dismantle modern society to establish a classless communist state.
• The ultimate goal of communism was defined as a condition of peace, justice, and material equality without political supervision.
• Marx believed that removing economic classes would allow humans to realize their inherent potential for solidarity and creativity.
• In a communist society, individuals would be free from specialized labor roles, allowing them to pursue diverse interests daily.

In communist society, where . . . each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic.

• Marx and Engels argued that the internal mechanics of a free-market economy, specifically competition and labor-saving machinery, make the transition to communism inevitable.
• The drive for lower prices leads to increased unemployment and the impoverishment of the masses, eventually forcing the majority of society into the proletariat.
• Class consciousness arises when workers recognize their shared misery, leading to a violent seizure of state power known as the dictatorship of the proletariat.
• During the transition to communism, the proletariat is expected to control political speech and dismantle social norms, such as marriage, shaped by capitalism.
• Antonio Gramsci explained the failure of the expected revolution by identifying 'hegemony,' where the ruling class uses media and education to manufacture cultural consent.
• Cultural hegemony distracts the oppressed with rags-to-riches stories and conspicuous entertainment, encouraging them to view the status quo as a land of opportunity.

They manufacture a set of cultural norms through their control of the media, churches, and schools, asserting what Gramsci called hegemony, or domination by means of the prevailing culture.

• Antonio Gramsci argued that the wealthy elite maintain power through a 'hegemonic culture' that uses patriotism and religion to instill passivity in the working class.
• Gramsci proposed that a communist triumph requires capturing culture-producing institutions like schools and media to transform societal consciousness.
• Vladimir Lenin believed a revolution required a 'vanguard'—a small, dedicated group of activists to seize the state by force on behalf of the workers.
• Leninists in Russia prioritized rapid industrialization and the suppression of resistance to create the material conditions for a communist society.
• Under Joseph Stalin, the Soviet Union shifted toward 'totalitarianism,' demanding rigid ideological conformity and state control over all aspects of life.
• Stalin focused on building 'socialism in one country,' prioritizing Russian industrial and military strength over the immediate global revolution envisioned by Lenin.

A small group of dedicated activists, on the other hand, could seize power by the force of their revolutionary zeal and then act on the workers’ behalf to break the neck of the capitalist state.

• Fascism emerged in Italy and Spain during the 1920s as a response to the perceived inefficiency and fragmentation of parliamentary governments.
• The ideology centers on extreme nationalism, reverence for the state, and the consolidation of power under a single forceful leader.
• Nazism, a particularly virulent form of fascism, rejected traditional freedoms and hereditary aristocracy in favor of industrialization and state-controlled religion.
• Unlike traditional nationalism, Nazism incorporated a pseudo-scientific racial hierarchy that prioritized 'Aryans' and sought to eliminate those deemed inferior.
• The Nazi regime orchestrated the Holocaust, the most devastating genocide in human history, resulting in the systematic murder of millions.

Nazism opposed much in modern life—especially the freedoms that Germans enjoyed under the Weimar Republic (1919–1933), which Hitler found decadent.

• During the 20th century, Portugal under António Salazar adopted authoritarianism as a 'middle way' to avoid the extremes of both fascism and communism.
• Salazar’s regime permitted some economic and personal freedoms, including religious tolerance and asylum for Jews, while strictly prohibiting political challenges to the ruler.
• Modern authoritarianism in Egypt, led by Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, mirrors Salazar’s logic by claiming that the public cannot be trusted to choose appropriate leaders without risking extremism.
• The Arab Spring initially sought to dismantle authoritarian structures in the Middle East, but in many cases, it resulted in a return to unchecked military or autocratic rule.
• China remains the most prominent example of persistent communism, though Maoism adapted Marxist-Leninist theory to focus on the peasantry rather than the industrial working class.

Defenders justified the principle of authoritarian rule on the basis that the democratic selection of rulers was just too dangerous.

• Mao Zedong identified the peasantry rather than the urban proletariat as the primary agents for ushering in communism in China.
• He believed the peasants' poverty and ignorance made them uniquely malleable and open to revolutionary struggle.
• To compensate for a lack of class consciousness, Mao emphasized the necessity of a powerful vanguard party to mold the masses.
• Mao maintained a deep suspicion of urban intellectuals, leading to their persecution by Red Guard battalions during the Cultural Revolution.
• Following Mao's death, Deng Xiaoping justified economic experimentation by arguing that China was still only in the initial stages of socialism.

Mao contended that the peasants’ poverty made them miserable, their ignorance made them malleable, and their supposed natural combativeness made them open to embracing change through revolutionary struggle.

• Deng Xiaoping introduced controlled private property and free markets as a pragmatic strategy to increase economic productivity.
• The Chinese Communist Party views limited religious and economic freedoms as temporary tools to enhance life satisfaction and efficiency.
• Deng's theory posits that once productivity meets all needs, the profit-based economy and religion will disappear, leading to true human liberty.
• Current leader Xi Jinping has reaffirmed this long-term goal while simultaneously tightening state control over religion, education, and media.
• The regime promotes Confucianism and Marxist ideals to maintain social order and hierarchy while touting poverty reduction to bolster party support.

For communist states, at least in theory, the ultimate goal is liberation; repression is not an intrinsic value, only the necessary means to the desired end point of genuine human liberty.

• The 'third wave' of democratization began in the mid-1970s, transitioning nations like Portugal, Spain, and South Korea from authoritarianism to democratic systems.
• Democratic liberalism synthesizes classical liberal values, such as individual rights and capitalism, with a commitment to egalitarianism and representative governance.
• To protect minority rights from the 'tyranny of the majority,' democratic liberalism utilizes representative elections and counter-majoritarian judicial power.
• The ideology supports a mixed government structure where executive, legislative, and judicial powers are separated to prevent the consolidation of authority.
• Economically, democratic liberalism maintains a capitalist framework but advocates for state regulation and social safety nets to mitigate inequality.
• In the late 20th century, this ideology manifested as center-right and center-left movements that collectively reject socialism, communism, and fascism.

Democratic liberalism looks to the courts to exercise some measure of counter-majoritarian power, shielding minorities from abuse by numerical majorities.

• The center-right is defined by political fusionism, which blends moderate economic libertarianism with moderate social conservatism.
• Rooted in classical liberalism and the philosophy of John Stuart Mill, libertarians prioritize individual freedom of speech and personal behavior.
• Economic libertarianism advocates for minimal government regulation, lower taxes, and the elimination of income redistribution policies.
• Libertarians view the right to move labor and property across international borders as a fundamental human right.
• Under this framework, corporations have no moral obligation to maintain domestic operations if offshoring provides greater economic efficiency.
• The ideology favors permissive immigration laws to ensure a steady supply of labor for the private sector.

Loyalty to any particular state is relatively unimportant in contemporary libertarianism.

• Moderate economic libertarians accept existing government frameworks like Medicare but oppose the expansion of new programs like the Affordable Care Act.
• Social conservatism emphasizes natural law and local traditions to uphold moral standards, distinguishing liberty from the license to engage in immoral behavior.
• Moderate social conservatives may accept some expansions of personal autonomy, such as civil unions, while resisting further government support for nontraditional values.
• A key concern for social conservatives is judicial activism, which they view as judges exceeding their authority through creative constitutional interpretation.
• Originalism is the preferred judicial philosophy for these conservatives, arguing the Constitution should be interpreted based on its meaning at the time of adoption.
• Social conservatives believe state governments should have the power to regulate morality, including the restriction of pornography, through democratic processes.

Although they value personal freedom, they seek to ensure, in Locke’s terms, that liberty is not replaced with a license to engage in immoral behavior.

• Originalism serves as a primary judicial philosophy for interpreting the Constitution based on its historical meaning.
• The center-right ideology is defined by a fusion of moderate economic libertarianism and moderate social conservatism.
• This ideological blend became the dominant force within the Republican Party following World War II.
• The established center-right consensus remained largely unchallenged until the political emergence of Donald Trump.
• The rise of the New Right represents a significant shift away from traditional post-war Republican norms.

The center right’s fusion of moderate economic libertarianism and moderate social conservatism emerged as the dominant ideology within the Republican Party in the United States in the decades after World War II.

• Center-left liberalism traces its intellectual lineage to John Locke and Mill's harm principle, seeking to maximize personal liberty while balancing community needs.
• The movement prioritizes LGBTQ+ rights by framing them as compatible with traditional morality, as seen in the legal recognition of same-sex marriage.
• A core tenet is the 'living Constitution' philosophy, which empowers a robust judiciary to reinterpret legal texts to meet contemporary social and equality needs.
• While endorsing private property and capitalism, the center-left views the market through its potential to improve the lives of the least well-off.
• The ideology supports significant government intervention to reduce economic inequality through progressive taxation and funded services like healthcare and education.
• Unlike socialism, the center-left maintains that the government's role in addressing poverty is important but ultimately limited within a capitalist framework.

Supreme Court justice William Brennan (1906–1997) was well known for advocating the view that the Constitution is a 'living' document, which requires judges to interpret the constitutional text in a way that renders it capable of resolving issues in light of contemporary understandings of equality.

• The American center-left has increasingly advocated for majority rule, including the abolition of the Electoral College to ensure the popular vote winner becomes president.
• The New Left emerged in the 1960s as a diverse movement that views center-left liberalism as insufficiently progressive.
• Multiculturalism, a core component of the New Left, posits that world cultures deserve equal respect and provide essential identity to individuals.
• Multiculturalists argue that societies do not require a common underlying culture to function and are instead enriched by cultural diversity.
• Critics like John Rawls suggest that intense multiculturalism might conflict with center-left requirements for shared liberal democratic values.
• Some radical multiculturalists believe groups should retain their identity even if their cultural practices reject prevalent Western norms.

Still, some multiculturalists believe so strongly in the benefit of allowing groups to retain their cultural identity that they contend that even cultures that may reject prevalent Western norms—for example, allowing women to work—should not be.

• Environmentalism emerged as a prominent movement in the 1970s, initially focusing on overpopulation and food supply concerns.
• The movement shifted its primary focus toward global warming following the agricultural advancements of the Green Revolution.
• Environmentalists argue that the world's climate is in a crisis state that threatens both biodiversity and human populations.
• Critics within the movement claim that center-left ideologies fail to address the climate crisis due to their focus on private property and limited government.
• The concept of animal rights, pioneered by Peter Singer, challenges the 'speciesist' nature of traditional liberal politics.

Animal rights activists see the center left, by contrast, as narrowly speciesist, or unjustly concerned primarily with human well-being.

• The New Left's commitment to feminism blurs traditional political boundaries between the center-left, center-right, and classical liberalism.
• First-wave feminism focused on legal and democratic rights, such as suffrage and the right to enter contracts, which align with classical liberal values.
• Second-wave feminism, sparked by Betty Friedan, addressed systemic sexism and personal freedoms including abortion, no-fault divorce, and domestic safety.
• Third-wave feminism emerged in the 1990s to challenge embedded cultural patriarchy and upend traditional societal norms.
• Modern feminist movements advocate for a fluid conception of gender, sex positivity, and the elimination of gender differences in all areas of public life.
• The political classification of feminism is shifting, with second-wave ideals now firmly rooted in the center-left while third-wave goals remain a subject of debate.

The publication of Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique in 1963 marked the popular emergence of second-wave feminism.

• Proponents of critical race and gender theory advocate for equity through policies that compensate for past injustices, such as targeted federal grants.
• The theory incorporates a unique epistemology suggesting that oppressed groups possess a more comprehensive understanding of the world than their oppressors.
• Oppressed individuals must understand both their own condition and the perspective of the dominant group to survive, resulting in an 'epistemologically richer' viewpoint.
• Intersectionality posits that overlapping identities, such as race and gender, exacerbate the degree of oppression an individual experiences.
• Some theorists argue that the insights of those at the intersection of multiple marginalized identities are the most socially and politically insightful.
• Equity-based solutions may include specialized programs restricted to specific demographic intersections, such as Black or Hispanic women.

The oppressed, on the other hand, have to cultivate both an understanding of their own condition and an understanding of their oppressors’ perspective in order to develop strategies of resistance.

• Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw introduced the concept of intersectionality to describe overlapping systems of oppression.
• Critical race theorists argue that racism is structural and can exist independently of individual intent.
• Past racist decisions are embedded in the legal, political, and cultural fabric of modern society.
• Systems like merit-based college admissions are viewed as complicit in racism due to historical inequities in schooling and housing.
• Standardized testing is seen as a tool that perpetuates systemic racism by ignoring the legacy of past discriminatory practices.
• Individuals must consciously subvert accepted norms to avoid participating in these inherited racist systems.

These past racist actions, critical race theorists maintain, have become a part of the fabric of the environment that shapes how people act.

• Socialists advocate for a transition away from capitalism, arguing that center-left reforms are insufficient to achieve true material equality.
• The ideology is built on the premise that individual success is a product of societal support, justifying high taxation and wealth redistribution.
• Contemporary democratic socialism integrates New Left priorities like environmentalism and critical race theory with traditional socialist economic goals.
• A core tenet is the rejection of market-based solutions for essential services, such as healthcare, in favor of government-administered systems.
• Democratic socialists assert the state's right to take ownership of private companies in critical sectors like energy or housing if they fail to meet public needs.

Socialists argue that “no man is an island” and, therefore, that the material success of any individual or group is the result of innumerable societal supports.

• Democratic socialists advocate for government intervention in private industry to ensure specific societal outputs.
• The ideology supports the temporary or permanent nationalization of private companies when necessary for the public good.
• Critics of the current U.S. federal minimum wage argue it is insufficient to keep a family above the poverty line.
• Advocates propose a 'living wage' mandate that requires private employers to pay higher rates than standard minimums.
• Global economic data shows significant variation in minimum wage standards, with some nations lacking a legal minimum entirely.

Democratic socialists are willing to require companies to offer not merely a minimum wage but what advocates call a “living wage,” guaranteeing to each employee a higher pay rate by imposing broad mandates on private employers.

• Democratic socialism prioritizes human rights over national borders, advocating for easier entry for immigrants in need.
• Unlike Marxist or Maoist ideologies, democratic socialists reject violent revolution and one-party rule in favor of the democratic political process.
• The movement emphasizes community organizing and political mobilization to empower marginalized individuals to demand systemic change.
• Bolivarian socialism, or Chavismo, defines itself through opposition to neoliberalism and the perceived foreign influence of international financial institutions.
• The Venezuelan model utilizes state ownership of natural resources, like petroleum, to fund income redistribution and social safety nets.
• To maintain their model, Bolivarian leaders often seek control over the media and judiciary, which can lead to the violation of human rights.

Chávez and Maduro see neoliberalism as outside pressures that amount to foreign rule.

• Globalism advocates for the empowerment of international institutions like the United Nations to address worldwide issues such as climate change and economic inequality.
• The ideology of cosmopolitanism encourages individuals to identify primarily as citizens of the world rather than as members of a specific nation.
• United Nations ideology seeks to bypass national or regional biases, aiming to eliminate colonial tropes like the 'White savior' in international development.
• Indigenism emphasizes the preservation of tribal communities, arguing that they foster higher levels of trust, reciprocity, and ecological sustainability than modern states.
• Indigenists often propose a federalist model where a central state provides modern resources and security while allowing tribes to maintain self-governance.
• A central tension in Indigenist thought is the extent to which a central government should intervene in tribal areas to protect what it defines as basic rights.

The United Nations ideology liberates its supporters from any narrow viewpoint tied to a particular country, region, or religious belief.

• The New Right represents a significant ideological shift away from center-right democratic liberalism.
• This movement has achieved global political success in countries including the United States, Brazil, and Hungary.
• Unlike the Old Right, the New Right does not advocate for monarchical authoritarianism or inherited aristocracy.
• The movement appeals to those who feel their traditional religious or classical liberal values are under siege.
• Adherents argue that the center-right is insufficiently protective against perceived cultural and political threats.

The New Right has enjoyed political success not only in the United States but also in Brazil and Hungary.

• The New Right identifies 'cultural Marxism' as a primary threat, viewing it as the weaponization of culture against traditional values.
• Herbert Marcuse's 'One-Dimensional Man' is cited as a foundational text for the counterculture, arguing that consumerism pacified the working class.
• Marcuse advocated for minorities, outsiders, and the radical intelligentsia to lead a revolutionary overthrow of capitalism in place of the proletariat.
• Critics like Os Guinness argue that this counterculture has become the dominant ethos in Hollywood and social media, leading to moral decline.
• Figures like William Barr use the term metaphorically to link critical race and gender theories to Marxist 'us versus them' revolutionary tactics.

Marcuse argued that the working classes have become immersed in consumerist culture and, needing jobs to fulfill their consumerist appetites, have lost their ability to think in a revolutionary way about their oppression.

• Political ideologies serve as frameworks for making sense of the world and evaluating various government policy options.
• The study of diverse political perspectives is a tool for sharpening critical-thinking skills and problem-solving abilities.
• Modern conservatives increasingly view equity-based policies as a direct challenge to the principle of equal treatment under the law.
• The New Right perceives the emphasis on marginalized groups as an assault on the social and demographic influence of Christianity.
• Critics argue that Judeo-Christian values are the foundational support for individual rights, democracy, and the rule of law.
• The adoption of diversity and inclusion agendas by large corporations has intensified the conservative sense of being under cultural attack.

Many among the New Right see calls for equity, understood as calls to extend greater legal and political emphasis to historically marginalized groups, as an attack directed primarily against the social influence of Christianity.

• The traditional alliance between big business and conservative politics is fracturing as the New Right accuses major corporations of becoming 'woke capitalists.'
• New Right thinkers argue that large firms prioritize global profits and New Left social values over the traditional center-right coalition's principles.
• Critics like J.D. Vance contend that corporate investments in China betray Western values and create a dependency that prevents firms from challenging the Chinese Communist Party.
• Conservative advocacy groups have launched targeted media campaigns to pressure CEOs into abandoning progressive political stances.
• The New Right has embraced conservative populism, a movement seeking to reclaim government power for 'ordinary people' against perceived elite overreach.
• While American populism was historically a left-wing force focused on economic fairness for farmers, it has evolved into a powerful right-wing ideology.

Those on the New Right see these “woke capitalists” as violating the close connection between economic freedom, free markets, social conservatism that defined the center-right coalition for decades.

• Conservative populism advocates for using government power to regulate media and corporate elites to protect traditional Western culture.
• The movement marks a shift from traditional center-right libertarianism toward an expansive role for government in the economy and social regulation.
• Key policy pillars include tighter immigration enforcement to protect domestic wages and a non-interventionist foreign policy that prioritizes national resources.
• While sharing a distrust of social media giants with the left, conservative populists specifically seek to reduce content restrictions they view as biased.
• Global leaders like Viktor Orbán and Jair Bolsonaro exemplify the movement's focus on national heritage and the integration of religious values into public law.

Nevertheless, while the center right has historically sought to minimize government regulations, the New Right sees an expansive role for government.

• Certain political movements paradoxically repudiate the concept of ideology while simultaneously expressing their own clusters of ideas about how politics should function.
• Marxists promote 'scientific socialism,' arguing that traditional ideologies are merely tools used by the ruling class to perpetuate their power through distorted reasoning.
• Followers of Edmund Burke and Michael Oakeshott reject rationalist ideologies, believing they overestimate human reason and dangerously ignore time-tested traditions.
• Burkeanism advocates for prudence and cautious innovation, prioritizing the complexity of political life over abstract ideological blueprints.
• Religious extremism represents a third category that rejects secular ideology, instead prioritizing divine revelation as the ultimate guide for political action.

Marx held that the ruling class would concoct views about the world to perpetuate their rule.

• Religious extremism emerges as a response to the perceived failure of reason, science, and history to provide unambiguous political guidance.
• Proponents of this view reject secularism, believing that divine revelation is the only singular and clear guide for governing human life.
• Extremists often categorize all political thought outside of their specific revelation as empty human 'ideology.'
• This phenomenon is global and cross-denominational, manifesting in Buddhist, Jewish, Christian, and Muslim contexts.
• Religious extremism frequently leads to the exclusion or forced removal of those deemed 'false believers' or 'foreigners' from the political community.

For religious extremists, everything outside of revelation is empty human “ideology.”

• Classical liberalism emphasizes individual rights, limited government, and capitalist economic freedom as defined by thinkers like John Stuart Mill.
• Nationalism emerged in the 19th century as an identity-based ideology, often conflicting with the internationalist goals of Marxist communism.
• Fascism and Nazism developed as extreme nationalist responses to communism, characterized by racial exclusivism and totalitarian control.
• Democratic liberalism remains the dominant ideology in industrialized nations, balancing accountable government with capitalist protections.
• The New Left encompasses diverse movements like environmentalism and critical race theory, aiming to push society toward more progressive goals.
• Authoritarianism persists in various forms, from strict communist control in China to moderate regimes that consolidate power without democratic accountability.

Marx and Engels argued that nationalism divided workers who should cooperate across national boundaries to respond to and eventually overthrow capitalism.

• The New Right and conservative populism have emerged to challenge the center-right for failing to sufficiently protect traditional cultural norms.
• Movements associated with conservative populism have achieved significant electoral success in nations like the United States, Hungary, and Brazil.
• Certain political frameworks, such as Marxism and Burkeanism, reject the label of 'ideology' in favor of hard social science or historical tradition.
• Religious extremists dismiss human political reasoning entirely, favoring literal and inflexible interpretations of divine revelation as a societal blueprint.
• The text defines key ideological terms including authoritarianism, classical liberalism, and the 'dictatorship of the proletariat' to distinguish various political structures.

Religious extremists reject the idea that humans can reason to the best form of political regime, asserting that a blueprint for society is readily at hand in the form of literal and inflexible readings of divine revelation.

• First-wave feminism focused on legal and professional equality, including voting rights and the ability to enter contracts.
• The harm principle suggests that the state should only restrict individual freedom when an action causes harm to others.
• Intersectionality examines how overlapping identities can exacerbate the experience of oppression for certain individuals.
• Multiculturalism advocates for the state to affirm and respect diverse cultural identities as a source of individual self-worth.
• Nationalism emphasizes a shared identity based on blood, history, and soil, often excluding other identities.
• Maoism identifies the peasantry rather than industrial workers as the primary agents for communist revolution.

nationalism pride in and c elebra tion o f a national identity based on share d blood, his tory, and soil , usually to the exclusion or detriment o f other identities

• The text defines various political frameworks, including political secularism, which advocates for the separation of religious principles from government administration.
• Feminism is categorized into waves, with the second wave focusing on bodily autonomy and the third wave targeting embedded cultural patriarchal norms.
• Social contract theory and the 'state of nature' are explored as foundational concepts used by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau to explain the origins of government.
• Structural racism is defined as a systemic phenomenon where legal and cultural contexts are shaped by past racist decisions, independent of individual intent.
• Totalitarianism is described as a system where the state seeks total control over citizens' lives to achieve specific state objectives.
• The review questions highlight classical political philosophy, including Plato's rule by philosophers and Aristotle's critique of democracy.

structural racism a form o f racism thought to b e manifest when actions are taken within a leg al, politic al, and cultural c onte xt that has been shaped by the past racist decisions o f others , reg ardles s of the individual actors’ p endorsement beliefs or intent

• The text covers foundational political concepts including the harm principle and Marxist views on the working class as a revolutionary force.
• It explores variations of Marxism, such as Gramsci's focus on cultural control and Maoism's specific perspective on the peasantry.
• Modern political alignments are examined, including the composition of political fusionism and the rise of the New Left and Critical Race Theory.
• Conservative populism is characterized as a movement that views both the New Left and the traditional center-right as threats or inadequate.
• The 'New Right' critique of 'woke capitalism' highlights a perceived betrayal of traditional social values and the breakdown of the center-right coalition.
• Alternatives to formal ideology are presented, such as the Burkean emphasis on history and tradition over abstract human reason.

Those on the New Right see “woke capitalists” as betraying the long-standing social values of their countries of origin.

• The chapter explores the tension between individual freedom and government authority, using COVID-19 mask mandates as a primary example of this conflict.
• Individual liberty and democracy have faced a global decline for fifteen consecutive years according to data from Freedom House.
• Political systems vary wildly in their treatment of dissent, ranging from protected protest in the United States to violent suppression in Myanmar.
• The text distinguishes between the responsibilities an individual owes to their community and the inherent rights they possess against government interference.
• Key areas of civil liberties to be examined include privacy, freedom of movement, the rights of the accused, and the right to a healthy environment.

In Myanmar, a military dictatorship, the government violently shuts down anti-government protests.

• Communities are defined as groups with shared interests and values where individual actions inevitably affect others.
• Membership in a community requires fulfilling responsibilities such as cooperation, respect, and civic engagement.
• Civil liberties are distinct from civil rights, serving as specific guarantees of freedom from government interference.
• The legitimacy of government restriction depends on whether an action is a fundamental liberty and if the limit serves the common good.
• Fundamental rights, like the right to vote in the US, can be implied by democratic identity even if not explicitly stated in a constitution.

The Constitution does prohibit denial of the right to vote on the basis of race or sex, and it states that certain people are elected to office, but nowhere does it guarantee a right to vote or say who gets to do the voting.

• The U.S. Constitution intentionally avoids listing every civil liberty to prevent the misconception that rights are gifts from the government.
• Founders believed in natural rights derived from 'nature and nature's God' that exist independently of constitutional text.
• Civil liberties represent the freedom of individuals to act or speak without government interference, though they require government enforcement.
• Civil rights are government guarantees of equal treatment designed to prevent discrimination based on shared characteristics like race or gender.
• Human rights are considered inalienable endowments that serve as the foundation for freedom and encompass both civil liberties and civil rights.
• While human rights do not emanate from the state, they require government action to be formally recognized and protected.

Most of the founders, on the contrary, held that individuals have natural rights that entail civil liberties, which the government must not imperil.

• Civil liberties and civil rights are categorized as subsets of universal human rights, which are theoretically inalienable and inherent to all people.
• Philosophical foundations for these rights differ, with Locke viewing them as objective moral truths and Hobbes seeing them as necessary restraints on selfish human nature.
• Global implementation is hindered by conflicting political and legal philosophies, such as the tension between the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam.
• Human rights declarations are generally nonbinding, meaning sovereign governments can choose to ignore them without direct legal consequence.
• The case of South African apartheid illustrates that significant human rights progress often requires internal governmental change rather than just international pressure.
• The primary enforcement mechanism for international human rights is social and economic pressure rather than mandatory legal force.

As part of their sovereignty, governments are free to ignore or follow human rights declarations at will.

• Human rights declarations like the UDHR serve as idealistic frameworks that can exert economic and social pressure on non-compliant governments.
• The case of South African apartheid demonstrates that international sanctions can influence a nation to eventually adopt global human rights standards.
• Civil liberties and civil rights define the regulatory relationship between the individual and the community, balancing personal freedom with communal good.
• The United States Bill of Rights extends its protections to all persons within its jurisdiction, not just to citizens.
• While the US Constitution is a primary example of civil liberty guarantees, many other countries protect rights that are not explicitly mentioned in the US document.
• The first ten amendments establish specific protections ranging from freedom of expression to procedural guarantees for the accused.

As this example illustrates, human rights declarations are primarily idealistic, but they can be used to put economic or social pressure on governments to urge them to change policies.

• A constitution serves as a foundational framework or blueprint for a government's operation and structure.
• Constitutions do not necessarily have to be written in a single document, as seen in the systems of Britain, New Zealand, and Israel.
• Key functions of a constitution include defining government branches, outlining duties, and establishing principles of liberty.
• A defining characteristic of a constitution is that it must be more difficult to amend or change than ordinary laws.
• Constitutionalism involves the limitation of government power and the reservation of specific freedoms for the people.

The constitution need not be in writing, in one document, or even labeled a constitution.

• Constitutions are categorized by whether they frame civil liberties as negative or positive rights.
• Negative rights constitutions, like the US Constitution, focus on placing specific limitations on government power.
• Positive rights constitutions emphasize the government's active obligation to guarantee and protect the rights of its citizens.
• The German Basic Law serves as a primary example of a positive rights framework, explicitly stating that freedoms 'shall be guaranteed.'
• Most democratic constitutions drafted after World War II shifted toward positive rights to prevent the recurrence of state-sponsored atrocities.
• While the US Constitution is primarily negative, many modern documents view the government as a protector against all infringements rather than just a restricted entity.

After the Nazis used the existing German constitution to restrict people’s freedoms in Germany and in the countries they conquered, people in the affected countries wanted assurances that the government recognized its obligation to the people and not just the people’s obligation to the government.

• Constitutions define the scope of individual freedom by balancing government authority against personal action.
• Individualist systems prioritize the person over the community, asserting that rights are inherent and must be preserved by the state.
• Libertarianism, or classical liberalism, focuses on negative rights by placing strict restraints on government intervention.
• Modern liberalism emphasizes the government's active obligation to enforce laws that protect personal autonomy.
• Communitarian systems seek a balance that emphasizes social cohesiveness while still recognizing individual freedoms.
• The philosopher John Stuart Mill argued that power should only be exercised over an individual to prevent harm to others.

The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.

• Libertarian-style constitutions like that of the US prioritize individual freedom, requiring clear proof of harm before the government can restrict speech or action.
• Even in negative-rights systems, the government intervenes in cases of direct threats to safety or defamation of private individuals.
• Liberal societies, such as Germany, take a more proactive approach by protecting personal honor and young people, placing more restrictions on speech to benefit the collective.
• Communitarian systems view individuals as inseparable from society, emphasizing government's role in solving public problems and protecting the common good.
• Authoritarian communitarianism, seen in countries like China and Singapore, enforces social cohesion by strictly limiting personal freedoms and prohibiting disruption of the state system.

For example, a person in the United States can say anything against any political candidate; they can even lie about the candidate.

• The Constitution of the People's Republic of China explicitly grants citizens freedoms of speech, press, assembly, and association.
• There is a significant discrepancy between the written constitutional clauses and the actual practices of the Chinese government.
• The state prioritizes the maintenance of a cohesive society over the protection of individual autonomy.
• Governmental actions focus on safeguarding the regime's vision of social order rather than personal liberties.
• Visual symbols of military power, such as those in Russia, serve as historical reminders of authoritarian governance styles.

However, comparing these two clauses with actual practices in the People's Republic of China shows that the government’s emphasis is not on protecting individual freedom and autonomy but on protecting the government’s view of a cohesive society.

• Responsive communitarianism attempts to balance individual autonomy with the common good, rejecting both authoritarianism and absolute libertarianism.
• The philosophy posits that individual identity is partially constructed by the community, justifying societal restraints when individual actions challenge accepted norms.
• The COVID-19 pandemic serves as a primary case study for the tension between personal civil liberties and government mandates for public health.
• Opposition to pandemic restrictions often stemmed from a prioritization of personal risk-assessment over the collective safety of others.
• A government is only truly constitutional if it practices constitutionalism, which requires the rule of law, limited government, and guaranteed rights.
• The rule of law is defined by four key principles: accountability for all actors, just laws, clear publicity, and even application.

The individual is within society, the community, so the community constructs part of the individual identity.

• Open government requires that the enactment and enforcement of laws remain accessible, fair, and efficient for all.
• Impartial dispute resolution depends on ethical, independent representatives who reflect the communities they serve.
• Constitutionalism functions by balancing limited government authority with the fundamental worth and self-determination of the individual.
• Due process serves as a legal requirement that the government respect individual rights, ensuring no person is deprived of life, liberty, or property without legal fairness.
• The concept of due process is divided into procedural guidelines for government interaction and substantive rights to fair treatment.
• Violations of due process undermine the rule of law by creating inequality or placing specific groups above the law.

Maintaining a balance between government authority and individual freedom is a challenge.

• The court established the right to choose a marriage partner as a fundamental liberty protected from government interference.
• Denying same-sex marriage violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment by creating unequal treatment between couples.
• Same-sex marriage serves as a dual legal issue, representing both a civil liberty and a civil rights concern.
• Liberty is defined as more than freedom from incarceration; it encompasses personal autonomy and the right to make personal decisions.
• Privacy is identified as the most fundamental aspect of civil liberty and is often implicitly or explicitly included in constitutional protections.
• Global interpretations of due process vary significantly, despite common constitutional language regarding life, liberty, and property.

To have liberty is to have personal autonomy, and to have personal autonomy, one must have the right to make personal decisions.

• Privacy is defined as the right to be free from intrusion into personal matters and the fundamental right to be left alone.
• In liberal democracies, privacy provides a space for personal autonomy, allowing individuals to think and act without government surveillance.
• The U.S. Supreme Court has used the right to privacy to protect personal decisions regarding education, reproduction, and sexual conduct.
• Key legal precedents like Griswold v. Connecticut established privacy as an implied liberty within the U.S. Constitution.
• International legal frameworks, such as the UK Human Rights Act of 1998, explicitly recognize the right to respect for private and family life.

The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime.

• International standards permit privacy limitations only when necessary for national security, public safety, or protecting the rights of others.
• While the US Constitution lacks an explicit mention of privacy, the Supreme Court recognizes it as a fundamental right derived from multiple amendments.
• Justice Brandeis famously defined privacy as 'the right to be let alone,' calling it the most comprehensive and valued right of civilized people.
• Specific constitutional protections against quartering soldiers, unreasonable searches, and self-incrimination form the legal basis for American privacy.
• The Ninth Amendment serves as a critical catch-all, suggesting that rights not explicitly listed in the Constitution still belong to the people.
• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights explicitly protects individuals from arbitrary interference with their family, home, and correspondence.

the right to be let alone [is] the most comprehensive of rights, and the right most valued by civilized men.

• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights includes a right to privacy, but enforcement varies significantly across member nations.
• The United Nations utilizes a special rapporteur to monitor digital surveillance and global compliance with privacy standards.
• Privacy acts as a barrier against government intrusion, yet the threshold for permissible state interference is culturally and legally subjective.
• Societal views on personal autonomy, such as LGBTQ+ rights and interracial marriage, dictate how privacy laws evolve over time.
• Democratic systems allow societal shifts to redefine privacy boundaries, whereas authoritarian regimes impose strict interpretations of private conduct.

As society’s interpretation of what is personal and individual and what is necessary for the good of the community changes, the interpretation of the right to privacy changes.

• International organizations provide various tools and indices to track trends in human rights, freedom, and the rule of law across different nations.
• The recognition of personal autonomy varies significantly by country, with some governments restricting reproductive choices, education for girls, or clothing options.
• Societal interpretations of the 'common good' often lead to state-imposed restrictions on privacy and individualism, even in countries that claim to protect these rights.
• The rise of sophisticated cyber technologies has created new tensions between the right to privacy and the necessity of state surveillance.
• In the United States, laws like COPPA attempt to regulate how private businesses and social media platforms store and collect personal data, particularly regarding children.
• European nations generally maintain more robust and stringent data privacy laws compared to the regulatory framework found in the United States.

Thus, even in countries that declare that they will protect privacy and individualism, society’s interpretation of what is necessary to create a community can lead to restrictions intended to contribute to the common good.

• The US government justifies digital surveillance by citing national security needs, while citizens argue for Fourth Amendment protections against warrantless searches.
• The European Union's GDPR provides some of the world's strictest data protections, applying to both private businesses and government agencies.
• UNCTAD reports that 137 out of 194 countries have enacted legislation to secure data protection, reflecting a growing global concern over unauthorized data sharing.
• While the Chinese constitution technically protects privacy, broad exceptions for state security allow for near-total surveillance of public and digital spaces.
• China utilizes mass surveillance as a tool to target specific ethnic groups and eliminate what the state defines as ideological viruses.
• The conflict between individual privacy rights and collective security remains an ongoing and unresolved global debate.

China uses mass surveillance to “ eradicate ideological viruses ,” which the y identify as the religious and cultural beliefs o f certain ethnic groups .

• The rise of digital data storage has increased threats to privacy from both corporate data mining and government surveillance networks.
• China's massive surveillance system exemplifies the tension between individual privacy and state regulation through facial recognition technology.
• The International Bill of Human Rights, comprising the UDHR, ICCPR, and ICESCR, establishes global standards for freedom of expression and religion.
• Freedom of expression is not absolute; it is legally restricted in cases of libel, slander, obscenity, and threats to national security.
• The 'paradox of tolerance' arises when liberal democracies must decide whether to tolerate ideas that are themselves intolerant of personal liberty.

This is a developing area of tension between individual privacy and government protection or regulation of the community.

• Civil liberties are often viewed as limits on government interference, but they must be balanced against the needs of a diverse community.
• Social responsibility involves recognizing that individual actions have the potential to affect the community as a whole.
• Intercultural competence is a key component of social responsibility, requiring an understanding of different perspectives and traditions.
• Different nations employ varying strategies to balance individual rights with community safety, such as Germany's strict laws against Holocaust denial.
• While the United States provides broad protections for speech, it limits hate speech in cases involving direct threats or violence.
• The 'paradox of tolerance' arises when a society must decide whether to restrict certain viewpoints to protect the dignity of its members.

Linking the ideas of civil liberties with the larger concept of social responsibility allows one to appreciate how the rights of individuals and the larger community are intertwined.

• Germany's Network Enforcement Act tests the boundary between regulating criminal hate speech and protecting constitutional free speech rights.
• Global approaches to political expression vary wildly, ranging from total suppression in Belarus to surprising new philosophical openness in Saudi Arabia.
• The 'paradox of tolerance' often centers on religious expression, which involves the dual issues of free exercise and government establishment.
• The US Constitution's establishment clause and free exercise clause create a complex legal framework requiring government neutrality toward religion.
• The landmark Everson v. Board of Education case established that public benefits like busing must be applied neutrally to avoid favoring or hindering religious groups.

The paradox of tolerance is a frequent issue when it comes to religious expression.

• The legal system must distinguish between neutral, general government actions and those that explicitly target or benefit specific religions.
• Individualist governments place limits on religious practices that are deemed harmful, such as child abuse or violent expressions of extremist views.
• A major constitutional tension exists between the right to free exercise of religion and the legal requirement for equal treatment of all persons.
• Historical and modern legal battles involve businesses attempting to use religious beliefs to justify discrimination against protected groups.
• While Western European nations have moved toward religious pluralism, global trends show a 20% increase in government restrictions and favoritism since 2007.
• The conflict between religious freedom and civil rights remains an ongoing global controversy, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ rights and state-mandated religious adherence.

This controversy is ongoing in the United States and around the world.

• Governments often impose dress codes based on religious or secular ideologies, ranging from Iran's mandatory hijab to France's bans on religious attire.
• State-sponsored religion in countries like Qatar can lead to the restriction of non-Islamic worship and the prohibition of minority religious symbols.
• In China, religious practices are sometimes viewed as threats to communist goals, resulting in severe restrictions and internment in reeducation camps.
• Many nations prioritize localized interpretations of civil liberties over the international norms established by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
• Freedom of movement is a recognized human right consisting of the ability to travel within one's own country and the right to leave or return to it.
• The United States treats the right to travel as an unenumerated fundamental right, ensuring equal treatment for citizens regardless of which state they visit.

Women in Iran who appear in public without wearing an Islamic hijab can be imprisoned or fined.

• The Fourteenth Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause protects the fundamental right to interstate travel within the United States.
• Federal statutes like the Mann Act demonstrate that the U.S. government can still restrict travel associated with illegal activities.
• Sweden's constitution provides a unique 'right of public access' to nature, allowing citizens to traverse private property to experience the environment.
• China's 'hukou' system and police checkpoints create significant legal and physical barriers to internal movement for its citizens.
• The implementation of a social credit system in China further restricts travel based on an individual's government-assigned score.

This right allows travel inside the country and access to private property to experience nature as long as an individual does not cause damage to the property.

• International travel is more strictly regulated than domestic movement, with passports serving as the primary global control mechanism for exit and reentry.
• The 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act formalized the requirement for US citizens to possess a government-issued passport for international transit.
• The US Supreme Court has recognized the right to travel as a fundamental liberty protected by the Fifth Amendment's due process clause.
• Global restrictions on movement vary significantly, ranging from standard criminal investigations to the systemic targeting of ethnic groups like the Uyghurs in China.
• Migration is legally distinct from travel due to the intent of permanent relocation, involving complex frameworks for refugee status and asylum.
• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that individuals have the right to seek asylum from persecution and the right to a nationality.

Travel abroad, like travel within the country, may be . . . as close to the heart of the individual as the choice of what he eats, or wears, or reads.

• National immigration laws often conflict with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' affirmation of migration rights.
• Refugee crises create significant political and social tension regarding asylum capacity and national security concerns.
• The 'open borders' debate proposes a world where movement is unrestricted except for safety and criminal issues.
• Rule-of-law countries must provide 'rights upon arrest,' including the right to remain silent and access to legal counsel.
• Protections against unreasonable search and seizure are essential human rights norms, though many countries fail to adhere to them.

There is an ongoing debate about changing the world to one of open borders, where people are free to move about the world as they want.

• The U.S. Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio established that illegally obtained evidence cannot be used against a defendant under the Fourth Amendment.
• The writ of habeas corpus serves as a fundamental rule-of-law protection, preventing the government from holding individuals indefinitely without cause.
• Human rights organizations increasingly view climate change and environmental damage as direct violations of the right to lead a safe and healthy life.
• The UN Framework Principles outline how recognizing environmental rights can lead to stronger policies, better enforcement, and reduced social injustices.
• Over 100 nations have constitutionally codified the right to a healthy environment, while the U.S. faces landmark litigation like Juliana v. United States.
• The Juliana v. United States lawsuit, brought by children, seeks to hold the government accountable for failing to address climate change and its impact on future generations.

In countries where this right is not recognized, a person can be held indefinitely incommunicado without any right to seek their freedom or to demand that the government prove the charges against them.

• The Juliana v. United States case highlights the government's long-term knowledge of climate threats and the legal push for environmental accountability.
• Climate change is increasingly framed as a human rights issue, forcing international bodies to address the legal status of displaced populations.
• The UNHCR identifies climate change as a 'threat multiplier' that exacerbates resource scarcity and fuels potential conflicts.
• Extreme weather events and environmental degradation currently displace an average of over 20 million people within their own countries annually.
• International law must evolve to address the protection of people forced across borders by climate-related disasters.
• The tension between individual civil liberties and community responsibilities remains a foundational challenge in modern governance.

In such conditions, climate change can act as a threat multiplier, exacerbating existing tensions and adding to the potential for conflicts.

• Constitutions function as blueprints for government, categorized by their emphasis on negative rights (limiting state power) or positive rights (obligating state action).
• Political systems are defined by the tension between individualist priorities and communitarian cohesiveness, which dictates the scope of personal freedom.
• Constitutionalism relies on the rule of law, requiring that legal processes be clear, stable, and applied evenly to both private and government actors.
• Due process serves as a critical legal safeguard, ensuring the government respects individual rights through both procedural guidelines and substantive fairness.
• The right to privacy and free expression are fundamental but not absolute, often limited by national security, public safety, or the paradox of tolerance.
• Freedom of movement distinguishes between domestic travel and international migration, with the latter subject to intense debate regarding borders and refugee status.

This intolerant stance on views that a government deems intolerant is referred to as the paradox of tolerance.

• Rule-of-law countries must provide specific procedural protections to the accused, including the right to remain silent and the right to legal counsel.
• The right to due process serves as a critical balance between state power and individual freedom by requiring the government to respect legal rights.
• Environmental damage and climate change are increasingly framed as human rights violations because they threaten the ability to live safe and healthy lives.
• Political systems are categorized by their approach to rights, ranging from authoritarian control to individualist and libertarian minimalism.
• The distinction between negative rights (limitations on government) and positive rights (government obligations) defines how different societies structure their legal frameworks.

As climate change becomes an increasingly urgent issue, the implications for human rights will be a growing area of political and legal debate.

• Responsive communitarianism attempts to balance the common good with individual autonomy without allowing one to dominate the other.
• The rule of law serves as a higher authority than majority rule, ensuring all leaders remain accountable to established legal frameworks.
• Civil liberties are defined as freedoms from government interference, whereas civil rights are government guarantees of equal treatment.
• Individualist systems prioritize the person over the community, while communitarian systems emphasize the collective good as defined by the state.
• Constitutionalism functions as a balancing act between individual freedom and the limitations of government power under the law.

responsive communitarianism a system that seeks to blend the common good with individual a utonom y while not allowing either to take prec edenc e over the other

• The text explores the definition of due process as a legal requirement for governments to respect individual rights.
• It identifies the right to free exercise of religion as a fundamental civil liberty within the context of political science assessments.
• The material addresses the 'paradox of tolerance' through examples of governments restricting expression deemed harmful to the community.
• It highlights how passport requirements and immigration controls can intersect as both civil liberties and civil rights issues.
• Legal protections for the accused, such as the writ of habeas corpus and the right to counsel, are framed as essential components of a fair legal system.
• The text connects environmental issues to human rights, noting that climate change threatens freedom of movement and contributes to global refugee crises.

A hypothetical government protects the free expression of ideas but restricts the expression of ideas deemed harmful to the community.

• The chapter explores the various ways individuals engage in the political process, ranging from voting to grassroots activism.
• The 2012 shooting of Trayvon Martin and the subsequent acquittal of George Zimmerman serve as a catalyst for modern social movements.
• The Black Lives Matter movement is highlighted as a decentralized political and social network focused on eradicating white supremacy and state violence.
• Public opinion is introduced as a measurable metric that fluctuates over time, as seen in the shifting support levels for social justice movements.
• The text outlines the fundamental relationship between political participation and the concept of self-government in a democracy.
• Comparative analysis is used to examine how United States voting rates and participation methods differ from those in other nations.

The outcry over the trial led to the establishment of the Black Lives Matter movement, a decentralized political and social movement “whose mission is to eradicate white supremacy and build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on Black communities by the state.”

• The film Election serves as a cultural touchstone for the complexities and ethical dilemmas inherent in student politics.
• Academic research indicates that school elections are vital training grounds for future civic engagement and adult citizenship.
• Participating in student government helps young people internalize democratic values and the importance of informed decision-making.
• Political participation is defined as any action that expresses an individual's political will within a society.
• Self-government is the essential prerequisite for political participation, requiring that power be derived from the people rather than a favored class.
• James Madison emphasized that a legitimate government must draw its authority from the great body of society for limited periods.

While student elections may seem relatively trivial, they are an important way for students to learn how to make politically informed decisions, understand democratic values and systems, and feel like worthy participants in the democratic process.

• Alexis de Tocqueville observed that American democracy is unique because the people control the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
• Unlike historical British systems where power was class-based, American political authority is derived from society as a whole.
• The concept of self-government is still evolving globally, with Japan being a relatively young democracy established after World War II.
• In Canada, Indigenous groups like the First Nations, Inuit, and Métis continue to advocate for self-governance as a means of cultural preservation.
• Indigenous claims to autonomy are based on their status as the original governors of the land who never willingly surrendered their rights.
• Full political participation is considered impossible without the achievement of self-government for all nations and peoples.

The American institutions are democratic, not only in their principle but in all their consequences.

• Self-government implies that the people are sovereign and that no power exists above them.
• Voting serves as the primary mechanism for ensuring that government officials represent the will and beliefs of the people.
• The principle of 'one person, one vote' was reinforced by the Supreme Court to ensure equal representation across electoral districts.
• While voting is considered a normative and essential democratic act, voter turnout in the United States is often lower than in other industrialized nations.
• The 2020 U.S. election saw a historic 66 percent turnout, the highest recorded since the 1980s.

In self-governing states, the people elect public officials to government positions so those officials can represent the people’s beliefs and craft policies to express their will.

• U.S. voter turnout has fluctuated significantly over time due to the gradual expansion of suffrage from white landowners to all citizens.
• Major legislative milestones like the 19th Amendment and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were required to dismantle gender and race-based barriers.
• Groups such as Native Americans and Asian Americans faced prolonged disenfranchisement even after gaining theoretical citizenship rights.
• The 26th Amendment lowered the voting age to 18 during the Vietnam War, driven by the logic that those old enough to fight should be old enough to vote.
• External crises, including world wars and the 1918 influenza pandemic, have historically hindered physical access to the ballot box.
• Voter participation remains inconsistent today, often dipping during off-year elections when the presidency is not contested.

The 26th Amendment was introduced to allow US citizens aged 18 and older the right to vote based on the principle that it was grossly unfair for the country to ask men to fight in a war when they could not vote on the representatives who were sending them into battle.

• The United States ranks near the bottom of OECD nations for voter turnout, placing 30th out of 35 countries as of 2016.
• Low political salience, where voters feel their individual actions lack a direct connection to political outcomes, is a primary driver of low participation.
• Institutional factors such as unicameralism, compulsory voting, and proportional representation are linked to higher turnout in other industrial democracies.
• Social capital, defined as the social networks connecting people, has been declining in the U.S. since the 1950s, correlating with lower voter engagement.
• Voters are significantly more likely to participate when they perceive their vote as having power or a better chance of resulting in representation.

In other words, people do not vote if they don’t feel like their vote will have any effect.

• A Knight Foundation study of 12,000 nonvoters revealed that 100 million Americans abstained in 2016, primarily due to candidate dislike and low trust in the system.
• Age is the most consistent individual-level predictor of voting behavior, following a curvilinear pattern where participation peaks in middle age.
• Older voters are more likely to vote because they have established voting as a habit and typically have more time available after retirement.
• Residential stability and higher media consumption among seniors are significant factors that correlate with increased electoral participation.
• Seniors demonstrate a clearer understanding of how government policies, such as Social Security, directly impact their lives, motivating them to influence policymakers.
• Despite persistent age gaps, overall voter turnout across all demographic groups has seen an upward trend in the most recent election cycles.

The older voters are, the more likely they are to show up to the polls.

• Individuals earning below the median income are significantly less likely to vote than those earning above it.
• Rising income inequality further decreases the likelihood of lower-income individuals participating in elections.
• Wealthier citizens are more likely to believe their vote influences political outcomes, whereas lower-income citizens often feel their vote lacks impact.
• Lower-income voters face structural barriers such as lack of transportation, difficulty registering, and inability to take time off work.
• Economic hardship can lead to voter apathy as individuals prioritize meeting basic survival needs over political engagement.
• Higher levels of economic development correlate with increased education, which serves as a primary driver for voter turnout.

Economic hardship can result in voter apathy and lead people to withdraw from politics and focus on meeting their basic needs.

• Race remains a significant factor in US voter turnout, with White voters historically participating at higher rates than Asian or Latino voters.
• Black voter turnout has remained steady since the 1965 Voting Rights Act and reached a historic peak in 2012, surpassing White turnout.
• The 2020 election marked a 'seismic shift' in Asian American participation, particularly in Georgia where turnout increased by 63 percent.
• Since 1980, women in the US have consistently voted at higher rates than men, a trend potentially driven by feminist movements and policy mobilization.
• A 'gender canyon' exists in voting preferences, with women generally favoring Democratic candidates while men lean Republican.
• Global gender turnout varies significantly, with the lowest female participation in parts of the Middle East and North Africa, while women lead in 21 of 58 studied countries.

The polls leading up to the 2020 US election illustrated a “gender canyon,” with a projected 15 percent gender gap between men, the majority of whom supported the Republican candidate, and women, who supported the Democratic candidate.

• Individual attitudes such as local interest and a sense of civic duty are primary drivers of political engagement.
• Feelings of guilt associated with not voting correlate strongly with higher registration and turnout rates.
• Political efficacy, or the belief that one's vote matters, significantly impacts the likelihood of participation.
• Historical declines in institutional trust and interest have led to lower overall voter turnout.
• The theory of 'voter fatigue' suggests that the high frequency of elections and decisions discourages citizens from participating.
• Scholars like Arend Lijphart propose that reducing the frequency of elections could actually boost participation rates.

Multiple scholars also support the theory that voter fatigue—the idea that voters face too many elections and too many electoral decisions—depresses participation.

• Voter registration requirements represent one of the most significant institutional limits on political participation in the United States.
• Unlike many other democracies that use automatic registration, the U.S. system places the burden of registration on individuals and states.
• Institutional barriers such as voter ID laws and reduced access to polling places disproportionately affect minority, poor, and younger voters.
• Modern voter suppression tactics include voter roll purges, the elimination of same-day registration, and unchecked gerrymandering.
• Historical disenfranchisement methods like Jim Crow laws used literacy tests and physical violence to systematically exclude Black voters.

Of the 80 million Americans who did not vote in the 2020 election, almost 30 percent cited being unregistered as the top reason they did not go to the polls.

• The Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the 24th Amendment dismantled Jim Crow barriers like poll taxes to protect minority voting rights.
• Political institutions act as counteragents to racism by expanding accessibility for marginalized groups and people with disabilities.
• Global trends show a move toward greater inclusion, with several European nations lowering the legal voting age to 16.
• Religious organizations play a significant role in mobilization by recruiting members and framing civic involvement as having moral consequences.
• Beyond the ballot box, direct communication with elected officials is a fundamental form of participation rooted in colonial-era traditions.
• The First Amendment protects the right to criticize the government, ensuring a 'marketplace of ideas' essential for self-governance.

The presumed right of the people to instruct their elected representatives extends back to colonial times.

• Contacting elected officials is a fundamental way for Americans to express concerns ranging from local ordinances to national executive orders.
• Volunteering serves as a critical entry point for young Americans, who engage in community service at rates nearly equal to Baby Boomers despite lower voter turnout.
• Political campaign volunteers perform essential labor such as door-to-door canvassing, phone banking, and voter registration assistance.
• Active participation in voluntary associations teaches citizens the practical skills necessary for democratic life.
• While U.S. voter turnout is lower than in many developed nations, Americans participate in non-voting political activities at significantly higher rates.
• Digital engagement has become the most common way for Americans to interact with politics, surpassing physical volunteering or attending rallies.

Volunteers help candidates and parties by knocking on voters’ doors and explaining policies one-on-one, phone banking, stuffing envelopes with campaign literature, and sometimes even transporting voters to the polls.

• The Supreme Court protects political donations as a form of free speech, allowing citizens to participate in the democratic process from home.
• While individual donation caps exist, contributors can also give larger sums to PACs and national committees.
• Small-dollar donations are reshaping politics, with nearly 25% of 2020 election funds coming from donors giving less than $200.
• Grassroots fundraising through micro-donations allows non-wealthy individuals to have a collective financial impact on campaigns.
• International laws on campaign finance vary wildly, ranging from strict spending and donation limits in France to no limits at all in Germany.

Political donations, which the Supreme Court has protected as a type of political speech, allow people to feel like they are participating in politics without leaving their homes or picking up a phone.

• Low-energy activities like staying informed and using social media can be as influential as direct political action.
• Discussion serves as a primary vehicle for political learning and helps citizens identify their best interests.
• Self-education is identified as the most critical precursor to deeper levels of civic involvement.
• Effective political discourse requires specific skills such as active listening and finding common ground.
• Organizations like the Common Ground Committee aim to reduce ignorance and fear through structured public forums.

While keeping informed about politics may not seem like political participation the way that voting or volunteering does, educating oneself is perhaps the most important precursor to becoming more fully involved.

• Social media has fundamentally altered how Americans consume news, with nearly half of adults under 30 relying on it as their primary source for political information.
• Digital platforms are positively correlated with increased political agency, information recall, and a greater sense of efficacy among users.
• The ease of digital broadcasting allows anyone to generate news, creating a hazardous environment where falsehoods travel six times faster than the truth.
• Research indicates that falsehoods on social media are 70% more likely to be retweeted and are more effective at changing people's opinions than factual information.
• Potential solutions to misinformation include crowdsourced ratings and encouraging users to actively assess the accuracy of headlines before sharing.
• While social media use and political participation are highly correlated, the relationship is not necessarily causal.

An MIT study found that “falsehoods are 70% more likely to be retweeted on Twitter than the truth, and reach their first 1,500 people six times faster.”

• Political parties like the DNC and RNC offer continuous opportunities for involvement through fundraising, phone-banking, and door-knocking.
• National organizations maintain active operations even between election cycles, constantly seeking volunteers to achieve long-term goals.
• Local and state party organizations often lack the funding of national campaigns, making them heavily dependent on grassroots volunteer labor.
• Active participation in local politics can serve as a career springboard, as demonstrated by figures like Nancy Pelosi.
• Campaign volunteering builds social networks and provides a practical introduction to the inner workings of the political process.

As former House Speaker Tip O’Neill once said, “All politics are local,” and you can volunteer for state and local party organizations, many of which are not as well funded as national campaigns and rely on volunteer help.

• Campaign work is described as a grueling 'slog' involving long hours, constant phone calls, and minimal initial pay.
• Academic study provides policy knowledge, but hands-on extracurricular involvement in campus politics is the primary preparation for campaign operations.
• Most political campaigns are chronically understaffed, creating significant opportunities for rapid upward mobility for dedicated volunteers.
• Success in political staffing often comes from taking on undesirable projects and maintaining consistent follow-through with coordinators.
• Beyond traditional campaigning, social movements and protests serve as powerful catalysts for policy change, as seen in the 2021 surge of Asian American-led activism.

It’s a slog: long nights, early mornings, fast food, and more phone calls than the human ear was built to withstand.

• Collective action through protests serves as a successful method for bringing public attention to specific political causes.
• Protests are a global phenomenon, used in Latin American countries and even authoritarian regimes to express policy demands and demand accountability.
• Political participation through protest transcends demographic divides, involving both rural and urban voters regardless of education levels.
• The digital migration of activism has introduced e-petitioning as a legitimate tool that influences policymakers and presidential responses.
• Protest movements are historically and currently driven by younger generations who utilize digital savvy to mobilize for social change.

Even in authoritarian countries where freedom of expression is not protected, protests function as an important form of political participation.

• Younger generations are shifting away from traditional social ties like family and school toward political identities shaped by self-constructed digital networks.
• The 2019 global protest wave was historically unprecedented, with more protesters active than at any other time in history.
• Digital platforms have enabled students to maintain political momentum and public support for issues like gun control without traditional institutional backing.
• Global protests are increasingly driven by systemic factors including economic stagnation, climate change, and foreign political interference.
• The Hong Kong Umbrella Movement illustrates how physical objects can become powerful political symbols and subsequently be labeled as weapons by the state.
• State responses to modern protests often involve legal crackdowns, such as national security laws and mass arrests, to quell movements for autonomy.

Having become a symbol of the resistance, umbrellas are now considered “weapons” by the Chinese government and are increasingly difficult to purchase online.

• The Hong Kong protest movement adopted the name 'Umbrella Movement' as explained by visual artist Kacey Wong.
• The Arab Spring was ignited by a single act of self-immolation by a Tunisian street vendor protesting authoritarian rule.
• While the Arab Spring led to regime changes in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Yemen, many regions still face ongoing violence and instability.
• Ten years later, Tunisia continues to struggle with civil unrest driven by economic inequality and the failure of successive governments.
• Government crackdowns in both Hong Kong and Tunisia have resulted in the mass arrest and abuse of protesters, including many minors.
• These international movements serve as a reminder that the right to advocate and protest should not be taken for granted.

This single act set off a wave of protests across North Africa and the Middle East, resulting in regime changes and modest political, social, and economic gains in several countries, but also still-ongoing protests and violence.

• Social capital consists of individual connections that benefit personal interests while fostering community norms of reciprocity.
• Robert Putnam defines social capital through diverse networks ranging from family and religious groups to poker clubs and professional contacts.
• Research indicates that increasing social capital directly bolsters political participation across different global cultures.
• In Japan, social networking has been found to fuel political engagement despite historically low participation rates.
• Studies in Latin America show that involvement in non-political activities often serves as a gateway to explicit political activism.
• Fostering interpersonal trust and organizational involvement outside of politics creates a foundation for a more active citizenry.

Social capital is the idea that individuals form connections that benefit their own interests and that these social networks in turn produce communities that create norms of reciprocity.

• Research indicates a positive relationship between Facebook usage and the production of social capital, which facilitates political participation.
• Information seeking on social networks serves as a significant predictor for both online and offline civic engagement.
• The benefits of social media for social capital are not geographically limited, as evidenced by studies of university students in Nigeria.
• Older populations, specifically those over age 65, also experience increased social capital through platforms like Facebook.
• Social capital encourages wider participation in democratic processes, potentially rivaling the impact of voter registration reforms.
• The digital environment allows for community cohesion and constructive political reflection despite the time constraints of modern life.

Social capital produces an important political consequence by encouraging wider participation in democratic processes.

• Political participation is a vital measure of democratic health and serves as a primary source of government legitimacy.
• While voting is a useful proxy for sentiment, it lacks the specific detail necessary for officials to understand complex public desires.
• Public opinion is defined as the aggregation of individual views that ordinary citizens are willing to express openly at a specific point in time.
• Elected officials rely on public opinion data to act as experts and representatives for a citizenry occupied by daily life and work.
• Despite political polarization, significant majority opinions exist on core values like clean water, education, and racial equality.

People have jobs, families, and other pressing concerns, and while it is always important to be involved somehow—whether by voting, writing officials, or reading about politics—we elect public officials to represent our interests and to serve as experts in ways we cannot.

• A majority opinion on a specific issue does not imply that the public holds a consensus across all political topics.
• The theory of issue publics suggests the electorate is composed of small groups focused on specific interests rather than a broad, informed mass.
• Most political information is acquired secondhand rather than through direct experience, making external influences critical in shaping views.
• Demographic factors such as race, age, and gender significantly predict attitudes toward specific events like the January 6th Capitol riots.
• Education levels serve as a primary demographic divide in opinions on immigration and social acceptance, as seen in Brexit polling data.

The theory of issue publics states that the American electorate is made up of multiple small groups that care about single issues, rather than a public that cares equally about all issues.

• Social groups like family, friends, and coworkers significantly shape individual political opinions through a process called socialization.
• The concept of socialization suggests that political alignment is often more about who we stand with than the specific issues themselves.
• Sociology and political science overlap as both disciplines examine how social norms and organizations influence political institutions.
• Political ideology serves as a mental framework or doctrine that guides how individuals believe a government should function.
• Identification as a liberal or conservative often dictates a person's policy preferences before they even evaluate the specific details of a measure.
• Conservatives generally view government intervention as a threat to individual freedoms, while liberals often see it as a tool for social reform.

In other words, and to paraphrase Vincent Price, it is not so much where we stand on the issues but with whom we stand.

• Political ideology acts as a mental picture or cue that dictates how individuals react to complex global ideas like Brexit.
• Opinion leaders are not just elite figures like mayors or bankers but can be 'near-by influencers' within one's own social circle.
• John Stuart Mill observed that the masses often have their thinking done for them by peers who speak in their name on the spur of the moment.
• Social strata generate opinion leaders horizontally, meaning influence often comes from people within the same social or economic class.
• Popular presidents and public figures retain the ability to sway opinions, but their influence is often mediated by local pundits or well-informed neighbors.
• The media exerts a significant short-term influence on opinion, particularly for individuals with lower levels of existing information.

Their thinking is done for them by men much like themselves, addressing or speaking in their name, on the spur of the moment.

• The media exerts significant influence on public opinion, particularly regarding foreign affairs and the framing of political leaders and social issues.
• Historically, constituent letters were the primary method for officials to gauge public sentiment before the development of scientific polling.
• Modern public opinion measurement relies on sampling, where a small group is selected to represent the characteristics of an entire population.
• Probability sampling ensures every individual has an equal chance of selection, allowing researchers to generalize findings to the broader public.
• Traditional methods like random digit dialing are becoming less effective due to the decline of landlines and changing lifestyle patterns.
• Newer techniques, including internet-based surveys and automated interviewing, are emerging as more accurate alternatives for the digital age.

Before w e had a good way to measure public opinion , constituent letters w ere one o f the few ways officials could gauge ho w the public felt.

• The difficulty of reaching survey respondents is a global issue, not limited to the United States.
• Japan has seen significant declines in survey participation, particularly among young urban professionals with long commutes.
• Polling in unstable regions like Ukraine and Venezuela requires dangerous face-to-face interactions rather than phone calls.
• In high-conflict zones, data must often be processed locally due to the inability of pollsters to evacuate safely.
• Quantitative skills are increasingly vital for interpreting complex political data and opinion polls across different nations.

Sampling in countries facing violence or instability can be a serious—and dangerous—problem for pollsters.

• Public opinion data is a fundamental tool used by media, political candidates, and legislators to shape policy and strategy.
• Interpreting numerical data and observable facts is a critical workforce skill applicable to both political science and consumer marketing.
• Nontraditional sampling methods like convenience and cluster sampling offer cost-effective alternatives but lack the scientific reliability of probability samples.
• The accuracy of a poll is heavily dependent on sample size, with larger samples reducing the margin of error to acceptable levels.
• Selection bias and measurement error, often caused by outdated contact methods like landlines or poor question wording, can significantly skew results.

The smaller the sample, the larger the error.

• Subtle linguistic shifts in survey questions, such as using 'global warming' versus 'climate change,' significantly alter respondent data.
• Interviewer bias occurs when the social class, race, or gender of the person conducting the survey influences the participant's answers.
• Response bias arises when individuals provide inaccurate reports of their true opinions to align with perceived social expectations.
• The 'Bradley effect' illustrates how social desirability bias can lead to polling inaccuracies, particularly in races involving minority candidates.
• Voters often provide the answer they believe they 'should' give rather than their genuine feelings to avoid appearing biased.
• These systemic inaccuracies challenge the reliability of polling as a direct reflection of the public's true political will.

The theory behind the Bradley effect is that White voters are unlikely to admit to bias against minority candidates, and as such, polls may overestimate support for a minority candidate.

• Public opinion polls serve as a vital instrument for expressing the 'consent of the governed' as outlined in the Declaration of Independence.
• Academic research consistently demonstrates that government policy tends to respond quickly to shifts in public demand.
• The relationship between the public and officials is reciprocal: voters alert leaders to their preferences, while leaders attempt to sell specific solutions back to the public.
• The act of being polled encourages civic engagement by prompting citizens to become more informed and aware of political alternatives.
• Global public opinion acts as a strategic ally for international cooperation and provides Americans with a necessary external perspective on their own nation's policies.

In a way, we can understand public opinion and its influence on policy as a chicken-and-egg relationship: the public alerts elected officials of their preferences, and these officials then try to sell their solutions to the public as the best course of action.

• Public sentiment is a vital tool for elected officials to maintain credibility and navigate international diplomacy.
• Polling serves as a primary mechanism for legitimizing governments and understanding the collective beliefs of the citizenry.
• Recent presidential elections in 2016 and 2020 exposed significant scientific failures in polling accuracy and predictive modeling.
• Modern challenges such as declining landline use and low public trust have made it increasingly difficult to reach representative samples.
• Despite technical inaccuracies, polls remain the only viable tool for explaining the 'why' behind voter behavior rather than just the 'who'.
• The failure of the polling industry suggests a future where leaders and the public may be 'flying blind' regarding social reality.

If polling doesn’t work, then we are flying blind.

• Reaching the electorate has become increasingly difficult due to technological and social changes.
• Polling remains the most rigorous method available for measuring public sentiment in a democracy.
• The polling industry is currently evolving to adapt to new challenges in data collection and communication.
• Public opinion data is essential for humans to understand one another and achieve common goals.
• Citizens are encouraged to participate honestly in polls to ensure accurate representation of the public will.

Acquiring a knowledge of these people is an important way in which humans manage to survive, get along, and come together to accomplish common goals.

• Political participation is defined as any action expressing an individual's political will, with voting serving as the primary mechanism for ensuring government representation.
• Despite record turnout in 2020, the United States lags behind countries like Sweden and South Korea in voter participation rates.
• Individual demographics such as age, income, race, and gender significantly influence the likelihood of an individual casting a ballot.
• Institutional barriers including complex registration laws, voter ID requirements, and gerrymandering can actively suppress or discourage voter turnout.
• Beyond voting, citizens build social capital and community reciprocity by volunteering, donating, protesting, and engaging with elected officials.
• Public opinion is a complex aggregation of views shaped by social factors and can be categorized into majority, elite, or issue-specific perspectives.

All of these activities contribute to social capital, which is the idea that individuals form connections that benefit their own interests and that these social networks in turn produce communities that create norms of reciprocity and promote more civil engagement overall.

• Public opinion serves as a vital communication channel for citizens to signal their policy preferences to elected officials.
• Politicians utilize public opinion data to strategically market their legislative agendas as the most beneficial course of action.
• Accurate polling requires probability sampling, such as random digit dialing, to ensure the sample reflects the broader population.
• Survey results can be compromised by measurement errors, including question wording effects and interviewer bias.
• Social desirability and response bias often lead participants to report inaccurate opinions rather than their true beliefs.
• Understanding global public opinion is a foundational requirement for successful international cooperation and partnerships.

Elected officials also rely on swaying public opinion in order to sell a legislative agenda to the public as the best course of action.

• Self-government relies on the principle that power is granted by the people through direct or indirect representation.
• Social capital, built through community relationships and networks, serves as a critical driver for effective societal functioning and political engagement.
• Voter turnout in the United States is influenced by systemic factors such as voter suppression and psychological factors like voter fatigue.
• Political participation extends beyond the ballot box to include donating money, contacting officials, and volunteering for causes.
• Public opinion is defined as the collective views that citizens are willing to express openly, encompassing majority, elite, and issue-specific perspectives.

voter fatigue feelings o f apathy that the electorate can e xperienc e under certain circums tanc es—for example , when the y are re quire d to vote to o often or are exposed to to o much politic al inf orma tion or negative new s

• The text outlines fundamental concepts of public opinion polling, including statistical sampling and the identification of various biases.
• It distinguishes between interviewer bias, where personal characteristics affect responses, and social desirability bias, where respondents hide true feelings to avoid appearing biased.
• Public opinion is framed as a vital tool for elected officials to understand constituent desires beyond simple voting patterns.
• The importance of public opinion extends to global politics, facilitating international cooperation and understanding.
• The section provides a comprehensive bibliography of seminal political science texts covering civic life, political knowledge, and social capital.
• A transition into Chapter 6 introduces the mechanics of political socialization, collective dilemmas, and the challenges of group decision-making.

Social desirability bias is when: People respond to surveys in a certain way so that they don’t seem biased.

• Greta Thunberg's activism evolved from personal family changes to a global movement involving 1.6 million students.
• Individual actions gain political power primarily when they inspire organized interest groups and party-level policy shifts.
• Despite widespread protests, rapid environmental policy change remains stalled by powerful opposing interests.
• A significant barrier to progress is the difficulty of reaching a consensus on specific actions even when the need for change is agreed upon.
• The 'free rider' problem and the exploitation of the global commons present persistent challenges to environmental cooperation.

To the extent that Thunberg’s individual actions will influence political choices, it will be because these actions have helped create a movement, inspire interest groups and parties, and lead governments to change their policies.

• Individual political action is insufficient for systemic change without the backing of organized groups or parties.
• Even powerful figures like emperors or national candidates rely on bureaucracies and collective support to exercise authority.
• Group behavior is driven by a mix of instrumental strategic goals and expressive symbolic motivations.
• Political movements succeed only when they overcome collective dilemmas to transform individual anger into organized purpose.
• The study of group activity must account for both rational self-interest and intuitive, public-spirited emotions.

Unless individuals come together with others, their ability to effect or resist change is miniscule.

• Political identity is rarely the result of a single, analytical decision but rather a gradual emergence over time.
• Political socialization is the slow process by which individuals develop their values, attitudes, and ideologies regarding government and society.
• Environmental factors, such as neighborhood safety and school quality, play a significant role in shaping an individual's political outlook.
• Emerging research suggests that genetic predispositions may also influence an individual's political leanings.
• The case of Greta Thunberg illustrates how family history, national culture, and external events like the Parkland protests converge to create an activist.
• Socialization determines not only what a person believes but also their level of interest or indifference toward political action.

Political socialization is neither premeditated nor preordained, although there is a growing body of evidence that indicates that there are genetic links to political predispositions.

• Social and physical environments, such as neighborhood safety and school quality, significantly shape an individual's attitudes toward government.
• The family is considered the primary agent of socialization, influencing lifelong views on religion, work, education, and politics.
• Political socialization is not always a top-down process; children can influence their parents' perspectives, as seen in environmental activism.
• In certain geopolitical contexts, such as Bosnia-Herzegovina, political identity is almost predetermined by inherited religious and ethnic affiliations.
• While family influence is substantial, individuals retain agency and may choose to accept, reject, or question the beliefs they were raised with.

Greta Thunberg’s activism led her parents to reconsider their own environmental attitudes, and research suggests that children often affect their parents’ views on the environment.

• Families serve as the primary agents of political socialization, though global family structures are evolving through declining fertility rates.
• China's one-child policy represents an extreme state intervention in family structure, resulting in significant gender imbalances and cultural shifts.
• Economic and social trends have led to a higher percentage of young adults living with parents, potentially extending the period of parental political influence.
• Cultural expectations regarding elder care vary significantly, with some nations viewing it as a family duty and others as a government responsibility.
• While parental influence is strong, approximately one-third of U.S. teenagers eventually adopt political ideologies that differ from their upbringing.

Under this policy, a cultural preference for male children led to sex-selective abortions and female infanticide.

• Parental engagement and strong party identification are primary drivers in determining whether children adopt similar political attitudes.
• Family structure, including marital status and living arrangements, creates complex socialization effects that remain partially understood by researchers.
• The influence of family on political identity is a lifelong process that continues to impact the socialization of adults, not just children.
• Schools and religious institutions serve as early environments that shape political maturation based on their specific philosophies and demographics.
• As individuals age, peer groups at school and work begin to replace parental influence, often leading to changes in language, interests, and political views.
• The internet and social media have fundamentally shifted socialization by allowing young people to find peer groups beyond their immediate physical geography.

Now, given internet access, young people can find their peer groups virtually anywhere.

• Social media has shifted the source of peer influence from local communities to global networks based on shared interests.
• The ability to choose one's social network increases the likelihood of 'echo chambers' that reinforce existing beliefs rather than challenging them.
• Dominant ethnic groups often view their political interests as universal, while minority groups may be socialized to view the government with skepticism due to discrimination.
• Ethnic identity becomes more politically salient when it signifies an individual's status as an outsider within a society.
• Religious upbringing remains a powerful agent of socialization, significantly shaping views on social policy and party affiliation.

One’s ethnic identity is likely to be more salient if that identity signifies one as an outsider.

• Gender roles significantly influence political socialization, where traditional expectations may discourage female political participation.
• The presence of women in leadership roles can actively socialize young women toward greater political awareness and activity.
• The impact of schooling on political socialization is often modest because schools typically reinforce the existing values and environments of parents.
• Political culture is defined as the shared attitudes, values, and goals common to members of a political group or country.
• National cultures are not uniform and are composed of distinct mass, elite, and minority cultures that vary by country.
• Individual socialization is deeply tied to group identity, leading people to join larger groupings with common characteristics.

Socialization into “traditional” gender roles may discourage women from developing interest or participating in politics, while in countries with women in leadership positions, young women may be socialized to become more politically aware and active.

• Political culture defines how citizens perceive their roles and their relationship with the government.
• The United States is characterized by high individualism, prioritizing personal freedom over state-guaranteed security.
• Comparative research shows Americans favor freedom from state interference, while many Europeans prioritize the state's role in preventing need.
• Generalizations about political culture describe broad patterns but should not be used to stereotype specific individuals.
• Local government meetings, such as city councils or school boards, serve as primary venues for observing and participating in political culture.
• With approximately 90,000 local governments in the U.S., citizens have numerous opportunities to engage in direct political action.

The United States tends to be highly individualistic, prioritizing personal freedom and individual responsibility over more community-centered values.

• The term 'elite' carries dual meanings, ranging from admiration for extraordinary skill to resentment toward those wielding disproportionate power.
• Political elites are defined by their wealth, status, and position, which grant them significant control over a nation's policy decisions and political agenda.
• The concentration of elite power varies globally, from the absolute control of North Korea's ruling class to the more egalitarian leadership seen in New Zealand.
• In the United States, elite cultures are fragmented across financial, cultural, and political spheres, often concentrated in major metropolitan hubs.
• Despite shared socioeconomic backgrounds and education, American elites are politically polarized, splitting their support between liberal and conservative causes.
• Regardless of internal divisions, political elites consistently exert a disproportionate influence on public policy compared to the general population.

North Korean elite culture is his culture, and he expects to be worshipped.

• Political science examines political culture as a specific subset of shared group values and practices.
• Cultural anthropology focuses on how human groups organize their social and physical worlds through shared belief systems.
• A defining methodology of the field is participant observation, requiring researchers to live within a community for extended periods.
• The discipline aims to create accurate descriptions of the knowledge people use to navigate their daily lives.
• Researchers study a reciprocal relationship where people shape their environments and are simultaneously shaped by them.

Cultural anthropologists study how people who share a common cultural system organize and shape the physical and social world around them, and are in turn shaped by those ideas, behaviors, and physical environments.

• Mass culture emerged through centralized media like newspapers and television, creating shared national tastes and political information.
• The distinction between elite and mass cultures remains, though the lines are often blurred by shared consumption habits.
• Mass political culture is weakening as evidenced by the sharp decline in viewership for presidential debates since the 1960s.
• The proliferation of media options and social media has caused mass culture to diminish while allowing specific minority cultures to flourish.
• Minority cultures and subcultures, such as doomsday preppers or anime fans, provide distinct identities that often remain unknown to the broader public.
• National political descriptions often fail to capture the diverse beliefs of the various communities existing within a single country.

As media options proliferate, mass culture diminishes and minority cultures flourish.

• Political cultures often emerge organically from shared lifestyles or interests rather than being intentionally designed as political organizations.
• Communities of interest, such as the gay community or environmentalists, can transition from apolitical groups to mobilized social movements in response to external crises.
• Cultural foundations, such as Black American culture or hip-hop, provide continuous links for long-term political movements like Civil Rights and Black Lives Matter.
• Cultural identity does not strictly dictate individual behavior, as people may hold strong beliefs while engaging in contradictory actions.
• The transition from mass protest to actual policy change is often hindered by the complexities of group decision-making and strategic behavior.
• Collective dilemmas and strategic interactions frequently lead to unfortunate consequences that prevent groups from achieving their stated goals.

Prior to the 1970s in the United States, the gay community (culture) was largely apolitical.

• Public approval of the U.S. Congress reached a historic low of 12 percent in 2021, reflecting a broader global trend of dissatisfaction with democratic legislatures.
• Disenchantment stems from the perception that legislative bodies are ineffective, often resulting in total government shutdowns due to political deadlock.
• A collective dilemma occurs whenever a group must reach a decision but members possess differing needs, preferences, or goals.
• Legislative failures are often the result of an inability to solve these collective problems, ranging from simple logistics to complex national policies.
• One primary cause of these dilemmas is the existence of opposing preferences where no middle ground exists, such as the binary debate over the death penalty.

The American public is pretty disgusted with the United States Congress.

• General agreement on goals does not prevent conflict, as participants often clash over the specific details and methods of implementation.
• Resolving the minutiae of collective decisions introduces significant challenges, including coordination, transaction, and conformity costs.
• Collective action problems arise when individual incentives lead members to make choices that harm the group's mutual interests.
• The rules governing decision-making, such as majority or supermajority requirements, heavily influence which side prevails in a disagreement.
• Supermajority rules and unanimity requirements protect the status quo by making it significantly harder to reach a binding agreement.

In this case, group members have a common interest or goal, but members of the group have incentives to make decisions that are actually harmful to the group and, ultimately, to themselves.

• Unanimity rules in jury trials represent the most extreme form of supermajority requirements in democratic legal systems.
• The necessity of a supermajority is often proportional to the severity and permanence of a decision's consequences.
• Requiring unanimous agreement in criminal trials serves as a safeguard against the state's power to deprive innocent citizens of liberty.
• Constitutions function as durable foundations that require supermajorities to change, whereas laws are more easily altered by simple majorities.
• South Korea provides a unique exception by requiring a 60 percent supermajority just to bring measures to a vote to protect minority party interests.

Think of it this way: constitutions are the foundations of the house, while laws are the paint in the rooms.

• Constitutional authors design rules that are difficult to change to ensure their vision for the country endures for generations.
• Making constitutions rigid serves a self-interested purpose by protecting current leaders' preferences even if they later become a minority.
• When collective decision-making reaches an impasse or fails to meet supermajority requirements, the status quo remains the default outcome.
• While rules shape outcomes, they do not determine them; shifts in public opinion, such as the rapid change in support for same-sex marriage, can drive policy changes.
• The failure of rules to resolve conflict can lead to the use of force and violence as an alternative to voting for accomplishing political goals.

Constitutional authors thus try to lock in their preferences in ways that will make it difficult for those with other preferences to change the document.

• Coordination problems arise when a group must agree on a common course of action that affects all members, even when individual preferences differ.
• The complexity of reaching a decision scales dramatically with the size of the group, moving from simple interpersonal choices to massive logistical hurdles.
• Societies generally solve coordination issues by either delegating power to a few individuals or utilizing collective participation like voting.
• Transaction costs represent the time, effort, and resources required to reach a group decision, which increase as more people are involved.
• High transaction costs can lead to decision-making paralysis, effectively preserving the status quo regardless of its merits.
• Strategic actors can intentionally inflate transaction costs as a political tactic to prevent any changes to existing systems or laws.

Defenders of the status quo do not necessarily need to defend it. They just need to raise the transaction costs high enough so that no changes can be enacted.

• Minority parties in both Texas and Washington D.C. have used procedural roadblocks to increase transaction costs and stall legislation.
• In Texas, Democratic legislators fled the state to deprive the majority of a quorum, temporarily halting new voting restrictions.
• The eventual passage of the Texas voting bill occurred only after the minority returned, thereby lowering the transaction costs of the vote.
• Collective action challenges often involve the difficult allocation of limited resources, including intangible assets like time and effort.
• Critical thinking is defined as the process of synthesizing data and diverse perspectives to reach informed conclusions on community issues.
• While critical thinking requires significant time and effort, it is essential for achieving better outcomes in public policy.

The minority’s strategy? Flee the state capitol, depriving the majority of the quorum, the minimum number of the group that must be present for a vote to be held.

• Transaction costs represent the time and effort required to reach a collective decision.
• Conformity costs are the difference between an individual's ideal outcome and the actual collective decision reached.
• There is an inverse relationship between these costs: systems that minimize transaction costs, like dictatorships, often maximize conformity costs.
• Personalized systems, such as individualized education, reduce conformity costs but require massive administrative transaction costs to manage.
• Democratic processes, like city council meetings, prioritize lower conformity costs by allowing all voices to be heard, despite the high transaction costs of long deliberations.

The lowest transaction cost occurs when a single decision-maker can rule by decree—for example, 'We will watch this movie.'

• Large group deliberations are inherently slow because hearing multiple voices increases the time and effort required to reach a decision.
• Including more voices in the decision-making process generally leads to outcomes that are better tailored to the group's collective preferences.
• The choice between minimizing transaction costs or conformity costs depends on the urgency of the situation, such as an immediate military threat versus a party platform debate.
• High transaction costs are acceptable when the goal is to ensure all interests feel heard and represented, fostering long-term group cohesion.
• Coordination problems differ from prisoner's dilemmas, where individual incentives actively conflict with the social good regardless of coordination efforts.

If a country is under surprise attack, for example, that may not be the best time for long, deliberative conferences.

• Collective action problems occur when rational self-interest leads individuals to make decisions that harm both the public and themselves.
• Unlike classical economic theory's 'invisible hand,' collective action logic suggests that individual pursuits do not always result in mutual benefit.
• The three primary categories of these problems are the tragedy of the commons, free riding, and the prisoner's dilemma.
• The tragedy of the commons specifically involves the depletion of finite, shared resources like fisheries, clean air, and wildlife.
• Free riding creates a barrier to changing the status quo because individuals benefit from group activities without participating in them.
• The prisoner's dilemma illustrates the difficulty of cooperation among allies when strategic individual choices result in suboptimal outcomes.

Collective action logic comes to the opposite conclusion, one in which individuals acting in their own self-interest can have incentives that lead them to act in ways that harm not only the broader public but also themselves.

• Individuals have a rational incentive to overconsume scarce public resources for immediate personal gain or profit.
• The paradox of the commons suggests that those who hoard resources ultimately end up with less as the resource is depleted.
• Commercial demand for high-value goods, like bluefin tuna for sushi, can drive species toward the brink of extinction.
• Strictly enforced catch quotas and regulations are necessary tools to avert resource collapse in shared environments.
• Global climate change represents the most urgent modern example of the tragedy, where no single actor has the incentive to reduce their impact alone.

In the paradox of the tragedy of the commons, those who seek to hoard resources ultimately have less even for themselves.

• The free rider problem occurs when individuals or groups accept benefits without contributing to the effort required to achieve them.
• While small groups can manage free riding through peer pressure, large-scale political groups find it much harder to identify and control.
• A paradox exists where a group has a collective incentive to reach a goal, but individual members lack the personal incentive to act.
• Climate change serves as a primary example of this logic, where countries may support change rhetorically but fail to make actual sacrifices.
• The tendency to favor the status quo creates significant barriers to resolving existential global threats like rising sea levels and extreme weather.
• Despite international agreements like the Paris Climate Accord, most nations are 'barely trying' as they wait for others to bear the costs of change.

Paradoxically, the group as a whole has incentives to work together to obtain their goal, but the individual members of the group do not.

• Global climate change efforts are hindered by individual nations' incentives to 'free ride' on the emission reductions of others.
• The Prisoner’s Dilemma illustrates how rational self-interest can lead to outcomes that are detrimental to all parties involved.
• In the classic scenario, two suspects must choose between cooperating with each other by staying silent or defecting by accusing the other.
• While the 'socially best' outcome involves mutual cooperation, the individual incentive to avoid the worst-case scenario leads both to defect.
• The predicted result of the dilemma is the worst collective outcome, such as a combined ten-year prison sentence instead of two.
• This framework explains why countries struggle to break the status quo of high greenhouse gas emissions despite the collective benefit of reduction.

The predicted outcome is the worst outcome, with 10 total years of prison time.

• The prisoner's dilemma is a classic collective action problem where individual rational choices lead to mutually harmful outcomes.
• Strategic communication and signaling can help individuals overcome the prisoner's dilemma by building trust and aligning strategies.
• Real-world political examples include negative campaigning and preemptive military strikes, where fear of a rival's advantage drives suboptimal behavior.
• Collective action problems are significantly easier to resolve in small groups where members have long-term personal relationships.
• Small groups rely on informal mechanisms like monitoring, social pressure, and mutual trust rather than formal institutional rules.
• The resolution of these problems is never guaranteed and depends entirely on the specific decisions made by the participants involved.

If you free ride by not pitching in to keep your living space clean, those living with you are going to notice and probably try to find ways to compel you to do your fair share.

• Small group dynamics rely on personal trust and visibility, whereas large groups face anonymity that encourages free riding.
• In a group of 40 million, an individual's lack of effort is virtually imperceptible compared to the obvious impact in a group of four.
• Large-scale collective action problems, such as the prisoner's dilemma, require formal political solutions rather than personal relationships.
• Global climate change represents a massive tragedy of the commons where industrialized nations emit significantly more CO2 per capita than poorer ones.
• The four largest political regions—China, the US, the EU, and India—account for over half of all global emissions.
• Averting environmental disaster requires each country to bear a fair share of the burden through monitoring and enforcement mechanisms.

If you try to free ride in a group of four, the other group members will definitely notice. If you free ride in a group of 40 million, no one is likely to perceive your absence or lack of effort.

• Governmental power offers two primary remedies for the tragedy of the commons: centralized protection through force or privatization via pricing.
• A central institution can prevent resource depletion if it possesses both long-term interests and the de facto power to enforce regulations.
• The United States attempted to manage bluefin tuna populations by requiring commercial permits, catch limits, and mandatory reporting.
• In an ideal scenario, governments would issue the exact number of permits at a price that maximizes harvest without depleting the population.
• Managing migratory species like tuna is difficult because they constitute an international commons that transcends national borders.
• Intergovernmental organizations like ICCAT often fail to protect resources when they lack the power to enforce rules or sanction violators.

ICCAT had the same basic goals and tools as the United States, but regrettably the organization had “no powers to enforce, no sanctions with which to punish,” and so it was ineffective in protecting the commons.

• Governmental control of the commons often fails because political elites prioritize their own interests over the community.
• Elected officials are frequently driven by short-term electoral cycles rather than long-term resource sustainability.
• Privatization faces intense political resistance from groups accustomed to exploiting resources for free.
• Economic pressures often lead governments to set resource prices too low, resulting in rapid depletion.
• High-value resources may require heavy policing and harsh punishments to prevent illegal exploitation.
• Historical examples like the extinction of the Moa bird illustrate the catastrophic potential of the tragedy of the commons.

And while emperors have reason to preserve the resource, believing their family will rule indefinitely, elected politicians are focused squarely on the short term—the next election—rather than on preserving the resource for their grandchildren’s generation.

• Carbon taxes aim to reduce emissions by making pollution costly, but they face political resistance due to immediate price increases for consumers.
• The effectiveness of carbon taxes is often undermined because the costs are immediate while the environmental benefits are long-term and delayed.
• Elinor Ostrom proposed that local communities can solve resource management problems without government intervention or market pricing.
• Ostrom's model requires collective decision-making and clear, enforceable rules that allow community members to monitor one another.
• While successful in small-scale irrigation and land management, it remains unclear if Ostrom's community-based approach can scale to global climate change.
• The lack of a global sovereign authority makes climate change an exceptionally difficult collective action problem to resolve.

Still, those costs are immediate, and the benefits are in the future.

• Small group sizes naturally discourage free riding, but large political entities must rely on formal monitoring and enforcement mechanisms.
• Taxation serves as a primary example where the threat of legal punishment and imprisonment is necessary to fund essential public services.
• International coordination, such as the G-7's 15 percent global minimum corporate tax, prevents entities from evading obligations by moving capital across borders.
• Beyond coercion, governments foster social solidarity and civic duty to encourage voluntary compliance based on the perception of fairness and competence.
• The 'tragedy of the commons' is particularly dangerous in slow-moving crises like climate change, where incremental damage may be imperceptible until it is irreversible.

In the countries with the highest tax compliance, citizens generally pay their taxes because they believe the tax system is fair and that it is a civic duty to pay your taxes.

• The prisoner's dilemma creates high-stakes risks where parties may choose immediate defection over cooperation to avoid perceived disadvantage.
• Cooperation is most likely when participants fear certain punishment from the other party or an external enforcer.
• Mutual trust is a primary requirement for cooperation, but it is fragile and easily destroyed by a single act of defection.
• Intractable conflicts, such as the Israeli-Palestinian struggle, demonstrate how tit-for-tat retaliation can replace the possibility of agreement.
• Rebuilding trust after a defection is significantly more difficult than maintaining it, often requiring third-party intervention to restore order.

It is easier to lose trust than to gain it.

• Political socialization is the lifelong process of developing political values and attitudes from youth through adulthood.
• Primary influences include family and friends, while schools, religious institutions, and social media serve as secondary agents.
• Political culture represents the shared set of attitudes, goals, and practices common to members of a specific political grouping.
• Societies are divided into elite cultures that dominate policy, mass cultures of the general citizenry, and various minority cultures.
• Minority cultures provide members with a sense of pride and solidarity, often leading to distinct political identities and activism.

The process is not deterministic; you cannot look at all the influences on your development and predict precisely who you will become.

• Groups face inherent difficulties when individual incentives conflict with collective goals, especially as group size increases.
• Democratic decision-making relies on voting rules that balance the importance of an issue against the proportion of votes required for change.
• Coordination challenges create transaction costs in time and effort, as well as conformity costs when individuals must accept outcomes they did not prefer.
• The tragedy of the commons and free riding demonstrate how self-interested behavior can deplete shared resources and undermine group efforts.
• The prisoner's dilemma illustrates a paradox where rational individual choices lead to a worse outcome for all participants than cooperation would have.
• Resolving these problems often requires external authority, privatization, monitoring, or the cultivation of social solidarity and trust.

Individuals acting on these incentives can harm the group and, paradoxically, themselves.

• Collective action problems arise when individual self-interest conflicts with the broader goals of a group.
• The prisoner's dilemma and the tragedy of the commons illustrate how rational individual choices can lead to suboptimal group outcomes.
• Decision-making efficiency is often hindered by transaction costs, representing the resources required to reach a consensus.
• Conformity costs represent the gap between an individual's ideal policy outcome and the actual decision implemented by the group.
• Political socialization is the lifelong process through which individuals develop their unique political personalities and values.
• Societal influence is often divided between elite culture, held by those with dominant power, and mass or minority cultures.

prisoner’s dilemma a scenario in which two individuals would benefit from cooperating, but each has strong incentives to defect, leaving both individuals worse off than if they had cooperated

• Collective action problems arise when individual incentives conflict with the best interests of the group.
• The prisoner's dilemma and the tragedy of the commons illustrate how rational individual choices can lead to suboptimal group outcomes.
• Small groups are more effective at overcoming collective action hurdles due to easier monitoring and stronger peer pressure.
• Government regulation is identified as a primary technique for resolving the depletion of shared resources.
• Collective decision-making processes often exhibit an inherent bias toward maintaining the status quo.
• The transition to civil rights discussions highlights the intersection of political culture and majority-minority relations.

In a prisoner’s dilemma, logic indicates that both participants will defect.

• Civil rights are defined as legal concepts within global constitutions that dictate how governments recognize and protect individuals from discrimination.
• Social justice movements like MeToo utilize public awareness and social media to accelerate pathways toward equitable legislation and policy change.
• Civil rights issues are primarily the concern of less powerful groups, including religious, racial, ethnic, and sexual minorities who are not in power.
• The distinction between civil rights and civil liberties is a fundamental framework for understanding legal protections and government obligations.
• Voting rights represent one of the most essential yet highly contested pillars of civil rights within constitutional structures.
• The protection of rights varies significantly across different countries and evolves over time based on shifting legal and social structures.

Often, civil rights change is rooted in local issues that become global, and social media provides new and accelerated pathways to equitable legislation and policy.

• Civil rights are government guarantees of equal protection for groups based on shared characteristics like race, gender, or age.
• While civil liberties are 'freedom from' government restriction, civil rights are 'entitlements' that require active government intervention to ensure equality.
• The Bill of Rights outlines individual liberties, whereas civil rights are enforced through legislative, judicial, and executive actions.
• Civil rights encompass political participation, employment opportunities, and legal standing within the justice system.
• Voting is a primary civil right that serves as a powerful tool for political voice; without it, marginalized groups remain unheard by public officials.

Public officials cannot consider voices they do not hear.

• Despite constitutional amendments targeting race, gender, and age barriers, voter suppression remains a persistent issue in the United States.
• New Zealand's history contrasts with the U.S. by granting voting rights to indigenous Maori men and women significantly earlier than American counterparts.
• The voting age is a fluid standard, with countries like Austria and Brazil lowering the eligibility threshold to 16 years old.
• Suffrage laws serve as an expression of a country's sovereignty and are a fundamental component of its unique political culture.
• Native Americans in the U.S. still face modern voting barriers due to specific documentation and identification requirements.

What these examples tell us is that, like many other civil rights issues, suffrage is not a rigid institution, but one that can change due to internal and external forces.

• Constitutionalism serves as a framework to ensure governments respect the rule of law and operate within defined limits.
• National constitutions often reflect specific political cultures, such as India's focus on caste discrimination or Mauritania's linguistic and gender equality provisions.
• The US Declaration of Independence introduced the concept of unalienable rights, influencing global movements and the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides a global standard, protecting against slavery and forced marriage while promoting freedoms of movement and unionization.
• Constitutional rights are categorized as negative rights, which limit government interference, and positive rights, which require government assistance to ensure well-being.
• Modern constitutions, like that of North Macedonia, utilize negative rights to explicitly prohibit state-sponsored harms such as torture, censorship, and discrimination.

Negative rights often correspond with civil liberties—what the government cannot restrict—and positive rights correspond with civil rights—what the government must protect.

• Constitutional protections vary drastically across the globe, with some nations recognizing only two rights while others codify nearly ninety.
• The Human Freedom Index measures the absence of coercive constraint, ranking New Zealand as the most free and Syria as the least free in 2020.
• A significant gap often exists between the rights written in a country's constitution and the actual enforcement of those protections by the majority.
• Political culture and the relationship between majority and minority groups are primary drivers of how civil rights function in practice.
• While many developing nations explicitly protect disability rights in their constitutions, the United States Constitution contains no such explicit language.
• The United States addresses disability rights through specific federal legislation, such as the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, rather than constitutional mandates.

The project’s sample ranges from the constitutions of Brunei and Thailand, which include only two individual and political rights, to those of Portugal, Serbia, and Ecuador, which include 87, 88, and 89 rights, respectively.

• The 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act established a global precedent for prohibiting discrimination and mandating accessibility in public life.
• Nations including Brazil, China, and Qatar have adopted similar legislative frameworks to create national standards for protecting disability rights.
• The United Nations defines minorities as groups constituting less than half of a state's population who share distinct cultural, religious, or linguistic traits.
• Most modern nation-states are composed of multiple culturally distinct groups whose traditions and historical experiences are often in conflict.
• Civil rights are fundamentally shaped by how the political majority chooses to exercise power and enforce protections for minority groups.
• Majority groups often leverage their electoral influence to secure the best outcomes for themselves and define the parameters of leadership.

The reality is that those in the political majority use their power to secure the best outcomes for themselves.

• Political culture is defined by the unique combination of a country's history, geography, religion, and power dynamics that shapes its specific political system.
• A nation's political culture directly determines which civil rights are protected and the degree to which those protections are enforced.
• Qatar exemplifies a conservative political culture where homosexuality remains illegal, creating a tension between local values and international expectations during events like the FIFA World Cup.
• Political cultures are not static; they can evolve through the combined efforts of nongovernmental movements and shifts within government institutions.
• The 2015 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges serves as a primary example of how decades of activism can successfully transform a national political culture to expand civil rights.

Political culture plays an important role in determining which civil rights the country protects and how well it protects them, and those with the most power are most able to influence the culture.

• The movement to challenge federal denial of same-sex marriage rights gained momentum during the 1996 presidential campaign.
• A 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court ruling that marriage denial violated the state constitution served as a primary catalyst for the national debate.
• American federalism is unique due to the 9th and 10th Amendments, which specifically clarify state rights versus national authority.
• States have the power to enact statutes that directly contrast with those of neighboring states, provided they do not conflict with federal law.
• The 2000s and 2010s saw a patchwork of conflicting state laws where marriage could be legal in one state but banned in the next.

That each state and region of the country has a different political culture and different people in power became all too clear in the 2000s and 2010s, when most states passed their own laws on same-sex marriage.

• Public opinion on same-sex marriage shifted dramatically from less than 40 percent approval in 2004 to over 60 percent by 2019.
• The AIDS epidemic and increased representation in popular media, such as 'Will & Grace', played pivotal roles in humanizing LGBTQ+ individuals.
• Increased interpersonal contact is cited as a primary driver for rapid attitude changes, as more Americans personally know someone who identifies as gay or lesbian.
• Legal milestones, beginning with Massachusetts in 2003 and culminating in the 2015 Supreme Court decision, codified marriage as a fundamental right for all.
• Majoritarianism describes how those in power often enact policies to secure their status, potentially suppressing the rights and political participation of minorities.
• The transition from minority exclusion to legal inclusion required decades of sustained activism, litigation, and public advocacy.

Those who have the power to shape society can use that power to help recognize and protect minority rights; however, those who have power tend to use the tools at their disposal to keep it, and keeping it may mean suppressing minorities.

• Majoritarian politics, while seemingly democratic, can lead to the systematic marginalization and loss of civil rights for minority groups.
• Groups lacking numerical, cultural, or religious influence are often subjected to discrimination and hardship by the majority.
• LGBTQ+ individuals face significant degradation from majorities who enforce traditional heterosexual gender roles.
• Despite global political shifts, many countries continue to deny same-sex couples fundamental rights such as child adoption.
• While the US Supreme Court affirmed same-sex adoption in 2017, only about 16 percent of countries worldwide currently allow it.
• Legal victories do not always ensure safety, as seen in South Africa where activists still face widespread discrimination despite legal protections.

World politics and history have shown how easily majoritarian politics can create hardship, discrimination, and a loss of civil rights for groups that lack the political, numerical, cultural, or religious influence of majority groups.

• Power structures maintain control by selectively silencing specific voices and limiting who can be counted in elections.
• Despite the 13th and 19th Amendments, states historically used Jim Crow laws like poll taxes and literacy tests to disenfranchise Black Americans and women.
• Modern voter suppression manifests through 61 documented forms, including strict ID requirements, gerrymandering, and the reduction of early voting opportunities.
• The Voting Rights Act of 1965 originally required states with histories of discrimination to seek federal approval for changes to voting laws.
• Following the 2010 election, there was a significant legislative push in several states to reinstate restrictive voting measures that disproportionately target communities of color.

One of the ways those in power can seek to remain in power is by controlling whose voices can be heard and counted in elections.

• The 2013 Shelby County v. Holder ruling significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act by removing federal oversight of state election laws.
• Following the Supreme Court decision, numerous Republican-led legislatures enacted new laws that restricted voter access and rights.
• Claims of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election persisted despite comprehensive investigations finding such fraud to be virtually nonexistent.
• Political rhetoric regarding election integrity culminated in the January 6 insurrection and a surge of restrictive state-level voting bills in 2021.
• Constitutional frameworks in countries like Sri Lanka demonstrate how religious majorities can institutionalize power despite nominal protections for minorities.

The Brennan Center investigated all reports of voter fraud in the United States and found comprehensively 'that fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is virtually nonexistent, and many instances of alleged fraud are, in fact, mistakes by voters or administrators.'

• Sri Lanka prioritizes Buddhism as the state religion, creating a dynamic where religious freedom becomes a civil rights issue for Hindu and Muslim minorities.
• Bhutan's focus on 'Gross National Happiness' masks the systematic exclusion and expulsion of the Nepali-speaking Lhotshampa minority.
• The Lhotshampa were rendered stateless after being forced to adopt the majority's language and dress, leading to a massive refugee crisis in the 1990s.
• The United States government seized over 1.5 billion acres of Indigenous land between 1776 and 1887, prioritizing majority interests over native rights.
• The U.S. federal government has breached the rule of law by failing to honor 374 legally binding treaties signed with various Indigenous nations.

The kingdom of Bhutan conducts a 300-question happiness survey every five years, and since 1972, the kingdom has emphasized Gross National Happiness as a priority for the country’s people. But Bhutan is not a happy place for minorities like the Lhotshampa.

• The US government seized over 1.5 billion acres of Indigenous land, though recent Supreme Court rulings have begun to recognize tribal jurisdiction in areas like eastern Oklahoma.
• For over a century, the US and Canadian governments forcibly removed Indigenous children to boarding schools for cultural indoctrination, resulting in widespread abuse and the extinction of 65 traditional languages.
• Native American women face disproportionately high rates of violence and kidnapping, with homicide being the third-leading cause of death for young Indigenous women and girls.
• Systemic failures in federal reporting and a lack of media attention, often contrasted with the obsession over missing White women, contribute to the crisis of missing and murdered Indigenous people.
• The loss of tribal lands often forces Indigenous people into the margins of non-Indigenous society, where they lack traditional support systems and face increased vulnerability.
• The text transitions to the forced internment of Japanese Americans during World War II as another major episode of civil rights infringement in US history.

Where as the c ountr y is often obsessed with s tories a bout true crime and missing White w omen , there has historic ally been les s attention p aid to missing and kidnapped women o f color .

• Executive Order 9066 led to the forced relocation of approximately 120,000 individuals of Japanese descent to internment camps during World War II.
• Two-thirds of those interned were natural-born U.S. citizens, many of whom had never visited Japan, yet their loyalty was questioned solely based on ancestry.
• The Supreme Court upheld discriminatory measures in Hirabayashi v. United States and Korematsu v. United States, prioritizing 'public necessity' over individual due process.
• The legal definition of Japanese descent was applied to anyone with at least one Japanese parent or grandparent, codifying racial profiling into federal policy.
• The internment represents a significant failure of the American system of checks and balances in the face of irrational fear and racial antagonism.

Pressing public necessity may sometimes justify the existence of such restrictions; racial antagonism never can.

• While often viewed as a historical issue, modern slavery affects an estimated 40.3 million people globally as of 2016.
• Modern slavery is defined by violence, loss of personal control, lack of free movement, and the absence of payment for labor.
• Forms of contemporary enslavement include sex trafficking, forced labor, domestic servitude, and the recruitment of child soldiers.
• Responsibility for eradicating these practices lies with a combination of governments, businesses, and individual consumers.
• Despite global efforts, slavery remains technically legal under the constitutions or laws of several countries, including Canada and Sweden.
• Activists Nadia Murad and Dr. Denis Mukwege received the 2018 Nobel Peace Prize for their work against sexual enslavement and the use of rape as a weapon of war.

The challenge of fighting slavery is compounded by the fact that slavery is still not illegal, as per constitutions or laws, in many countries, including Canada and Sweden.

• Slavery functions as a mechanism to maintain the power of dominant groups by systematically denying civil liberties and equal treatment to marginalized segments of society.
• The political institutions responsible for preventing abuse are often controlled by the same powerful groups that benefit from subjugation.
• A significant majority of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence were slaveholders, creating a paradox between their rhetoric of liberty and their support for slavery.
• The Three-Fifths Compromise codified the status of enslaved people as objects for population counting rather than individuals with inherent rights.
• Constitutional changes, such as the 13th Amendment, often require intense struggle or war and reflect slow evolutions in a nation's political culture.
• The legacy of early constitutional compromises continues to influence modern American perceptions of representation and census methodology.

This codified how the White American majority saw Black bodies—as objects that counted toward population, but not as people with their own rights.

• Democracies are uniquely defined by the diverse ways citizens can participate in the political process, ranging from voting to public protests.
• Civil rights movements often emerge as a response to systemic discrimination and violence targeting marginalized minority groups.
• Significant global social changes frequently begin with the personal responsibility and ethical responses of just one or two individuals.
• The concept of civil disobedience involves public, nonviolent, and conscientious acts contrary to law intended to change government policy.
• Individual actions serve as the catalyst for larger movements that eventually mobilize millions and gain allies among powerful societal segments.

What would have happened if these individuals had not drawn attention to what they saw as the unethical, immoral, or unequal treatment of certain groups?

• Henry David Thoreau’s philosophy of civil disobedience profoundly influenced global leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.
• Modern environmental activism continues the tradition of civil disobedience, as seen in the 2016 shutdown of German coal mines by thousands of protesters.
• Homer Plessy’s 1892 act of defiance against segregated rail travel was a coordinated effort by the Comité des Citoyens to challenge discriminatory laws.
• The resulting Supreme Court case, Plessy v. Ferguson, established the 'separate but equal' doctrine, providing a legal basis for racial segregation.
• The Court's ruling interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause in a way that permitted state-sanctioned racial separation for decades.

Plessy, who was one-eighth Black and “passed” as a White man, sat in the train car reserved for White passengers and announced to the conductor that he was Black.

• The NAACP and CORE pioneered organized civil rights actions in the United States, utilizing nonviolent civil disobedience such as sit-ins and boycotts.
• The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) expanded the movement's focus to include voter mobilization and equal treatment for women.
• In Czechoslovakia, Jan Palach's self-immolation in 1969 served as a catalyst for the eventual Velvet Revolution and independence from Soviet influence.
• The 2010 suicide of Mohamed Bouazizi in Tunisia sparked the Arab Spring, leading to the resignation of four Middle Eastern government leaders.
• While often associated with the 1960s, the American civil rights movement gained momentum from earlier events like the 1953 Baton Rouge bus boycott.

In 1969, seventy years after Homer Plessy’s protest, Czech university student Jan Palach signed a suicide note with the fictional name “Torch Number 1” and set himself on fire to protest the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia.

• The 1960s civil rights movement relied on a complex interplay between the presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court.
• Despite media coverage of violent police responses to peaceful protests, significant legislative resistance persisted in Congress.
• The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 stand as the era's most significant legislative achievements.
• The modern Black Lives Matter movement represents a shift toward decentralized, grassroots organizing compared to earlier institutional models.
• While mid-century movements focused on public access, BLM prioritizes eradicating white supremacy and state-inflicted violence.
• Social media has replaced traditional political institutions like churches as the primary tool for modern movement organization.

The movement has primarily used social media to organize marches, protests, and boycotts and to communicate with elected officials.

• Black Lives Matter (BLM) is viewed as the next stage of the civil rights movement, expanding focus from the consequences of racism to its structural origins.
• The BLM movement has successfully mainstreamed the term 'structural racism,' moving it from academic circles into the common lexicon.
• With an estimated 15 to 26 million participants, the 2020 BLM protests are considered perhaps the largest social movement demonstration in U.S. history.
• The Me Too movement, founded by Tarana Burke in 2006, began as a way to provide solidarity for young girls of color who survived sexual abuse.
• Me Too evolved into a global phenomenon in 2017 via social media, creating a massive online community seeking to address generational trauma and legal change.

Once confined to academic and activist circles on the left of the spectrum, [the term structural racism] has become the phrase du jour.

• The MeToo movement has united people globally across generations to challenge the historical untouchability of powerful celebrities and public figures.
• Generation Z has been instrumental in the movement's momentum, utilizing social media as a collective tool for self-organizing and wielding influence.
• Tangible legal progress includes improved formal procedures for victims, enhanced workplace protections, and laws restricting nondisclosure agreements in harassment cases.
• Despite global reach, the movement faces significant hurdles in countries like India, where institutional accountability remains low and justice is often inaccessible.
• While social movements spark the demand for change, the ultimate responsibility for addressing past discrimination lies with political and judicial institutions.

Youths are approaching power in new ways, wielding it collectively through social media and new vectors of influence . . . a self-organizing flash mob responding to a perceived problem or issue.

• Institutional racism is defined as racist laws and practices deeply embedded within a country's political, judicial, and bureaucratic structures.
• Because these practices are normalized within institutions, the majority group often finds it difficult to recognize their inherent racist nature.
• Political institutions are responsible for the equitable distribution of resources, and failure to ensure equal opportunity constitutes systemic inequity.
• The concept of intersectionality, developed by Kimberlé Crenshaw, highlights how overlapping identities like race, sex, and disability create unique forms of discrimination.
• Civil rights laws often fail to address marginalized groups effectively because they focus on single identities rather than the complex reality of intersecting ones.
• Powerful political actors normalize discrimination by deciding which groups are granted rights and which are denied them based on political culture.

Institutional racism refers to the racist laws and practices that are deeply embedded in a country’s institutions and that, because they are so embedded, have established norms that may make their racist nature harder for those in the majority to recognize.

• Legislatures reflect the national mood and can either enshrine marginalization or protect the rights of vulnerable groups.
• Judicial systems, particularly high courts with lifetime tenures, often have a more lasting impact on civil rights than legislative bodies.
• The 'justice gap' describes the phenomenon where 1.5 billion people live in nations with appropriate institutions but cannot obtain actual justice.
• India's Article 39A mandates that the state provide free legal aid to ensure justice is not denied due to economic or other disabilities.
• Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India allows citizens to bypass lower courts and appeal directly to the Supreme Court to redress fundamental rights violations.
• Unlike the United States system, PIL removes the traditional common-law requirement of 'standing to sue' to increase accessibility.

Long and Ponce call this inability “the justice gap.”

• Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and paralegal training programs serve as vital tools for marginalized groups to seek justice in resource-scarce nations like Sierra Leone and Malawi.
• Sierra Leone addressed a severe shortage of trained lawyers by empowering paralegals to handle property, criminal, and public interest issues.
• The Malawi model of paralegal assistance has been successfully replicated across several African nations to improve the civil rights of prisoners.
• The 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford decision remains one of the most infamous US Supreme Court rulings, stripping Black people of the right to citizenship.
• Chief Justice Roger Taney's majority opinion in the Scott case relied on the original intent of the framers to exclude enslaved people from constitutional protections.
• The legal definition of race in the United States was further complicated by the 'one-drop rule,' which classified anyone with minority ancestry as non-White.

Chief Justice Taney stated that whether an enslaved person was born free or into servitude, they were not entitled to any of what we would now call civil rights.

• The 1924 Virginia Racial Integrity Act established the concept of racial purity by classifying anyone with non-Caucasian ancestry as non-White.
• State-level racial classifications were used to deny minority group members the full rights and social privileges of American citizenship.
• The landmark 1967 Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia overturned bans on interracial marriage, a victory now celebrated annually as Loving Day.
• The 14th Amendment redefined citizenship to include all persons born or naturalized in the U.S., effectively nullifying the Dred Scott decision.
• While the 14th Amendment standardized citizenship, states still maintained the power to categorize individuals by race for decades.

Only persons who had “no trace whatsoever of any blood other than Caucasian” were classified as White.

• The 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause was established to prevent state-level discrimination and ensure citizenship rights for formerly enslaved persons.
• Japanese American survivors and their descendants faced a difficult emotional and political battle to secure a formal apology for World War II internment.
• President Gerald Ford officially terminated the internment executive order in 1976, labeling the policy a national mistake.
• The Civil Rights Act of 1988 eventually provided $20,000 in reparations to over 82,000 living internees following years of lobbying.
• While the executive and legislative branches acted earlier, the Supreme Court did not formally denounce the Korematsu ruling until 2018.
• The case illustrates that achieving civil rights protections requires significant shifts in public perception and pressure on elected officials.

Korematsu was gravely wrong the day it was decided, has been overruled in the court of history, and—to be clear—has no place in law under the Constitution.

• Executive leaders utilize both formal and informal powers to influence policy enforcement and national civil rights agendas.
• Formal executive power is exercised through codified actions such as executive orders, official speeches, and legislative signing statements.
• Informal power involves symbolic actions or personal remarks that carry weight due to the leader's status as the head of government.
• The case of Serbia’s Ana Brnabić illustrates that symbolic representation as an openly gay leader does not always translate into the formal power needed to change political culture.
• In the United States, Joe Biden’s 2012 endorsement of same-sex marriage serves as a prime example of informal influence shifting national discourse.
• Presidential appointments, such as Pete Buttigieg’s nomination to the cabinet, represent the formal application of executive authority to advance representation.

This is an interesting case study because by all accounts Brnabić does not have the executive power to actually change the political culture of Serbia—a concept discussed at the beginning of the chapter—even if her intentions were to advance LGBTQ+ rights.

• Canada's reputation as a multicultural nation is being challenged by historical and ongoing injustices against First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples.
• The discovery of mass graves at former residential schools has intensified national calls for the recognition of cultural genocide.
• Political representation for Indigenous groups is slowly increasing, exemplified by the appointment of Mary Simon as the first Indigenous governor-general.
• Civil rights issues arise whenever basic rights are denied to groups based on shared characteristics like race, gender, or ethnicity.
• Constitutionalism serves as a metric for how effectively a country adheres to its founding principles and legal protections for all citizens.
• Social justice movements often originate from marginalized groups joining together to challenge powerful majorities who benefit from the status quo.

However, the May 2020 discovery of 751 Indigenous children’s graves at a former residential school in Saskatchewan has reignited calls for more national recognition of cultural genocide.

• Political culture is defined by how a nation's traditions and cultural values shape its specific political system and power dynamics.
• The majority in a society holds the primary power to either uphold or systematically discriminate against minority groups.
• Civil rights abuses often manifest through the denial of equal protection and the creation of laws that favor the majority.
• Historical examples of abuses include the forced relocation of Japanese Americans and the loss of tribal lands for Native Americans.
• Despite legal provisions for suffrage, many countries continue to limit voting access and adoption rights for marginalized groups.

The majority can have a major influence on whether the government fulfills its obligation to affirm and protect civil rights.

• Collective action through mass political participation allows minority groups to exert power and achieve civil rights successes.
• Government institutions—legislatures, judiciaries, and executives—are responsible for creating and enforcing civil rights protections.
• Existing power structures and political cultures can harbor inherent racism or fail to understand how intersecting minority traits compound discrimination.
• Judicial systems can implement systemic changes, such as India's public interest litigation, to allow citizens direct appeal to the federal judiciary.
• Executive branches influence civil rights through both formal executive orders and informal symbolic actions.
• The three branches of government can act as checks on one another or collaborate to either advance or suppress minority rights.

In the United States, the three branches of government may serve as checks on the other branches, as when the Supreme Court strikes down an executive order, or they may work together—either for the benefit of minorities or to enforce discriminatory and abusive practices.

• Executive power is categorized into formal authority derived from constitutions and informal power generated through rhetoric and symbolic influence.
• Institutional racism is defined as the reinforcement of racist norms and values by government structures designed to perpetuate the status quo of those in power.
• The text highlights landmark Supreme Court cases such as Plessy v. Ferguson, Loving v. Virginia, and Obergefell v. Hodges that have shaped the legal landscape of equality.
• Concepts like intersectionality and the 'one-drop rule' illustrate the complex and often discriminatory ways identity has been constructed and treated in law.
• Political participation and global movements like Me Too are identified as primary drivers for instigating policy change and empowering marginalized groups.
• A distinction is made between negative rights, which limit government infringement, and positive rights, which the government is obligated to protect.

institutional racism the idea that, because government institutions are built and run by those in power, whose worldviews and goals aim to perpetuate the status quo from which they benefit, government institutions therefore reinforce norms and values that enshrine racist attitudes, policies, and practices to the detriment of marginalized groups

• The text defines 'separate but equal' as a legal justification for racial segregation in the U.S. from the late 19th century until the mid-20th century.
• The Three-Fifths Compromise is highlighted as a constitutional provision that dehumanized enslaved people by counting them as a fraction of a person for political representation.
• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) is established as a global standard for human rights created by the United Nations after World War II.
• The Velvet Revolution is cited as a successful 1989 nonviolent, student-led movement that challenged communist rule in Czechoslovakia.
• Review questions address the distinction between civil rights and negative rights, as well as the impact of landmark Supreme Court cases like Shelby County v. Holder.

Three-Fifths Compromise a component of the original United States Constitution that allowed enslaved people to count toward political representation according to the formula that one slave was equal to three-fifths of a free White person

• The text transitions from civil rights review questions to the study of interest groups and political parties.
• It highlights the 1990 reparations payments to Japanese internment survivors as a key historical example of making amends for past discrimination.
• A comprehensive list of suggested readings covers diverse topics including LGBTQ politics, disability law, and the Great Migration.
• The introduction to Chapter 8 focuses on the historic 1986 election of Senator Barbara Mikulski, the first woman elected to the Senate in her own right.
• The founding of EMILY’s List illustrates how political action committees (PACs) pool resources to influence electoral outcomes.
• The chapter aims to explore the complex relationship between organized interest groups, political party agendas, and the election process.

The name, which stands for Early Money Is Like Yeast (it makes the dough rise), was a nod to the understanding that in order to be effective in elections and in politics, people need to pool their interests, activities, and resources.

• Interest groups are organized collectives that seek to influence political outcomes or public policies based on shared concerns.
• The history of HIV/AIDS activism demonstrates how grassroots groups can provide essential services when the government fails to act.
• Groups like ACT UP and the Lavender Hill Mob illustrate how public pressure and direct action can force federal agencies to prioritize research and funding.
• Interest groups vary significantly in scale, ranging from massive organizations like AARP with 38 million members to local political chapters.
• The influence of interest groups is a global phenomenon, with organizations in Britain and France successfully lobbying for youth investment and digital privacy.
• These organizations are generally categorized into two main types: economic groups and public interest groups.

The history of group mobilization around HIV/AIDS illustrates how interest groups can harness the cooperation and collaboration of individuals in pursuit of a common goal, but also how multiple groups can work in concert to pressure the government to act.

• Economic interest groups focus on financial and industry-specific issues such as wages, job creation, and profit maximization.
• Business and labor organizations, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the German Trade Union Confederation, represent massive memberships to influence national policy.
• Professional and agricultural groups, such as the Japan Medical Association and the Irish Farmers Association, advocate for the specific needs of specialized workforces.
• Noneconomic groups organize around social or environmental causes rather than financial gain, including organizations like Greenpeace International.
• Public interest and single-issue groups champion broader societal benefits or specific solitary policies, such as advertisement-free public spaces or rice production.
• Civil rights and ideological groups, including the NAACP and the Democratic Socialists of America, work to protect minority rights or promote specific political philosophies.

The Japan Medical Association, with 170,000 members, is considered the largest and most politically powerful medical lobby in Japan.

• The Beijing government's crackdown on the Civil Human Rights Front illustrates how state repression can force the disbanding of interest groups.
• Pluralist theory suggests that interest groups form naturally as individuals engage in collective action to compete for political power and resources.
• Disturbance theory posits that groups emerge in response to external shifts in social norms, technology, or environmental factors.
• Transaction theory challenges pluralism by arguing that political actors primarily respond to the interests of narrowly focused elites rather than broad mobilization.
• The free rider problem and the nature of collective goods often discourage individuals from exerting the energy required to mobilize into formal groups.

In other words, political actors are not influenced by groups that have mobilized to enact change so much as they are responding to the interests of narrowly focused elites.

• The free rider problem occurs when individuals benefit from the collective goods provided by an interest group without contributing to the effort.
• The restaurant industry serves as a case study for advocacy, where groups like One Fair Wage fight against the instability of subminimum wages and tip-pooling inequities.
• James Madison's theory of pluralism suggests that competition between various interest groups prevents any single faction from dominating the government.
• Interest groups serve as vital communication channels, helping political actors identify which issues are of greatest concern to the general public.
• Participation in these groups builds social capital and allows marginalized communities to bring neglected issues to the forefront of political discourse.

It doesn’t take a calculator or a genius to see how unstable this wage is.

• Pluralism theoretically protects diverse interests, but often leads to factionalism where small groups override the majority.
• Economic bias creates a system where socially and financially resourced groups enjoy disproportionate political influence.
• Interest group membership is skewed toward the upper-middle and upper classes who possess the time and money for political activity.
• The 'chicken or egg' nature of these groups means they naturally attract wealthy members, further isolating disadvantaged populations.
• Interest group liberalism suggests officials respond to well-organized groups based on the strength of their demands rather than societal benefit.

The flaw in the pluralist heaven is that the heavenly chorus sings with a strong upper-class accent.

• Interest groups utilize lobbying to influence political outcomes and advance specific organizational goals.
• Lobbying is categorized into inside lobbying, which focuses on direct relationships, and outside lobbying.
• Professional lobbyists often transition from government roles to private advocacy, utilizing their insider knowledge of the legislative process.
• Political Action Committees (PACs) are used to fund attendance at events with lawmakers to secure opportunities for sharing perspectives.
• Effective advocacy requires critical thinking, strong writing skills, and the ability to understand diverse stakeholder viewpoints.

Giving money doesn’t mean that a member of Congress will do what you want, but it does often provide an opportunity to share your perspective on important issues.

• Interest groups influence the legislative and executive branches by providing testimony, drafting policy proposals, and mobilizing constituents to pressure officials.
• Lobbying the judiciary involves suggesting judicial appointees and filing amicus curiae briefs to inform judges of specific organizational positions on legal cases.
• Legal action serves as a direct lobbying tool, where groups use their resources to file lawsuits or appeals to challenge executive power or government policies.
• Outside or grassroots lobbying focuses on rallying public support through mass communication, recall efforts, and public demonstrations to pressure political actors.
• Radical activism, such as civil disobedience or extreme protests, represents a more intense form of grassroots lobbying intended to force attention on specific crises.
• The effectiveness and methods of lobbying are shaped by regional political structures, such as the prevalence of ballot initiatives in Switzerland or California.

Members of Extinction Rebellion go to extreme measures such as gluing themselves to planes in order to call attention to the climate crisis.

• Interest groups in certain systems like Switzerland often act as gatekeepers to block legislation rather than advocating for new laws.
• Political Action Committees (PACs) serve as the official fundraising arms for interest groups with specific contribution limits per candidate.
• Fast food corporations like Taco Bell, Wendy's, and McDonald's utilize PACs to donate hundreds of thousands of dollars to political candidates.
• Super PACs differ from standard PACs by allowing for unlimited spending as long as they do not explicitly coordinate with a candidate.
• Data shows a massive escalation in Super PAC spending, rising from $125 million in 2010 to over $2.1 billion in the 2020 election cycle.

For example, when you bite into a hard taco or a gordita from Taco Bell, did you know that you could be contributing to a political candidate?

• Super PACs emerged from the 2010 Citizens United ruling, which protected independent political spending as a form of free speech.
• These committees can raise unlimited funds from corporations and unions, often involving 'dark money' from anonymous donors or shell companies.
• While official records show a decline in registered lobbyists, experts suggest the actual population of influencers may be as high as 100,000.
• Legislative efforts like the 2007 Honest Leadership and Open Government Act and Biden's 2021 executive order aim to curb the 'revolving door' between government and lobbying firms.
• International lobbying regulations, such as those in the EU and Germany, often face criticism for being voluntary or lacking strict enforcement mechanisms.

Critics of this ruling complain that it has led to the rampant rise of super PACs, which empower the wealthiest donors and receive dark money.

• The Scottish National Party (SNP) is a center-left organization increasingly defined by its push for Scottish independence from the United Kingdom.
• Demographic data shows a significant generational divide, with 70 percent of Scots under age 35 supporting a break from Britain.
• Political parties are distinguished from interest groups by their primary goal of controlling government from within through the election of their own members.
• Scholars suggest that political parties serve as essential mechanisms for collective action and act as counterweights to the influence of external interest groups.
• Global party systems vary significantly, ranging from the American two-party system to Japan's single-party dominance and China's non-democratic ruling party.

Political parties are a means by which people agree to behave cooperatively over the long term so as to secure benefits that they would not have been able to gain as individuals.

• The 2020 election marked a historic shift in representation, with women making up nearly half of congressional candidates and securing a record 25 percent of seats.
• Political parties serve as massive financial engines, with U.S. parties raising nearly $2 billion in the 2020 cycle to influence policy outcomes.
• A primary function of political parties is voter registration, a task made difficult by the lack of automatic registration in the United States.
• Social and political crises significantly impact party membership, as seen in the Republican Party's loss of 140,000 members following the January 6 Capitol riots.
• The COVID-19 pandemic severely hindered political engagement, causing a 38 percent decrease in voter registration across many states compared to 2016.

However, the gains the party made during the run-up to the election were lost after the Capitol Hill riots on January 6, 2021, with the New York Times reporting that 140,000 members left the Republican Party in the 25 states that have readily available data.

• Political parties serve as essential gatekeepers by vetting and recruiting candidates for election, a function Professor Lester G. Seligman calls a basic party necessity.
• Candidate recruitment methods vary globally, with the UK favoring local government experience while US parties increasingly share this role with influential interest groups.
• The United States maintains a traditional two-party system where only two major parties have a realistic chance of wielding national political control.
• The United Kingdom is transitioning from a two-party dominant system toward a multiparty structure due to the rise of regional and smaller influential parties.
• Germany's political history illustrates a shift from a single-party Nazi and East German rule to a modern, diverse six-party coalition government.
• Single-party systems persist in the modern era in nations such as China, Cuba, and Eritrea, where one party controls all levers of government power.

A party that cannot nominate candidates is toothless in its power.

• Political parties have historically controlled candidate recruitment, voter mobilization, and campaign funding.
• The influence of parties has declined since the late 1980s, leading to a 'power vacuum' in American politics.
• Entrepreneurial candidates now bypass traditional party structures by self-funding or using personal media platforms.
• Ross Perot's 1992 campaign serves as a landmark example of a candidate-centered run that captured 20 percent of the popular vote.
• Critics argue that the shift toward grassroots power and populist politics has eroded trust in democratic institutions.
• Figures like Donald Trump represent the culmination of this trend, running outside traditional party platforms to garner mass attention.

These types of “entrepreneurial” candidates further weaken party influence in that they do not need to depend on the party for resources in order to launch a campaign or reach voters.

• Political party membership and activism are experiencing a long-term decline across established European democracies and the United States.
• Traditional party structures have been weakened by the rise of candidate-centered campaigns, deindustrialization, and new communication technologies.
• A significant 'flip' in party alliance has occurred where highly educated voters now support the left, while working-class voters increasingly support conservative policies.
• The erosion of traditional party systems has directly contributed to the rise of populist leaders in countries like Venezuela, Peru, and Indonesia.
• Institutional failings, such as reliance on patronage and being too close to the state, have alienated ordinary citizens from established elite groups.

Party alliance has flipped: those with higher education and income levels tend to be more liberal and support candidates on the left while working-class and less educated voters support conservative policies.

• Elections serve as formal decision-making processes ranging from local student bodies to national presidencies.
• Beyond selecting individuals for office, elections allow citizens to choose between specific policy preferences.
• Frequent elections are essential to representative democracy as they ensure a 'sympathy' between the government and the electorate.
• The competitive nature of elections forces candidates to be transparent about their objectives and plans.
• Elections act as a marketplace where voters can 'comparison shop' among candidates and interest groups.

Frequent elections are unquestionably the only policy by which this dependence and sympathy can be effectually secured.

• Elections serve as a primary bridge between political science theory and tangible civic action, offering citizens a direct voice in the democratic process.
• Civic engagement extends beyond the ballot box to include poll working, voter registration efforts, and active campaign volunteering.
• The economic theory of adverse selection applies to voting, where candidates often possess significantly more information about their true quality than the electorate.
• Information asymmetry is frequently exploited by well-funded interests, as seen in high-spending corporate campaigns to influence ballot initiatives.
• The concept of moral hazard in elections suggests that voting is an act of faith, carrying the risk that an official may not govern as promised or expected.
• Systemic issues such as voter suppression and the exorbitant cost of American elections can discourage participation and undermine democratic health.

In this way, voting is an act of faith and one that may bring you, the voter, risk or disappointment down the road.

• Illiberal ruling parties in the EU often discourage political participation from expatriates to avoid electoral threats.
• The United States has a persistent history of voter suppression, ranging from Jim Crow laws to modern restrictions on mail-in ballots and stricter ID requirements.
• Voter turnout is defined by the difference between the Voting Eligible Population (VEP) and the smaller pool of registered voters.
• The United States ranks significantly lower in voter turnout compared to other democratic nations, placing 30th out of 35 OECD countries.
• Demographic data shows that wealthy, older, and educated White citizens are the most likely to vote, while younger and minority groups show lower participation rates.

Illiberal ruling parties know that these diaspora groups could hurt them electorally and avoid encouraging, or have taken steps actively to discourage, their political participation.

• Political scientist Arend Lijphart identifies election frequency and weekday scheduling as primary institutional causes for low American voter turnout.
• The concept of 'voter fatigue' suggests that the constant cycle of local, state, and national elections leaves citizens feeling apathetic or disengaged.
• Unlike many European and South American nations where registration is automatic, the United States places the burden of registration on the individual citizen.
• Voter turnout significantly drops during off-year elections when there is no presidential race to drive public interest.
• Variations in state laws, such as registration deadlines ranging from same-day to 30 days prior, create inconsistent access to the polls across the country.

The frequency of elections leads to what some call voter fatigue, whereby the demands of multiple elections leave voters feeling apathetic or disengaged.

• Social capital, defined as networks that help citizens solve collective problems, is linked to lower crime rates and higher trust in government.
• Declining trust in government and perceptions of electoral system corruption are directly correlated with lower voter turnout.
• Encouraging group membership fosters community involvement, which has been shown to increase civic participation across multiple democratic nations.
• The 2004 Afghan presidential election serves as a landmark case of democratic participation despite threats of extremist violence and difficult terrain.
• The election of Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan defied expectations by transcending traditional ethnic, ideological, and linguistic cleavages.

Global media carried pictures of jubilant Afghans, their thumbs stained with purple ink that signified they had voted, and these pictures reminded all of us how important elections are in a democracy.

• The U.S. House of Representatives and state legislatures use single-member electoral districts that are required to be roughly equal in population size.
• The 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, shifted the selection of U.S. Senators from state legislatures to a direct popular vote by the people.
• The Electoral College determines the presidency, with each state assigned a number of electors equal to its total congressional representation.
• Most states employ a winner-take-all system for electoral votes, which can result in a candidate winning the presidency without winning the national popular vote.
• Maine and Nebraska are the only states that use the congressional district method to allocate electoral votes rather than the winner-take-all approach.

However, as we have seen in recent elections, the winner of the popular vote is not always the winner of the Electoral College.

• Most American elections rely on plurality rule, where the candidate with the most votes wins regardless of whether they achieve a majority.
• Some states, like Georgia, require a majority rule of at least 50 percent, necessitating run-off elections when no candidate meets that threshold.
• Proportional representation, which allocates legislative seats based on the percentage of votes a party receives, is often proposed as an alternative to the U.S. winner-take-all system.
• Duverger’s Law suggests that the American reliance on plurality rule is the primary reason the country maintains a two-party system rather than a multi-party one.
• International systems vary significantly, ranging from Japan's mixed-member proportional system to Thailand's military-appointed Senate.
• In extreme cases like North Korea, elections are compulsory but offer no choice of candidates, serving as a tool of state control.

Notably, America does not employ proportional representation at any level of elections, and according to Duverger’s Law, this is the reason why the United States also still has only two main parties.

• Direct democracy allows citizens to vote on policies directly through initiatives, referendums, and recalls rather than relying solely on elected representatives.
• While direct democracy is praised for representing the people's will, it is criticized for high costs and a lack of deliberative policy-making.
• In the United States, the federal system grants states significant autonomy to regulate their own election processes, leading to diverse voting methods.
• State-level variations include Oregon's universal mail-in ballots, Maine's ranked-choice voting, and controversial restrictions on Sunday voting in Georgia.
• The federal government's role is primarily limited to campaign finance regulation, election security, and protecting voting rights.
• Multiple federal agencies, including the FEC and the Department of Justice, oversee specific aspects of elections while respecting state jurisdiction.

Direct democracy is often lauded as fully representing the will of the people, but ballot initiatives, referendums, and recalls are also criticized for their costs and lack of deliberation.

• Poll workers serve as the essential gatekeepers of American democracy by managing check-ins and ensuring smooth voting processes.
• Many local jurisdictions face a chronic shortage of poll workers, leading nonprofits to step in with recruitment and training efforts.
• France maintains significantly stricter election regulations than the United States, including a total blackout on electoral propaganda starting the night before polls open.
• French law prohibits the media from broadcasting or commenting on any electoral polls during the active voting period.
• The French state strictly caps campaign finances and can reimburse up to 50 percent of certified election expenses.

Poll workers are sometimes called “the gatekeepers of American democracy” because they are often the first people to greet a voter who has arrived on Election Day to exercise their right to vote.

• The United Kingdom utilizes a flexible 'snap election' system where the prime minister can call for a vote at any time to capitalize on political momentum.
• British elections are significantly shorter than American ones, with candidates sometimes announcing their run only a month before the vote.
• A 'vote of no confidence' serves as a legislative mechanism to remove a prime minister and trigger a general election if the majority loses faith in the government.
• Interest groups are categorized into economic and noneconomic types, each seeking to influence policy through various theoretical frameworks like pluralism or transaction theory.
• While interest groups foster social capital and solve collective problems, they are often criticized for factionalism and an inherent economic bias toward monied interests.
• Lobbying strategies are divided into 'inside lobbying' through formal official relationships and 'outside lobbying' by mobilizing public support.

In Britain, the prime minister can call an election at will.

• Political parties serve as ideological groups that recruit candidates, raise funds, and influence policy across two-party, multiparty, and single-party systems.
• The influence of traditional parties is declining in the US due to the rise of candidate-centered campaigns and populist figures who bypass party structures.
• Elections are essential democratic mechanisms for expressing popular will, yet they are often compromised by information gaps and the influence of moneyed interests.
• The United States experiences lower voter turnout than many other nations due to factors like voter fatigue, registration hurdles, and the lack of a national holiday.
• Direct democracy tools, such as ballot initiatives and referendums, allow citizens to vote on specific policies rather than just selecting representatives.
• Election administration varies globally, with some nations using automatic or compulsory registration, while the US leaves most regulations to individual states.

In candidate-centered campaigns, candidates are increasingly less reliant on parties to run for office.

• Adverse selection in politics occurs when information asymmetry allows candidates or groups to control the narrative because voters cannot fully educate themselves.
• The rise of candidate-centered campaigns suggests that as political parties lose influence, individual candidates step in to fill the resulting power vacuum.
• Interest groups are categorized into economic types, such as business and agricultural groups, and noneconomic types, such as civil rights and ideological groups.
• Disturbance theory posits that interest groups form as a direct response to the increasing complexity of government and societal changes.
• The free rider problem remains a significant challenge for interest groups, as individuals may benefit from collective goods without personally participating in the group's efforts.

the idea that the declining influence of political parties and their decreased ability to mobilize voters’ opinions and actions has set voters politically adrift

• Interest group liberalism suggests that government officials respond to well-organized groups not for the public good, but because those groups are most effective at demanding action.
• The concept of moral hazard describes the inherent risk voters take that a candidate may betray their expectations once they have secured office.
• Electoral systems vary significantly between plurality rule, where the most votes win, and proportional representation, where governing bodies reflect the percentage of votes cast.
• Lobbying strategies are divided between direct influence and outside lobbying, which utilizes grassroots support to pressure political actors.
• Social capital is defined as the relationships formed within networks that enable citizens to mobilize and resolve collective problems.

moral hazard the risk a voter takes that a chosen c andida te ma y not , once elected, act in the w ay the voter hop es

• Super PACs function as independent committees capable of raising unlimited funds for candidates, provided they do not coordinate directly with them.
• Transaction theory suggests that political actors prioritize the interests of narrow elites over mobilized groups seeking broad social change.
• The text defines various electoral concepts including voter fatigue, voter suppression, and the distinction between the voting-eligible population and registered voters.
• Interest groups are characterized as organizations that influence policy and support candidates across party lines, rather than focusing solely on party victory.
• The formation and impact of interest groups are debated through pluralist, transaction, and disturbance theories.
• While interest groups allow for specialized advocacy, they risk amplifying minority voices over the majority and increasing the influence of 'dark money'.

transaction theory a political theory, espoused by Robert H. Salisbury, that argues that political actors are not influenced by groups that have mobilized to enact change so much as they are responding to the interests of narrowly focused elites.

• Political parties primarily focus on fundraising, candidate recruitment, and voter registration to maintain influence.
• The rise of candidate-centered campaigns and modern communication technologies has contributed to the declining influence of traditional party systems.
• Elections serve as formal decision-making processes that allow citizens to express preferences and hold officials accountable in a democracy.
• Systemic challenges in elections include adverse selection, moral hazard, and voter suppression.
• Election structures vary globally, with the United States utilizing an electoral college and state-level regulation, while Britain features snap elections and non-fixed dates.

What do adverse selection, moral hazard, and voter suppression have in common when it comes to elections?

• Legislatures are deliberative bodies authorized to create laws, but their functional roles are significantly more complex than simple lawmaking.
• The scope of legislative influence ranges from local city councils and state bodies to national congresses and supranational entities like the European Parliament.
• Key structural differences, such as parliamentary versus presidential and unicameral versus bicameral systems, fundamentally shape political outcomes.
• The text highlights a contemporary concern regarding the potential decline of legislative influence in modern governance.
• Legislative work involves intricate processes of organization and various methods for representing the interests of constituents.

When the term legislature comes up, people often think of national legislatures, such as the US Congress or the National Congress of Argentina.

• Legislators manage diverse tasks including drafting new laws, evaluating existing policies, and maintaining constituent relations.
• A key function of the legislature is oversight, ensuring that other government branches execute the legislative will correctly.
• Global legislative power varies significantly, ranging from purely consultative roles in non-democracies to supreme decision-making authority.
• Studying legislative behavior, such as voting patterns and committee assignments, is a primary focus of political science.
• Analyzing legislative processes fosters critical thinking skills, such as problem-solving and explaining complex, seemingly irrational situations.
• The ability to explain 'the why' behind political decisions is a highly transferable skill valued by employers across diverse career paths.

The ability to explain complex situations, to solve problems, and to make sense of situations that seemingly defy rational explanations provides the foundation on which you can build many diverse career paths.

• Legislative ideas originate from diverse sources including constituents, media investigations, advocacy organizations, and executive branch proposals.
• Individual legislators often develop specialized expertise and personal passion for specific policy areas, driving the legislative agenda.
• The role of a sponsor or cosponsor is critical, as they must actively advocate for a bill and build coalitions to secure its passage.
• Information gathering is a formal stage where legislators consult research and hold hearings to integrate stakeholder perspectives.
• The culmination of the process is the creation of public laws, which are formal texts designed to address issues affecting society as a whole.

It is quite common for a member of a legislature to develop a passion for and expertise in a particular policy area.

• Public debate is typically required before a legislature can vote on proposed legislation.
• Parliamentary procedures provide a structured set of rules to govern how debates are conducted.
• Key procedural rights include the minority's right to speak and the principle of addressing one business item at a time.
• The passage of ordinary laws generally relies on the principle of majority rule.
• Majority rule is defined as 50 percent of the chamber's membership plus one additional member.

Common procedural components include the right of the minority to speak in a debate, every member having the right to a vote, and only one piece of business being addressed at a time.

• Supermajority rules require a higher threshold than a simple majority for decisions deemed especially consequential, such as amending a constitution.
• Specific high-stakes actions like calling early elections in the UK or convicting an impeached official in the US Senate necessitate supermajority support.
• The US Senate's filibuster tradition creates a de facto supermajority requirement for ordinary legislation by requiring 60 votes to end debate.
• While democratic legislatures are characterized by free debate and independence, authoritarian legislatures serve different functions like ensuring regime stability.
• Authoritarian leaders may use legislatures to delegate policy-making authority or provide a controlled venue for key social groups to voice concerns.
• Legislatures exist on a spectrum of power, but they remain significant actors in both democratic and authoritarian systems of government.

Because any member can invoke a filibuster for any reason, there is essentially a de facto supermajority requirement for legislation to pass in the United States Senate.

• Legislatures require organizational structures to coordinate the diverse goals and conflicting solutions of individual members.
• Political parties serve as the primary mechanism for organizing legislative work and determining decision-making authority.
• Majority parties typically control the legislative schedule and committee seats, making their preferred policies more likely to pass.
• Minority parties in democracies provide an official platform for dissenting ideas and formal opposition to majority legislation.
• The number of parties in a legislature depends on the electoral system, often requiring the formation of coalitions to achieve a majority.
• Coalition governments are inherently more fragile than single-party majorities because the withdrawal of one partner can collapse the balance of power.

Every legislator has their own goals, things they want to take credit for, and blame they are trying to avoid—and everyone thinks they are right.

• The 2020 Irish general elections resulted in no single party achieving a majority in the Dáil Éireann.
• Fianna Fáil emerged as the largest party but required external support to establish a functioning government.
• A governing coalition was formed through a partnership between Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael, and the Green Party.
• Legislative seating charts often represent party seat counts rather than physical chamber arrangements.
• The transition from election results to governance highlights the necessity of multi-party cooperation in parliamentary systems.

Following the 2020 elections in Ireland, no single party had enough seats in the Dáil Éireann, the lower chamber of the Irish legislature, to form a majority government.

• Legislative committees allow lawmakers to specialize in specific policy areas, fostering deep expertise and more effective problem-solving.
• Committees facilitate legislative delegation, where lawmakers rely on the expertise of party colleagues when voting on unfamiliar issues.
• Small political parties often face higher workloads per member because they must maintain representation across all major committees.
• Professional legislatures operate year-round with full-time salaries and staff, whereas nonprofessional or citizen legislatures meet part-time.
• Nonprofessional legislatures often result in more powerful governors who manage state affairs during the long periods between sessions.
• The choice between professional and citizen legislatures involves a trade-off between legislative capacity and the desire to limit government expansion.

This tends to make governors in states with nonprofessional legislatures very powerful.

• Nonprofessional legislatures often face significant capacity limitations compared to professional bodies.
• The relationship between a legislator and their constituents is fundamentally shaped by the electoral system's structure.
• Single-member districts assign one representative to a specific geographic area, such as Canada's 338 ridings.
• Geographic representation allows legislators to become deeply familiar with localized issues and specific constituent needs.
• While single-member systems increase responsiveness, they may also exacerbate regional tensions and geographic divisions.

This type of system c an allow a legislator to become familiar with the particular is sues that affect their district and to potentially b e more resp onsiv e to their constituents; however, it c an also heighten geographic diff erenc es and potential tensions between regions .

• National-level districts, like those in Israel and Mozambique, treat the entire country as a single constituency to minimize regional bias.
• In systems without geographic divisions, political parties often exert more influence over policy than individual regional representatives.
• Multimember districts allow multiple legislators to represent the same geographic area, often with staggered terms or differing party affiliations.
• The United States Senate serves as an example of a multimember system where two senators represent one state but may belong to opposing parties.
• Denmark's Folketing demonstrates how seat allocation varies by population density, with districts ranging from two to twenty representatives.
• The debate continues over whether geographic or national districts produce more effective representation for the citizenry.

In Israel, voters indicate their preferred party, and regardless of whether they are voting in Eilat in the south or Haifa in the north, they are voting for and will be represented by the same politicians.

• Single-member districts divide a legislature into geographic areas where one representative serves a specific population.
• The US House of Representatives allocates seats based on state population, allowing states to draw their own district boundaries.
• Geographically clustered racial and ethnic minorities may find better representation through single-member districts.
• Multimember districts are often more effective at increasing the number of women elected to public office.
• Research suggests that larger multimember districts can lead to poorer constituent oversight and misaligned legislative decisions.

Some scholars argue that geographically based single-member districts can better represent racial and ethnic minorities because members of a community who are clustered together can elect a representative from that community.

• The demographic makeup of the US Congress has seen a significant increase in diversity, with the percentage of women and people of color doubling between 2001 and 2021.
• Global trends mirror this shift, with women's representation in legislatures worldwide rising from 18 percent in 2008 to 24 percent in 2019.
• Descriptive representation suggests that legislators with similar demographic backgrounds to their constituents may better represent those groups' unique life experiences.
• Substantive representation focuses on ideological and policy alignment between a legislator and their constituents, regardless of shared demographic traits.
• While descriptive representation increases the probability that a group's interests are voiced, it is not a guarantee of political alignment.
• Effective representation can occur across demographic lines, as legislators are capable of advocating for interests outside their own race or gender.

A woman whose parents came to the United States as refugees will have a different perspective on the world from that of a man whose family has been in the United States for generations.

• Edmund Burke identified two primary models for how elected officials represent their constituents: the delegate model and the trustee model.
• The delegate model requires legislators to act as direct messengers of their constituents' preferences, setting aside personal judgment.
• The trustee model empowers legislators to use their own knowledge and judgment to act in the people's best interests, even if it contradicts public opinion.
• The politico model represents a pragmatic middle ground where legislators balance constituent demands with their own expertise based on the issue's complexity.
• Foreign aid serves as a real-world example where legislators often act as trustees, supporting spending that is unpopular with the public but viewed as strategically necessary by experts.

In the trustee model, though the legislator should still learn about the voters’ preferences, once in government they must use their own judgment and knowledge of policy to decide what is in constituents’ best interests, even if it is contrary to those constituents’ views.

• The gap between public perception and factual reality, such as foreign aid spending, complicates the delegate model of representation.
• Legislators must decide how to weigh constituent preferences against their own judgment when public knowledge is limited.
• Partisan representation prioritizes the relationship between the legislator and their political party over the direct desires of constituents.
• The prevalence of partisan loyalty varies globally, with some systems demanding strict adherence and others allowing more individual freedom.
• Direct communication from constituents via letters, calls, or emails remains a vital and effective tool for influencing legislative priorities.

This gap between constituents’ knowledge and their opinions means that legislators must decide when, on which policies, and to what degree to weigh their constituents’ preferences against their own.

• Legislative oversight serves as a critical check on the executive branch, ensuring power is shared across the government system.
• Committees conduct hearings to monitor agencies and ensure their actions align with their assigned missions and policy jurisdictions.
• Parliamentary questions provide a formal mechanism for legislators to demand information from the bureaucracy, often with mandatory deadlines.
• Systems like the German Bundestag utilize both in-person questioning of ministers and written inquiries to maintain transparency.
• Unlike hearings, which require committee cooperation, parliamentary questions allow individual legislators to independently challenge government administration.

In these democracies, legislative oversight of the bureaucracy provides an important check on the power of the executive branch.

• Legislators can use written or oral questions as a potent tool for inquiry without needing cooperation from other members.
• Parliamentary questioning allows minority party members to launch investigations even when they lack committee control.
• Legislators are not restricted by committee jurisdiction and can ask questions regarding any policy area that interests them.
• The 'power of the purse' serves as both a carrot and a stick to ensure executive agencies comply with legislative priorities.
• Budgetary authority is a critical mechanism for legislative bodies to reward or punish agencies based on their performance and adherence to directives.

This 'power of the purse' is both a carrot and a stick that legislatures can use to gain compliance with their policy-making priorities.

• Legislatures vary significantly across political systems based on institutional features like the number of chambers and the type of governing system.
• The primary distinction between democratic systems lies in the relationship between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
• Parliamentary systems feature a close integration of powers where the prime minister serves as a leader in both the executive and legislative branches.
• Presidential systems maintain a strict separation of powers, limiting the executive's direct role in the lawmaking process.
• Semi-presidential systems combine elements of both models by utilizing both a president and a prime minister.
• The method of selecting legislators is critical because it determines whose interests and values will ultimately shape the law.

The answers to these questions matter because the method of selection can indicate whose interests a legislator will represent, as the person or people who put someone in power can have a decided impact on whose values and preferences shape law.

• Legislatures worldwide typically use one of three main electoral systems: proportional representation, plurality, or mixed systems.
• Proportional representation (PR) aims to reflect the population's political support by awarding seats based on the percentage of votes received.
• PR systems generally require multimember districts to allow for the division of seats among multiple winning parties.
• Brazil's lower house exemplifies a system that combines party proportionality with population-based seat allocation.
• Minimum thresholds, usually between 3 and 5 percent, are often implemented to prevent small fringe parties from entering the legislature.

The principle behind this system is that all preferences should be reflected in government, not just those views that have majority support.

• Plurality systems award victory to the candidate with the most votes regardless of whether they achieve a majority share.
• The French Parliament utilizes a two-round system to ensure the winner eventually secures a majority of the vote.
• Plurality systems are often viewed as straightforward but make it difficult for smaller third parties to gain political power.
• A significant drawback is that candidates can win office even when the majority of constituents voted for other people.
• In multimember districts, plurality voting allows voters to select multiple candidates to fill all available seats simultaneously.

Additionally, legislators can take office in these systems even if the majority of their constituents voted for someone else.

• Mixed electoral systems combine plurality voting with proportional representation to balance district-level distortions.
• South Korea serves as a prime example, using national-level proportional seats to compensate for unrepresentative plurality results.
• Regardless of the specific voting system, legislators remain ultimately beholden to their constituents or risk being voted out.
• Duverger's law suggests that plurality voting in single-member districts naturally trends toward a two-party competition.
• While Duverger's law limits competition at the district level, a national legislature may still contain many parties if regional dominance varies.
• Voters in plurality systems often avoid third-party candidates to prevent 'wasting' their votes on unlikely winners.

He practiced his idea that the proper role for a legislator was to be a trustee for his constituents and was voted out of office because people felt he did not sufficiently represent them.

• The United States has experienced several historical shifts in its two-party system, evolving from Federalists to the current Democratic and Republican parties.
• Duverger's Law provides a theoretical framework for understanding why third parties face significant structural barriers in the United States.
• Historically, U.S. Senators were elected by state legislatures rather than directly by the public, a practice that ended in the early 20th century.
• China's National People's Congress utilizes a multi-tiered indirect election system where delegates are chosen by provincial-level legislatures.
• Indirect election systems often result in representatives who are more closely aligned with political parties and other officials than with the general electorate.

This electoral design likely means that members of the National People’s Congress are more closely aligned with other elected officials and the political party than they are with ordinary voters.

• Executive authority to appoint legislative members varies significantly across different political systems, from absolute monarchies to democratic republics.
• In monarchies like Bahrain and Brunei, appointed chambers often serve to ensure the ruler's preferences are upheld or to act as a consultative body rather than an independent lawmaking authority.
• Some systems utilize appointed chambers, such as the Senate in the Bahamas, where appointments are made by elected leaders, creating a form of indirect public accountability.
• The power of appointed members can range from the ability to propose and pass legislation to merely approving or rejecting laws created by other bodies.
• Executive appointments are also used in democratic systems like the United States to fill temporary vacancies, though these appointees must eventually face voters.

However, because of the king’s role in selecting and reappointing members, members of the Consultative Council may feel an obligation to support or oppose a piece of legislation based on the king’s preference, rather than their own.

• The power of a legislature is fundamentally shaped by its relationship with the executive branch and the degree of independence between them.
• Presidential systems feature a strict separation of powers that prevents the aggregation of authority but can lead to political gridlock and conflict.
• Parliamentary systems operate on interdependence, where the executive is chosen by the legislative majority, facilitating easier lawmaking.
• The stability of parliamentary governments is fragile, as internal coalition conflicts or votes of no confidence can trigger new elections.
• Semi-presidential systems, such as in France or Sri Lanka, blend these models by sharing policy-making power between an independent president and a prime minister.
• While every system varies, the core tension remains the balance between governing efficiency and the oversight of power.

The weakness of the parliamentary system is that the stability of the government relies on a party or coalition maintaining its control.

• Oversight serves as a mechanism for the legislative and executive branches to supervise and limit each other's power to prevent corruption.
• Presidential systems utilize separate but overlapping powers, such as the legislative veto, to ensure no single branch gains absolute authority.
• In parliamentary systems, oversight is primarily conducted by the minority party through methods like question time rather than a separate branch.
• The effectiveness of parliamentary oversight depends heavily on the minority's ability to sway public opinion and encourage majority party defections.
• Legislatures are structurally categorized as unicameral, consisting of one chamber, or bicameral, consisting of two distinct chambers.
• Bicameral systems require two bodies with different procedures and powers to collaborate on policy and legislative responsibilities.

In a presidential system, each branch has powers separate from those of the other branches, but each also has powers that overlap with the other branches’, allowing one branch to step in to stop the excesses of the other.

• Unicameral legislatures offer a more efficient legislative process by requiring only one set of decision-makers to debate and approve bills.
• Efficiency in unicameral systems is often preferred in homogeneous societies where political parties are deemed sufficient to protect diverse interests.
• A major weakness of unicameralism is the lack of natural veto points, which can lead to unchecked power, especially in parliamentary systems with strong majorities.
• Bicameral systems are designed to reflect different voices and priorities, often splitting representation between the general public and specific territories or classes.
• The German system exemplifies bicameralism by using the Bundestag for public representation and the Bundesrat to represent state interests as unified blocs.
• Bicameralism acts as an internal system of checks and balances, ensuring that legislation surviving the process has broader institutional support.

The lack of a natural “veto point” is particularly apparent in unicameral parliamentary systems, where a prime minister with a strong governing majority faces almost no constraints from either a separate chamber or an effective minority opposition.

• Bicameral systems are inherently inefficient because legislation must undergo the entire investigation and debate process twice.
• The dual-chamber requirement significantly increases the probability that a bill will die before reaching a final vote.
• In the United States, the expiration of bills at the end of two-year sessions creates a high barrier for complex reforms like immigration.
• Gridlock frequently occurs when different political parties control each chamber, leading to ideological stalemates.
• The strengths and weaknesses of bicameralism are linked: the inclusion of more voices often results in a complete halt of the legislative process.
• Global legislative structures are split roughly in half between unicameral and bicameral systems, often influenced by geography and colonial history.

A system that, by design, allows for more voices can become a system where nothing can happen, as disagreement in the legislature can cause everything to come to a screeching halt.

• Political institutions are in a state of constant flux, evolving to meet contemporary demands.
• Legislatures worldwide face significant obstacles that hinder their prescribed roles within political structures.
• Internal and external forces, along with systemic issues, contribute to the weakening of legislative power.
• Executive dominance represents a growing shift in power away from representative bodies toward the executive branch.
• Legislative deference and political polarization further complicate the ability of these institutions to function effectively.

In many places around the world, despite all the powers that legislatures have and the vital role they play in our political structures, legislatures face significant challenges to their ability to play their prescribed role.

• Executive dominance occurs when leaders expand their authority through incremental changes or radical shifts during crises.
• The process often involves normalizing expanded powers until they are viewed as legitimate by the public and other government branches.
• This phenomenon acts as an external threat to legislatures by systematically reducing their policy-making power and oversight capabilities.
• In the United States, presidents increasingly use executive orders to bypass a polarized Congress on issues like immigration and border security.
• International examples, such as Vladimir Putin's constitutional changes in Russia, demonstrate how executive dominance can lead to lifelong rule.
• As executive overreach becomes normalized, the political system becomes less responsive to traditional checks and balances.

Regardless of the method of expansion, the act of executive dominance is gradually normalized, forming a new basis for understanding that executive’s powers.

• Legislative deference occurs when a legislature voluntarily yields power to another branch to avoid accountability for unpopular policies.
• Executive dominance and legislative deference are distinct but interconnected behaviors that erode the separation of powers over time.
• Political polarization acts as a systemic threat, driving political actors and voters toward ideological extremes.
• Rising polarization in legislatures often leads to gridlock, particularly in systems with slim majorities or coalition governments.
• In the United States, the decline of bipartisan cooperation since the 1980s has forced a reliance on complex parliamentary maneuvers to pass legislation.

Legislative approval that comes when the legislature has no option other than to approve the measure reflects the weakness of the legislature and poses a clear threat to legislative independence.

• The 2019 European Parliament elections highlighted a rise in both right and left populist parties.
• Extreme polarization in legislatures risks creating volatile swings in power between opposing ideological fringes.
• While clear party positions aid accountability, excessive gaps between parties can cause effective legislating to grind to a halt.
• Legislators come from diverse professional backgrounds including law, business, medicine, and the military.
• Public speaking is identified as a critical skill for all legislators, whether for campaigning or debating policy.
• Aspiring politicians can develop oratory skills through debate courses, acting classes, or activities like Model United Nations.

However, it is dangerous for legislatures when the gap between the parties grows so large that effective legislating grinds to a halt.

• Legislatures serve three primary roles: creating laws, representing constituent interests, and providing oversight of other government branches.
• The relationship between the executive and legislative branches defines the difference between parliamentary and presidential systems.
• Legislative organization is categorized as unicameral for efficiency or bicameral to ensure a wider variety of viewpoints are considered.
• External threats to legislative power include executive dominance, where heads of state overtake the authority of the lawmaking body.
• Internal threats like legislative deference and systemic issues like polarization can cause a legislature to voluntarily surrender its power.

When the people empower a branch of the political system to make the rules governing their relationship with their government, the political system is equipped to resist the ways that power can corrupt.

• Duverger’s law explains how plurality voting systems naturally gravitate toward a two-party political structure.
• Executive dominance occurs when leaders successfully justify the expansion of their powers beyond traditional limits.
• Legislative deference and delegation describe how lawmakers cede authority to other branches or rely on party experts to simplify decision-making.
• Electoral systems are categorized into plurality, proportional representation, and mixed systems, which dictate how votes translate into legislative seats.
• Legislatures vary in structure, ranging from professional year-round bodies to nonprofessional part-time assemblies with limited pay.
• The distinction between parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential systems defines the relationship between the executive and legislative branches.

executive dominance a phenomenon in which leaders expand their powers beyond their prior limits and are able to justify those expanded powers so that they are seen by many as legitimate and acceptable

• Legislative specialization allows representatives to focus on specific policy areas to develop expertise rather than maintaining broad knowledge.
• The trustee model of representation posits that legislators should rely on their own judgment even when it conflicts with constituent opinions.
• Supermajorities are often required for consequential decisions, demanding a higher threshold of agreement than a simple majority.
• In democratic systems, legislative ideas originate from diverse sources including lawmakers, the public, and specialized interest groups.
• Proportional representation systems award seats based on the percentage of votes won, contrasting with plurality systems that favor two-party dominance.
• Legislative committees serve to delegate decision-making to knowledgeable members and provide opportunities for leadership roles.

trustee a mo del o f representation in which a legislator relies on their own judgment when it differs from that of their constituents

• The text distinguishes between presidential systems, where the executive and legislature are separate, and parliamentary systems, where they are integrated.
• It explores the structural differences between unicameral and bicameral legislatures, noting that roughly 50 percent of countries utilize a single-chamber system.
• Bicameralism is often employed to provide representation for specific societal segments or subnational states, such as the German Bundesrat.
• Modern legislatures face significant challenges including polarization, legislative deference, and the expansion of executive power beyond traditional limits.
• Executive dominance is identified as a phenomenon that can occur across various political systems, not just within specific geographic regions.
• The section transitions into an analysis of different democratic regimes, including parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential models.

A phenomenon in which leaders expand their powers beyond prior limits is called: Executive dominance.

• Chief executives often receive disproportionate credit for successes and excessive blame for failures, regardless of their actual control over events.
• During global crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, citizens instinctively look to their national leader for solutions and leadership.
• Public perception of a single executive leader frequently shapes the overall approval and legitimacy of the entire government system.
• Democratic regimes are categorized into three main types: presidential, parliamentary, and semi-presidential.
• The classification of these regimes depends on how the head of government is selected and whether they serve a fixed term independent of the legislature.
• In presidential systems, the leader serves as both head of state and head of government, whereas these roles are often split in other systems.

When things go bad you get entirely too much blame. And I have to admit that when things go good, you get entirely too much credit.

• Democratic regimes are statistically divided into semi-presidential (39%), parliamentary (36%), and presidential (25%) systems.
• The executive function is split between two primary roles: the ceremonial head of state and the political head of government.
• In presidential systems, a single individual occupies both roles, whereas parliamentary systems typically separate them.
• Heads of state serve as vital national symbols that unify citizens through visibility at major cultural and sporting events.
• Despite their large share of global democracies, semi-presidential regimes are often excluded from primary study due to their high internal variation and definitional complexity.

While the position of head of state is largely ceremonial, images and symbols are extremely important, and the head of state provides a national symbol for a country’s citizens that works to unify a country.

• Heads of state serve as unifying symbols that represent the nation's identity beyond partisan politics.
• Major sporting events, such as the Olympics or the World Series, provide a platform for leaders to demonstrate national resilience and unity.
• President George W. Bush’s 2001 World Series pitch is cited as a pivotal moment of national healing following the 9/11 attacks.
• Heads of state provide essential legitimacy to a government, reinforcing the citizen's recognition of state authority.
• In systems where the head of state is separate from the head of government, such as the UK, the monarch's endorsement provides immediate political standing to new administrations.

I didn’t vote for him. But at that point, my personal feelings about him as a politician [were] gone. I watched him, and he was my representative.

• Chief executives in both presidential and parliamentary systems are uniquely held accountable by citizens for their handling of national crises.
• Public perception of leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic varied significantly, with Angela Merkel receiving high confidence ratings compared to Donald Trump.
• The 2020 U.S. election demonstrated how crisis management directly impacts electoral outcomes, with a majority of voters citing the pandemic as a critical factor.
• Presidential regimes offer clear accountability and perceived stability because voters directly elect a single individual for a fixed term.
• Despite the democratic appearance of direct elections, presidential systems may be more vulnerable to the rise of populist leaders.

This will always remain one of the best jokes of democracy, that it gave its deadly enemies the means by which it was destroyed.

• Presidential regimes are defined by a single head of government who is popularly elected for fixed terms, often with specific term limits.
• Term limit structures vary globally, ranging from single-term bans in the Philippines to Argentina's 'sit out' rule that allows for non-consecutive re-election.
• Populism leverages emotional appeals to the masses by positioning itself against perceived elite-dominated political systems.
• Scholars argue that democracy inherently contains the seeds of its own destruction by allowing the masses to freely choose demagogues.
• The structural differences between presidential and parliamentary systems may influence how easily populist leaders can rise to and maintain power.

In ancient Athens, thinkers of the age recognized that their novel system of democratic self-governance lived in constant danger—because by its very nature, in allowing the masses to freely choose their own leaders, it contained the seeds of its own destruction.

• Presidential systems often act as incubators for populism because leaders appeal directly to voters rather than through legislative parties.
• The candidate-centered nature of presidential elections allows outsiders to bypass traditional party gatekeepers, as seen in Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.
• While presidential regimes are more prone to populism, parliamentary systems in countries like Greece and Hungary have also produced populist leaders.
• Parliamentary regimes may be better equipped to prevent populism through stronger welfare systems and policies that address systemic inequities.
• Strong institutions in consolidated democracies can serve as safeguards to mitigate the influence of demagogues even after they take office.

The point is that democracy itself, and not simply a particular expression of democracy, is open to its own exploitation.

• Populism maintains a broad appeal across the political spectrum, as evidenced by both right-wing and left-wing movements in the United States and Europe.
• Demagogues pose a significant threat to democratic systems by attempting to alter the very electoral processes that brought them to power.
• Strong democratic institutions serve as essential safeguards, capable of withstanding challenges to the democratic process and legal system.
• Presidential authority is categorized into formal powers, such as vetoes and nominations, and informal powers derived from tradition.
• The 'bully pulpit' represents a key informal power, allowing executives to use their visibility to persuade the public and pressure legislatures.

Once in office, demagogues have the ability to attempt to change the system by which they were elected.

• Empirical analysis extends beyond numerical spreadsheets to include the study of observable facts like government longevity and policy outputs.
• The core goal of empirical analysis is to place individual facts into a larger context to understand broader societal patterns.
• A president's public approval rating is a critical component of their 'power to persuade' and their ability to enact a legislative agenda.
• Historical examples, such as Bill Clinton's early term and Jair Bolsonaro's vaccine opposition, demonstrate how low approval ratings can stall executive goals.
• The skills gained from studying executive systems are transferable to diverse fields like teaching and web design.

Mr. President, the American people have a funny way of deciding on their own what is and what is not their business.

• Parliamentary governments are formed based on legislative seat counts, where the majority party leader or a coalition leader becomes the prime minister.
• Political parties hold significantly more influence in parliamentary systems than in presidential ones, as the executive emerges directly from the legislature.
• Prime ministers possess substantial executive authority, including the power to manage their cabinets and dissolve the government to call for new elections.
• In systems without a clear majority, parties must engage in bargaining to build coalition governments, which is a common but complex feature of these regimes.
• Voters in parliamentary systems make choices based on party platforms and the understanding that their vote directly determines the executive leadership.

The personality of the chief executive is of less importance than it is in a presidential regime, though its significance is not eliminated.

• Parliamentary regimes differ from presidential systems by often lacking fixed-term elections, allowing for more frequent leadership changes.
• The average tenure of an Italian prime minister over the last 20 years is only about 845 days due to the flexibility of the system.
• A vote of no confidence can be triggered by policy failures, requiring a majority to either force new elections or the formation of a new government.
• Leadership challenges can occur within a majority party or coalition, specifically targeting the prime minister rather than the entire cabinet.
• The process of forming a new coalition after a government collapse can be incredibly lengthy, sometimes taking months as seen in Iraq in 2010.
• Even after losing a confidence vote, a leader like Sweden's Stefan Löfven can occasionally regain power by successfully negotiating a new coalition.

In a parliamentary regime, any failure of policy could trigger either a confidence vote or new elections, which could result in the removal of the prime minister.

• Parliamentary systems benefit from high party discipline, where members rarely vote against their party due to significant political risk.
• In parliamentary regimes, the prime minister is part of the legislature, ensuring consistency between the executive's agenda and legislative action.
• Presidential systems often face a 'strong early, weak late' policy cycle where legislation is heavily modified once it leaves the president's control.
• The unified nature of parliamentary government makes the passage of agreed-upon legislation nearly certain, unlike the potential for gridlock in presidential systems.
• While presidential systems offer stability and minority protections through separation of powers, parliamentary systems provide clearer accountability and better representation for minor parties.

It’s been said that, in the policy-making process, presidents are strong early in the legislative process but weak late in the process.

• Juan Linz's hypothesis suggests parliamentary regimes are more stable than presidential ones, despite the United States being a notable exception.
• Stability in this context refers to the endurance of the political system itself rather than the longevity of a specific administration or government.
• Parliamentary systems often face frequent elections and coalition collapses, as seen in Israel, which can appear unstable to those accustomed to fixed terms.
• Parliamentary regimes are more prone to rapid policy swings because new governments can be formed quickly in response to shifting public opinion.
• Research indicates that coalition governments with more parties may actually experience greater stability regarding long-term policy change.
• Perceptions of instability often depend on whether an individual views frequent leadership changes as a failure or as a sign of a responsive democracy.

What one person might view as instability, someone else might see as needed policy change.

• The formation of a new government, such as the coalition that ousted Benjamin Netanyahu, occurs within existing parliamentary structures without requiring institutional changes.
• In the United States, executive transitions involve forming a new administration and potential leadership shifts in Congress, yet the underlying constitutional branches remain static.
• Coalition governments are a unique feature of parliamentary systems that can be viewed as either a disadvantage or a strategic advantage for representation.
• Proportional representation in parliamentary regimes allows for a multi-party system where third parties can hold significant power.
• The U.S. presidential system effectively enforces a two-party dynamic, as seen in 1912 when Theodore Roosevelt's third-party run merely split the vote rather than securing power.

In a parliamentary regime, it is conceivable that Theodore Roosevelt would have been able to build a coalition with the Republican Party and form a government.

• Presidential systems are structurally prone to gridlock due to separate institutions that often result in divided government.
• While divided government does not make legislative stalemate inevitable, it creates a bias against the coalition building typical of parliamentary systems.
• Political polarization has increased significantly over the last 30 years, posing a threat to the enactment of public policy.
• Research suggests a curvilinear relationship where both extremely high and extremely low levels of polarization result in low legislative productivity.
• Divided government may paradoxically incentivize 'sincere negotiation' as each party seeks to avoid being blamed by the public for obstructionism.

When gridlock does happen, it tends to be highly visible, with each side publicly posturing and blaming the other side for the impasse.

• Presidential regimes naturally encourage two-party systems because the presidency acts as the ultimate single-member district.
• Duverger’s law suggests that plurality voting and single-member districts lead voters to consolidate around two major parties to avoid wasting their votes.
• Parliamentary systems with proportional representation allow for greater third-party viability and lower thresholds for legislative entry.
• Minority parties in parliamentary systems can wield disproportionate power by acting as essential coalition partners for larger parties.
• Voters in presidential systems often feel forced to choose the 'lesser of two evils' rather than their preferred candidate.
• Data from US elections shows significant voter dissatisfaction, with many citizens believing neither major candidate would make a good president.

In a presidential regime, however, large numbers of voters face the unenviable task of voting for a candidate who is less than their first choice, and voters often frame that choice as voting for the 'lesser of two evils.'

• Semi-presidentialism functions as a hybrid system where power is split between a directly elected president and an appointed prime minister.
• While the president typically appoints the prime minister, the appointee must secure a majority in parliament, which can lead to 'cohabitation' between opposing parties.
• Data suggests that semi-presidential regimes are generally less free than parliamentary or presidential systems and are more susceptible to authoritarianism.
• There is significant variation in freedom within this category, ranging from highly democratic nations like France to authoritarian states like Russia and Syria.
• Comparative freedom scores indicate that parliamentary systems tend to be remarkably freer than both presidential and semi-presidential counterparts.

That means the president could be of one party and the prime minister of a different party. They referred to it as “cohabitation.”

• Parliamentary systems demonstrate a significantly higher correlation with political freedom, with 80 percent categorized as 'free' by Freedom House.
• Presidential and semi-presidential regimes show much lower rates of freedom, both hovering around 38 to 39 percent.
• Semi-presidential systems represent the vast majority of 'not free' nations, accounting for 15 out of the 19 countries in that category.
• Data distribution reveals that parliamentary scores are highly concentrated at the top of the scale, whereas semi-presidential scores are widely dispersed.
• The lowest freedom scores are found outside of parliamentary systems, with Syria's semi-presidential regime earning a score of 1.

Finally, an intriguing picture emerges as one moves from parliamentary regimes to semi-presidential ones.

• Cabinets serve as advisory bodies for heads of state, but their influence varies significantly between presidential and parliamentary systems.
• In presidential regimes, cabinet impact is highly inconsistent and often depends on the specific president's personal preferences.
• U.S. cabinet meetings are frequently held for optics rather than policy formulation, as evidenced by delayed initial meetings in recent administrations.
• Influence in a presidential cabinet is typically derived from a personal relationship with the leader rather than the inherent power of the office.
• Parliamentary cabinets consist of ministers who are also members of parliament and must be consulted on all proposed government actions.
• The prime minister in a parliamentary system functions as 'first among equals' rather than a unilateral decision-maker.

Cabinet meetings take place more for optics than as meetings to formulate policy.

• Political events and current climates heavily influence how presidents and prime ministers select their cabinet members.
• In parliamentary systems, ministers are typically chosen from within the government and are expected to possess specific expertise in their assigned areas.
• U.S. presidential appointments often include individuals from both inside and outside the political arena, though members of Congress must resign their seats to serve.
• Recent U.S. data shows a shift in selection criteria, with Obama and Biden favoring government experience while Trump prioritized business backgrounds and populism.
• Presidential preferences regarding loyalty versus expertise can lead to unconventional choices, such as appointing individuals to lead departments they previously proposed to abolish.
• The selection process in presidential regimes is highly dependent on individual character and norms compared to the more institutionalized parliamentary systems.

For example, President Donald Trump chose former Texas governor Rick Perry to be his Secretary of the Department of Energy even though, during a 2011 Republican primary debate, Perry indicated he would abolish the department.

• Presidential cabinets typically lack a role in collective decision-making, with meetings often serving a purely ceremonial purpose.
• In the United States, cabinet secretaries focus on substantive oversight and policy implementation rather than advising the president's core strategy.
• Parliamentary cabinet members are deeply tied to the fortunes of the prime minister and their party, fostering a culture of unity and cooperation.
• Prime ministers in parliamentary systems maintain authority through the power to demote or fire ministers who do not align with the government's goals.
• Despite structural differences, both systems utilize cabinet members as heads of specific departments with defined areas of jurisdictional oversight.
• The independence of a cabinet member is significantly higher in presidential regimes compared to the partisan interdependence of parliamentary systems.

In a presidential regime, and especially in the United States, while cabinets have substantive areas of oversight, they are not included in presidential decision-making.

• Presidential cabinets are highly idiosyncratic, reflecting the individual president's preferences rather than a standardized systemic structure.
• Both presidents and prime ministers often utilize 'kitchen cabinets,' which are informal circles of trusted advisors used to bypass traditional institutional processes.
• In parliamentary systems, cabinet members are also members of the legislature, creating a structural link that is absent in presidential regimes.
• Parliamentary cabinet dynamics vary by leadership style, ranging from Margaret Thatcher's combative approach to John Major's traditional consensus-building.
• Woodrow Wilson once proposed a constitutional amendment to force presidents to appoint majority party leaders to the cabinet to emulate parliamentary efficiency.
• While cabinet members usually work in the background, specific department heads can achieve global significance, as seen with George Marshall and the Marshall Plan.

In essence, each cabinet is unique.

• Parliamentary regimes are increasingly resembling presidential systems as prime ministers gain power over their cabinets.
• The political fortunes of modern parties are becoming more dependent on the individual personalities of leaders like Margaret Thatcher and Angela Merkel.
• Professor Keith Dowding argues that policy-making is becoming centralized, shifting authority away from departmental ministers to the chief executive.
• Cabinet officials are increasingly viewed as heads of specific bureaucracies rather than broad political leaders.
• Bureaucracies, often criticized for being slow and impersonal, remain essential for the efficient and equitable enforcement of public policy.
• The tension between individual leadership and hierarchical 'rule by desks' defines the modern executive branch.

The term bureaucracy literally means 'rule by desks.' It is an institution that is hierarchical in nature and exists to formulate, enact, and enforce public policy in an efficient and equitable manner.

• While modern bureaucracy is a global phenomenon, China has utilized bureaucratic systems since the Qin dynasty in 221 BCE.
• In many nations, including Brazil and the United States, the government serves as the single largest employer of the workforce.
• The scale of the U.S. public sector is immense, employing over ten times the number of people as Walmart, the nation's largest private employer.
• Max Weber identified six core characteristics of bureaucracy, including hierarchy, job specialization, and impersonality, to ensure efficiency.
• The concept of 'neutral competence' is essential to modern civil service, allowing bureaucracies to both form and implement policy regardless of political shifts.
• Hierarchical structures are designed to speed up organizational action by reducing internal conflicts over decision-making power.

There are even individuals known as despachantes, or “expediters,” who help individuals navigate the maze of Brazilian bureaucracy.

• Division of labor within an organization fosters efficiency by requiring individuals to specialize in specific tasks.
• Standard operating procedures allow for quick, consistent decision-making based on established guidelines rather than personal inclination.
• Systematized record-keeping creates a body of knowledge that informs future policy and ensures service continuity.
• The norm of impersonality ensures all clients are treated equally, preventing favoritism based on social or economic status.
• Professionalization and neutral competence dictate that hiring and policy administration are based on merit and expertise rather than political loyalty.

In dealing with clients, bureaucrats follow the norm of impersonality by treating all individuals fairly, equally, and impartially.

• The United States bureaucracy transitioned from a patronage-based 'spoils system' to a merit-based civil service model.
• Under the spoils system, government positions were awarded as rewards for political loyalty rather than professional expertise.
• President Andrew Jackson championed patronage under the belief that government work was simple enough for any citizen to perform.
• The assassination of President James Garfield by a disgruntled job-seeker led to the passage of the Pendleton Act of 1883.
• Modern hiring relies on competitive examinations and technical knowledge rather than political affiliations or personal connections.
• While the U.S. uses a merit system, several European nations score higher on scales of bureaucratic professionalism and expertise.

In 1881, a disgruntled individual who did not receive the government position he believed he was promised assassinated President James Garfield.

• Policy consists of three distinct stages: formation, implementation, and enforcement.
• While traditionally seen as administrators, bureaucracies actively participate in the formation of policy.
• Bureaucracies operate under a dual-parentage system, created by the legislature but administered by the executive branch.
• The 'prodigal child' metaphor describes how bureaucracies often develop independence and ignore their political overseers.
• The 'iron triangle' model illustrates the symbiotic relationship between bureaucrats, interest groups, and congressional members.
• Bureaucratic autonomy is often reinforced by the specialized knowledge held by the actors within these systems.

As Truman noted: 'I thought I was president, but when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can’t do a damn thing.'

• Iron triangles consist of stable, mutually beneficial relationships between bureaucracies, congressional committees, and interest groups that often resist outside information.
• Critics argue that iron triangles are undemocratic and prioritize protecting specific interests over addressing broader public policy issues.
• Issue networks have emerged as a more common and flexible alternative, incorporating diverse viewpoints and specialized knowledge to handle modern policy complexity.
• Unlike the permanent nature of iron triangles, issue networks are often temporary and form around specific problems rather than shared institutional interests.
• Bureaucracies exercise significant power through rulemaking authority, which allows them to fill in the specific details of broad or vague legislation passed by lawmakers.
• The federal rulemaking process is systematized through the Federal Register, ensuring that proposed regulations are published daily for public transparency and input.

Iron triangles have been justly criticized for being fairly closed to outsiders and new information, for working in relative obscurity, and for being undemocratic.

• The rulemaking process for American wine labeling requires petitioners to prove a grape variety's validity, usage, and domestic growth.
• Public comment periods of 30 to 60 days allow citizens to participate in democracy by influencing policy tweaks and modifications.
• While agencies must respond to significant comments, they are not legally obligated to implement suggestions from the public.
• Business groups participate at much higher rates and exert more influence on policy outcomes than individual citizens.
• Street-level bureaucrats, such as police officers, exercise significant discretion in how regulations are applied and enforced in real-time.

It is the police officer, as a street-level bureaucrat, who determines the policy each day.

• Bureaucratic rules and protocols, though often frustrating, are essential for public safety and organizational integrity.
• The 2021 Memphis bridge inspection demonstrates how individual bureaucratic actors can prevent catastrophic failures by following proper procedures.
• Democratic systems are categorized into presidential, parliamentary, and semi-presidential regimes based on the relationship between the head of state and head of government.
• Presidential regimes are unique because the chief executive is popularly elected, serves fixed terms, and combines the roles of head of state and head of government.
• The 'power to persuade' and the use of the 'bully pulpit' are critical informal tools for presidents to shape public opinion and advance policy agendas.
• Presidential systems are more susceptible to populism, where leaders use emotional appeals to mobilize the masses against perceived elite rule.

In this case, it is not an exaggeration to suggest that the engineer who discovered the crack saved lives.

• Parliamentary regimes select a prime minister through the legislature, often requiring coalitions if no single party holds a majority.
• Prime ministers wield significant power but remain vulnerable to removal via a 'no confidence vote,' which triggers new elections.
• Presidential systems allow for quick action during crises and separate the judiciary from the executive, potentially protecting minority rights.
• Presidentialism often suffers from legislative gridlock and weaker political parties compared to the unified government of parliamentary systems.
• Semi-presidential regimes function as hybrids where citizens elect a president while the legislature selects a prime minister.
• Semi-presidential systems show a notable correlation with authoritarianism, though a direct causal link remains a subject of study.

If the prime minister loses the confidence vote, new elections take place.

• Cabinets serve as formal advisors and department heads in both presidential and parliamentary systems, though their legislative membership varies.
• Presidential cabinets often prioritize political loyalty and ideology over legislative experience, whereas parliamentary cabinets are more integrated into executive decision-making.
• Both systems frequently utilize 'kitchen cabinets,' which are informal groups of advisors outside the formal cabinet structure.
• Modern bureaucracies have expanded significantly since the 1800s, often becoming a nation's largest employer and affecting daily citizen life.
• The transition from the 'spoils' system to merit-based civil service has emphasized professional competence over partisan loyalty in administrative roles.
• Despite public stigma, bureaucracies provide essential stability through hierarchical authority, specialized expertise, and formalized rules.

Historically, these informal groups of advisors have been called “kitchen cabinets.”

• Bureaucratic organizations rely on hierarchical authority and job specialization to maintain order and clear divisions of labor.
• The 'iron triangle' describes the symbiotic relationship between bureaucratic agencies, interest groups, and Congress to protect shared interests.
• Democratic regimes are categorized into parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential systems based on how executive power is selected and distributed.
• The merit system and neutral competence aim to ensure government positions are filled by experts rather than through political patronage or the spoils system.
• Populism is defined as a political approach that uses emotional appeals to give a voice to the masses against perceived elite control.

iron triangle the relationship among bure aucra tic agencies , interest groups , and C ongres s that works to fashion public policy

• The text distinguishes between the ceremonial roles of a head of state and the executive functions of a head of government.
• Populism is defined by emotional appeals to the masses and is often triggered by systemic inequities or government inefficiency.
• Presidential powers are categorized into formal authorities and informal influences, such as the 'bully pulpit' and the power to persuade.
• Parliamentary systems differ from presidential ones in how leaders are selected, typically requiring the prime minister to be a member of parliament.
• Coalition governments and confidence votes are highlighted as unique mechanisms of parliamentary stability and change.

According to political scientist Richard Neustadt, which of the following is possibly the president’s greatest power? ... The power to persuade.

• The text evaluates the structural advantages of presidentialism, such as the ability of a single leader to claim a mandate and the protection of minority rights through the separation of powers.
• Parliamentary systems are analyzed for their capacity for rapid policy change and the inclusion of minority parties through coalition governments.
• The concept of 'cohabitation' is introduced to describe semi-presidential regimes where the president and prime minister belong to opposing political parties.
• The text explores the mechanics of governance, including the role of cabinets, the impact of plurality voting on two-party systems, and the phenomenon of legislative gridlock.
• Data from Freedom House is referenced to compare the prevalence of political freedom across parliamentary, presidential, and semi-presidential regimes.

In France, what term describes the situation in which the president and prime minister are from different parties?

• The text contrasts the ceremonial nature of cabinet meetings in presidential regimes versus the substantive nature of those in parliamentary systems.
• It identifies the 'kitchen cabinet' as a common term for the informal group of advisors that chief executives often rely on for guidance.
• Bureaucratic efficiency is defined through five core characteristics: hierarchical authority, job specialization, formalized rules, impersonality, and record maintenance.
• The transition from the 'spoils system' of political loyalty to the 'merit system' emphasizes the concept of neutral competence in civil service.
• The 'iron triangle' is defined as a powerful policy-making relationship between congressional committees, the bureaucracy, and interest groups.

Under civil service or the merit system, what is the primary concept at work? ... The concept of neutral competence.

• The judiciary serves as the essential mechanism for determining the legality of conduct and administering punishment through constitutionally ordained processes.
• The George Floyd case illustrates the tension between public demand for immediate action and the deliberate, procedural nature of the legal system.
• Understanding the specialized vocabulary and operations of the courts is vital to understanding how a country's government and society function.
• A key distinction in judicial studies exists between the 'rule of law,' where everyone is subject to the law, and 'rule by law,' where law is used as a tool of power.
• The chapter outline covers fundamental topics including legal systems, criminal versus civil law, due process, and the power of judicial review.

Lady Justice is traditionally shown wearing a blindfold to indicate impartiality, holding scales to weigh the evidence of guilt against the presumption of innocence, and wielding a sword as a symbol of power.

• Sovereignty is defined as the power of a governmental body to exercise the highest authority within a specific geographic region.
• The rule of law establishes that the government is beholden to its own laws rather than the whims of an individual or group.
• Dictatorships utilize rule by law, where a single entity creates and enforces rules arbitrarily, often leading to corruption and oppression.
• Robust democracies rely on accountability to ensure that no private or government actor is considered above the law.
• Just laws must be clear, publicized, stable, and applied evenly while protecting fundamental human and property rights.
• The delivery of justice requires accessible, impartial dispute resolution by ethical and independent decision-makers.

Throughout history, many individuals and small groups have become dictators with the sole power to create laws and punish people as they wished, thus employing rule by law.

• The social contract establishes a symbiotic relationship where citizens consent to rules in exchange for a government that limits its own power.
• Constitutions serve as the formal framework for government authority, defining how power is wielded and checked through various branches.
• The judicial branch acts as the mechanism for interpreting and applying the law, though its function varies significantly between political systems.
• In democratic systems, judicial independence and judicial review allow the courts to protect individual liberties and check government overreach.
• In authoritarian regimes, the judiciary often functions as a tool of social control, used to sideline opponents and bolster the regime's legitimacy.
• Authoritarian courts may also be used to facilitate trade or implement controversial policies while providing political distance for the ruling elite.

This creates a symbiotic relationship between the government and the people, rather than a system based on fear and oppression.

• The film Judgment at Nuremberg illustrates how legal systems can be co-opted to commit crimes against humanity under dictatorships.
• Rule-by-law regimes like Iran and North Korea suppress opposition by forcing the judiciary to adhere strictly to the leader's will.
• Authoritarian-populist judiciaries emerge when ruling parties dismantle rule-of-law systems to consolidate personal power.
• In Turkey, constitutional changes have allowed President Erdoğan to appoint and dismiss judges, effectively removing judicial independence.
• The erosion of the separation of powers leads to a lack of checks and balances, resulting in significant backsliding of democratic standards.

Under these conditions, the serious backsliding of the respect for democratic standards, the rule of law, and fundamental freedoms continued.

• Turkey's judicial system faces significant backsliding, characterized by a systemic lack of independence and the use of dismissals to intimidate judges.
• The distinction between the 'rule of law' and 'rule by law' is defined by whether a judiciary protects citizens from government overreach or serves as a tool for it.
• Unlike the executive and legislative branches, the judiciary lacks the power of the 'sword' or the 'purse,' possessing neither force nor will.
• The efficacy of judicial decisions in a rule-of-law system depends entirely on the cooperation of the executive branch and public respect for the law.
• Structural issues in judicial recruitment and promotion, such as a lack of merit-based criteria, can undermine the integrity of the entire legal system.

The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatsoever.

• The executive and legislative branches possess the proactive power to initiate investigations and enact laws based on public opinion.
• Unlike other branches, courts are reactive and can only take action when they have specific jurisdiction over a case.
• Jurisdiction is defined by written authority in a constitution or statute, covering both geographical regions and specific legal topics.
• Studying judicial systems develops critical thinking by requiring the analysis and synthesis of evidence, testimony, and legal components.
• Judicial selection processes vary globally but generally fall into four categories: lifetime appointment, fixed-term appointment, election, or hybrid models.

Courts, however, cannot take action on their own in the ways the executive and legislative branches can, and people cannot express their opinion in court unless they meet particular criteria.

• The United States Constitution establishes Article III courts where judges serve life terms to ensure judicial independence from other government branches.
• While Congress can alter court jurisdictions, it cannot reduce judges' salaries or remove them for their decisions, though the appointment process remains highly political.
• Lifetime appointments allow presidents to influence legal interpretation long after their terms end, described as shooting an arrow into a distant future.
• Global trends show a significant 29 percent increase in female representation on high courts between 2011 and 2019.
• Research indicates that a judge's gender may be a stronger predictor of judicial decision-making than their political leanings.

You shoot an arrow into a far distant future when you appoint a [US federal] justice, and not the man himself can tell you what he will think about some of the problems that he will face.

• European nations like the UK and Belgium utilize mandatory retirement ages, typically at 70, to balance life appointments with turnover.
• The United States is currently debating the implementation of term limits or mandatory retirement for Article III judges to mirror international standards.
• Some judicial systems, such as France's, require rigorous entrance examinations and specialized training overseen by the Ministry of Justice rather than executive appointment.
• Judicial elections in the US are viewed as an international anomaly, often criticized for compromising judicial independence in favor of political popularity.
• States are increasingly shifting from direct partisan elections toward retention elections to mitigate the pressure of political campaigning on the bench.

To the rest of the world, American adherence to judicial elections is as incomprehensible as our rejection of the metric system.

• Texas remains one of the few states utilizing partisan elections for judgeships, leading to concerns about political favoritism and campaign donor influence.
• Critics of partisan judicial elections argue that the system prioritizes political popularity over legal expertise and creates an appearance of impropriety.
• Nonpartisan elections are used in thirteen states as a compromise to allow public participation while theoretically reducing party influence.
• International models vary significantly, with Switzerland utilizing legislative elections and Japan employing a mix of cabinet appointments and popular referendums.
• The Missouri Plan, or retention system, has gained popularity in the U.S. by combining executive appointment with a non-competitive public vote on the judge's record.

Texas has been the object of scrutiny for allegations of favoritism to campaign donors and political party influence on judges.

• Courts lack the power to implement their own decisions and must rely on other government branches to translate rulings into statutes or orders.
• Judicial action is reactive rather than proactive, requiring a specific dispute or 'case' to be filed before a court can intervene.
• Individuals only gain 'standing' to challenge a law once they have suffered a direct injury or have been charged with violating that law.
• The scope of a court's decision is strictly limited to the specific issues and evidence presented by the parties involved in the litigation.
• In civil matters, courts can only provide assistance if there is an existing written statute that allows for the filing of a specific claim.

You cannot go to court to challenge a law just because you disagree with it.

• Judicial implementation is the process of putting court judgments into practice through enforcement.
• Courts lack the physical power to compel government personnel and must rely on the executive branch to enforce orders.
• The executive branch's willingness to recognize a court's authority is essential for a judgment to have any practical force.
• Public acceptance of the rule of law is the judiciary's most significant enforcement power, as widespread resistance can defeat court orders.
• The desegregation of American schools serves as a primary example where executive intervention was required to overcome local resistance.
• Without backing from the legislative and executive branches, public backlash can effectively nullify judicial decisions.

A court can issue a judgment, or legal order, but it does not have the power to compel government personnel to carry out or enforce its orders.

• The 1957 Little Rock Central High School crisis illustrates how executive power can be used to either defy or enforce judicial desegregation orders.
• Nullification occurs when governments refuse to obey court orders or statutes, effectively rendering the law toothless because courts lack independent enforcement power.
• Modern marijuana legalization serves as a primary example of federal authorities choosing not to enforce federal law, thereby engaging in a form of active nullification.
• While nullification may be popular in certain contexts, it poses a significant threat to the rule of law by allowing entities to decide which laws they will follow.
• The legislative branch can legally counter court decisions by enacting new statutes or proposing constitutional amendments, as seen with the federal income tax.

Nullification damages the rule of law; if states and individuals decide independently that they do not have to obey a law, without following the processes designed to ensure that no one is above the law, then the rule of law itself is weakened.

• Major court decisions serve as catalysts for social reform by providing legal precedents that activists use to gain public support.
• The Brown v. Board of Education ruling illustrates how incremental legal victories can eventually dismantle long-standing doctrines like 'separate but equal.'
• While courts do not proactively create policy like the legislative branch, their interpretations of specific cases effectively nudge social and political policies.
• Judicial decisions can bring marginalized issues into the majority's conscience, as seen when Brown invigorated the nascent civil rights movement.
• The extrajudicial influence of the court is indirect, often requiring subsequent legislative action like the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to achieve comprehensive change.
• There is an ongoing debate regarding the extent of judicial impact, yet significant rulings undeniably force society to reconsider issues in new ways.

It can bring attention to an issue that may have been at the margins of the majority’s conscience.

• The world's legal frameworks are categorized into five primary types: civil, common, customary, religious, and hybrid systems.
• Common law systems, originating from British rule, were historically based on judge-made law used to fill gaps in unwritten statutes.
• Modern common law relies heavily on 'stare decisis', the principle of using past judicial precedents to interpret and apply current written laws.
• The common law court process is fundamentally adversarial, characterized by a 'winner-takes-all' attitude where opposing sides manage their own investigations.
• In this adversarial framework, judges act as moderators of legal issues while juries or judges-as-fact-finders determine the truth of the evidence presented.

Common law courts are adversarial; that is, there is a winner-takes-all attitude in the court.

• Civil law systems prioritize comprehensive legal codes over judicial precedent, making court decisions binding only to the specific parties involved.
• The civil law process is inquisitorial rather than adversarial, with judges leading investigations, questioning witnesses, and gathering evidence.
• Juries in civil law systems are rare and often consist of subject-matter experts rather than members of the general public.
• Religious law systems derive their primary authority from sacred texts, such as the Koran in Saudi Arabia, which serve as the basis for all statutes.
• In religious systems, legal specialists or religious leaders often have the power to overrule government acts or court decisions based on spiritual tenets.
• Some nations, like Israel, utilize a hybrid approach where religious courts handle specific family law matters while secular courts manage other legal issues.

The system is more inquisitorial than adversarial.

• Customary law systems are built upon long-standing traditions that have become deeply ingrained and legally enforceable within specific communities.
• Unlike civil or common law, customary laws are often unwritten and are typically implemented by group leaders rather than government officials.
• In the modern era, customary law usually exists as part of a hybrid system, functioning alongside established government legal frameworks.
• Andorra serves as a prime example, blending canon, Roman, and various European laws into a parliamentary co-principality system.
• The island of Guernsey maintains a unique legal identity derived from medieval Norman law, independent of the United Kingdom's legal structure.
• Legal systems globally vary significantly in judicial independence and policy-making roles based on whether they follow common, civil, religious, or customary traditions.

As a result, customary laws are typically unwritten and revealed only to group members.

• Customary legal systems are increasingly recognized worldwide, allowing indigenous groups like the Maori in New Zealand to apply ancient laws to internal affairs.
• Hybrid legal systems combine multiple legal traditions, such as Louisiana's mix of French civil law and American common law.
• The Philippines represents a complex mixed system incorporating civil, common, sharia, and indigenous customary laws due to its unique history.
• Criminal law is defined as offenses against the state that harm society, requiring specific written statutes to establish an act as a crime.
• Civil law governs disputes between individuals seeking compensation for harm, rather than state-led prosecution.
• Criminal punishment serves five primary societal purposes: incapacitation, retribution, deterrence, restitution, and rehabilitation.

An act is not a crime unless a written law establishes it as one.

• Many nations are shifting their criminal justice focus toward rehabilitation, particularly for nonviolent and drug-related offenses.
• Criminal law distinguishes between serious offenses, known as felonies, and less serious offenses, known as misdemeanors.
• Misdemeanors are typically punished by fines or short-term jail sentences of less than one year served in local facilities.
• Felonies carry more severe penalties ranging from one year in prison to life imprisonment or the death penalty.
• The United States federal sentencing guidelines categorize crimes into specific classes based on the perceived severity of the act.
• International legal systems vary significantly in how they divide trial processes and define the boundaries between serious and lesser punishments.

Many countries have moved to a focus on rehabilitation as a means of stopping future crime.

• Ex post facto laws are prohibited in rule-of-law countries, meaning the government cannot punish individuals for actions that were legal when committed.
• The burden of proof in criminal cases rests entirely on the government and must meet the high standard of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
• The US Constitution provides specific protections including habeas corpus, the right to a speedy trial, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
• Authoritarian regimes often use retroactive laws and the lack of habeas corpus to indefinitely detain political opponents.
• Over 100 countries require police to inform suspects of their rights upon arrest, similar to the American Miranda warning.

In rule-by-law systems, authoritarian governments often use ex post facto laws and the lack of habeas corpus to jail opponents and keep them in jail indefinitely.

• Police must convey the core meaning of Miranda rights in a language the suspect understands, though no specific script is legally mandated.
• The right to remain silent is not automatic; suspects must explicitly state their wish to remain silent and may inadvertently waive it by speaking.
• Miranda protections apply specifically to direct police interrogation and do not prevent officers from using trickery or speaking in the suspect's presence.
• The United Kingdom's warning differs from the US by noting that remaining silent can actually harm a defendant's case if they later rely on a defense not mentioned during questioning.
• UK procedural rights are more explicit than US rights, requiring custody officers to inform detainees of their right to medical help and regular breaks.

It does not apply to forensic investigative work, and it does not preclude police officers from speaking in front of the person who is under arrest or trying to trick them into saying something.

• Rule-of-law systems protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by requiring probable cause, a standard higher than suspicion but lower than guilt.
• The right to privacy and the right to be left alone are foundational principles that limit police power in democratic societies.
• A writ of habeas corpus ensures that detained individuals must be brought before a court to hear the charges against them, preventing indefinite detention.
• Rule-by-law countries often lack these protections, allowing the state to search property or imprison individuals indefinitely without legal recourse.
• The arraignment process and the use of bail serve to notify the accused of charges and ensure their appearance at trial without being prematurely punitive.
• In felony cases within the United States, a grand jury of citizens must find probable cause before a formal indictment can be issued.

In rule-by-law countries, this right is not recognized; a person can be held indefinitely, incommunicado, without any right to seek their freedom or to demand that the government prove the charges against them.

• Grand jury hearings are one-sided proceedings where defendants have no right to appear or defend themselves.
• Jury duty is framed as a fundamental civic responsibility that individuals owe to their local communities.
• Capital crimes are defined as offenses punishable by death or automatic life imprisonment without parole.
• A person can be convicted of a capital crime even in jurisdictions that do not currently practice the death penalty.
• Global practices vary, with some nations applying the death penalty to juveniles or for non-homicide offenses.

Further, a defendant has no right to appear or defend themselves at the grand jury hearing, so it is a one-sided presentation of the evidence.

• The number of countries that have abolished the death penalty has more than doubled since 1991, with Belarus remaining the only European exception.
• In the United States, the Supreme Court briefly halted executions in 1972 due to 'cruel and unusual' procedural concerns before upholding revised statutes in 1976.
• Currently, 23 U.S. states and the District of Columbia have abolished the death penalty, while others maintain moratoriums on its use.
• The 'law of the parties' allows some states to sentence accomplices to death even if they did not commit the actual killing, a practice facing legislative review.
• U.S. law prohibits the execution of individuals who are mentally disabled or under the age of 18 at the time of their crime.

In a few states, if someone is killed during the commission of a felony, anyone involved in committing that felony can be sentenced to the death penalty, even if they are not the one who committed the killing.

• New death sentences in the United States plummeted by over 80 percent between 1988 and 2018.
• Federal executions saw a significant resurgence under the Trump administration, which carried out 13 executions following a 17-year hiatus.
• State-level application varies wildly, with Texas accounting for 37 percent of all U.S. executions since 1977 while California maintains a moratorium.
• The legal definition of 'cruel and unusual' punishment is fluid, relying on society's 'evolving standard of decency' rather than a fixed rule.
• Opponents highlight systemic flaws including the risk of executing innocent people and the inherent hypocrisy of state-sanctioned killing.
• Statistical evidence suggests deep racial bias, particularly regarding the race of the victim, which significantly influences the likelihood of a death sentence.

The US Supreme Court has held that the meaning of 'cruel and unusual' rests on society’s 'evolving standard of decency,' and thus there is no set standard.

• Civil law encompasses all non-criminal matters, including family law, personal injury, and business disputes.
• Unlike criminal cases initiated by the state, civil cases are filed by individuals or groups seeking damages or specific legal outcomes.
• The burden of proof in civil law is lower than the criminal standard, ranging from a preponderance of evidence to clear and convincing evidence.
• Procedural differences exist between the two systems regarding jury fees, the necessity of unanimous verdicts, and the right to appeal.
• Due process is a fundamental legal requirement rooted in historical documents like the Magna Carta to ensure government fairness against the accused.

Civil law differs from criminal law in that individuals or groups file cases rather than the state.

• The Fifth and 14th Amendments provide identical due process protections against federal and state governments respectively.
• The constitutional guarantee ensures that no person is deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
• These legal protections apply to all persons within the jurisdiction, not exclusively to United States citizens.
• Due process is a fundamental component of all rule-of-law systems globally.
• The concept is divided into two distinct categories: procedural due process and substantive due process.
• Procedural due process specifically dictates the formal steps the government must follow before taking action against an individual.

The clauses provide that “no person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law” and “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law,” respectively.

• Procedural due process requires notice, an opportunity to be heard, and an impartial tribunal to protect life, liberty, and property.
• Substantive due process evaluates whether government activities treat individuals fairly and equally without infringing on constitutional rights.
• Judicial independence is a critical component of impartiality, yet it is compromised in nations where the judiciary is controlled by political or religious leaders.
• In the United States, federal judges are appointed for life to ensure neutrality, though political leanings of the nominating president often influence the bench.
• Global concerns persist regarding whether legal systems treat all people equally, particularly concerning the treatment of racial minorities within criminal justice.

As the image of Lady Justice that opens this chapter shows, the scales of justice need to be in balance, and justice must be blind so that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.

• Rule-of-law countries typically employ a three-tier hierarchical court system consisting of trial courts, intermediate appeals, and a supreme court.
• In the United States federal system, 94 district courts are organized into 12 regional circuits, each with its own court of appeals.
• Trial courts serve as the level of original jurisdiction where cases are first heard and specific legal questions are detailed in written pleadings.
• The pretrial discovery phase is a critical investigative stage where parties must gather evidence that adheres to strict rules of admissibility.
• Matters not explicitly mentioned in the initial written pleadings are generally barred from being introduced later during the case proceedings.

Matters that are not mentioned in the ple adings cannot b e brought up during the case.

• The voir dire process filters potential jurors to eliminate those with prior knowledge or inherent biases.
• Opening and closing statements serve as narrative synopses for the jury but are legally excluded from the evidence used to reach a verdict.
• The evidence phase is governed by strict rules to ensure only relevant, accurate, and truthful information is presented.
• Adversarial questioning through direct and cross-examination allows attorneys to support their own views or discredit opposing witnesses.
• The jury's verdict is restricted to answering specific questions, which then becomes a formal judgment used for legal enforcement.

The opposing attorney can then cross-examine the witness in an attempt to elicit information supporting their perspective or to discredit the witness’s testimony so that the jury may question whether it is reliable.

• The adversarial system relies on the prosecution and defense to reveal the truth while the judge ensures proper legal procedure.
• The U.S. Constitution prohibits double jeopardy, meaning a defendant cannot be tried twice for the same offense in the same jurisdiction after an acquittal.
• Double jeopardy does not prevent separate jurisdictions, such as state and federal governments, from trying a person for the same act.
• Appellate courts do not conduct new trials; they review the written record of lower courts specifically to identify substantive legal errors.
• Appeals involve no witnesses or juries, focusing instead on legal precedent and the application of law by a panel of judges.
• If an error is found, an appellate court can either remand the case for a new trial or, in rare cases, render a final judgment themselves.

An appeal is not a do-over of the original trial.

• The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) acts as the final arbiter for cases from lower federal and state courts involving constitutional issues.
• Unlike lower courts, SCOTUS operates on a discretionary basis through the writ of certiorari, selecting fewer than 100 cases from thousands of annual filings.
• The Court focuses on cases with national significance, often addressing the most pressing political and social issues of the era.
• Decisions made by the highest court establish legal precedent and represent the finality of the judicial review process.
• Global legal systems vary primarily on whether they prioritize judicial review or adhere to the principle of parliamentary sovereignty.

Thousands of cases from around the country are filed with the court each year, of which they hear and decide less than 100.

• Judicial review serves as a mechanism to ensure government branches adhere to a country's constitution and core principles.
• While the United States empowers courts to perform this review, France utilizes a Constitutional Council to vet laws before they are enacted.
• Despite the power of judicial review in the US, courts maintain a strong presumption of constitutionality and rarely strike down federal or state laws.
• In systems of parliamentary sovereignty, such as the United Kingdom, the legislative body is supreme and its acts cannot be overridden by the judiciary.
• The historical shift in the UK from monarchical power to parliamentary preeminence means Parliament can create or repeal any law without constitutional binding.
• Judicial review acts as a check on government power that is fundamentally unavailable in executive or legislative sovereignty systems.

As of 2014, out of the millions of actions Congress and the president have taken in the history of the United States, SCOTUS had only ever held 176 acts of Congress to be unconstitutional.

• The UK Supreme Court's 2019 ruling against Boris Johnson highlights the tension between executive actions and parliamentary oversight.
• British parliamentary sovereignty means that acts of Parliament cannot be challenged as unconstitutional by courts, though international treaties can temporarily limit this power.
• Brexit serves as a primary example of Parliament's ability to repeal international agreements and reassert its supreme authority.
• Rule-of-law systems prioritize political neutrality and fairness, whereas rule-by-law systems use courts to reinforce authoritarian power.
• The judiciary lacks independent enforcement power and must rely on the executive branch and public respect to implement its decisions.
• While courts do not proactively create policy, their interpretations of specific cases can nudge social and political policies in new directions.

Any check on the British Parliament rests in the public perception of and support for the government.

• Common law systems, derived from British rule, rely on both legislative statutes and judicial precedents to shape the law.
• Civil law systems prioritize comprehensive written codes over judicial decisions, which are binding only to the specific parties involved rather than setting future precedent.
• Religious and customary systems base their legal authority on sacred texts or unwritten community traditions, often managed by group leaders rather than formal government entities.
• Hybrid systems integrate multiple legal traditions, such as the use of tribal customary laws alongside federal statutes in specific jurisdictions.
• The law is fundamentally divided into criminal law, which addresses offenses against the state, and civil law, which handles disputes and compensation between individuals.
• Criminal punishment serves five primary societal functions: incapacitation, retribution, deterrence, restitution, and rehabilitation.

As a result, customary laws are typically unwritten and revealed only to group members.

• Legal systems distinguish between serious offenses and misdemeanors, with punishments ranging from fines to life imprisonment or the death penalty.
• Rule-of-law countries place the burden of proof on the government, requiring guilt to be established beyond a reasonable doubt.
• Due process mandates that governments respect the rights of the accused through procedural steps and substantive protections of constitutional rights.
• The standard court hierarchy in rule-of-law nations typically involves a three-tier system starting with trial courts of original jurisdiction.
• Judicial review serves as a critical check on government power, ensuring that legislative and executive actions adhere to the constitution.
• Civil law encompasses non-criminal disputes including family matters, personal injury, and business disagreements initiated by individuals or groups.

In rule-of-law countries, a person held in jail has a right to demand to be brought into court and told why they are being jailed.

• The text defines various legal systems, including common law, civil law, and customary law, highlighting their different approaches to precedent and investigation.
• It distinguishes between rule-of-law systems and authoritarian-populist judiciaries where legal structures are manipulated by a single ruling entity.
• Key procedural terms such as arraignment, due process, and grand jury are outlined to explain the protections and steps within a criminal case.
• The concept of judicial independence is emphasized as the necessity for courts to operate without fear of reprisal or undue influence from other government branches.
• Judicial review is identified as the critical process by which the judiciary ensures that executive and legislative actions adhere to a nation's constitution.

authoritarian-populist judiciary a system that has transitioned from a rule-of-law system to a rule-by-law authoritarian subsystem through changes instituted by one ruling person or political party

• The text defines fundamental legal concepts including jurisdiction, precedent, and the distinction between procedural and substantive due process.
• It contrasts the 'rule of law,' where government is bound by legal standards, with 'rule by law,' where the judiciary acts as a tool for government control.
• The concept of standing is established as the requirement for an individual to demonstrate direct injury before challenging a law in court.
• The social contract is described as a mutual agreement where citizens follow rules in exchange for a government that limits its own power.
• Review questions emphasize that the judicial branch serves both to interpret the law in the government's name and to resolve disputes between individuals.

rule by law describes political systems in which the judicial branch and the judiciary help impose the government’s approved viewpoint on the citizens; the judiciary has little independence and acts as a source of government control over individual citizens

• The text outlines various global legal systems including common law, civil law, religious law, customary law, and hybrid models.
• It defines judicial review as the power of the courts to evaluate whether the executive and legislative branches are adhering to constitutional principles.
• The distinction between civil and criminal law is highlighted, noting that criminal law protects society while civil law settles private disputes and damages.
• Due process is identified as the government's obligation to respect the rights of the accused and ensure procedural fairness.
• Key legal mechanisms such as the writ of habeas corpus and the role of appellate jurisdiction in reviewing lower court errors are explained.

Due process means that the government must respect the rights of the accused and procedural processes must be fair.

• The 1960 presidential debate between Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy marked a turning point in how media shapes political perception.
• Visual presentation became a critical factor in politics, as television viewers favored Kennedy while radio listeners believed Nixon won.
• The media functions as a political institution that influences public understanding of government, candidates, and policy.
• A free press serves a vital 'watchdog' role in both domestic and international political systems.
• Modern political science examines how information is mediated through various platforms and the declining global trust in these sources.

Did Senator Kennedy’s good looks and confidence “win” the televised debate over a pale, overtired Nixon?

• The First Amendment explicitly protects the press, a unique constitutional status rooted in the 1720s 'Cato’s Letters' which criticized British monarchical corruption.
• The media is often referred to as the 'fourth estate,' a term credited to Thomas Carlyle that positions the press as an unofficial fourth branch of government.
• A primary function of the free press is to serve as a 'watchdog,' keeping the public informed about government wrongdoings and maintaining political norms.
• Historical examples like the Pentagon Papers demonstrate the media's ability to withstand government pressure to reveal truths about military involvement in Vietnam.
• The Watergate scandal remains the most famous instance of press freedom, where investigative reporting led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon.

Burke said there were Three Estates in Parliament; but, in the Reporter’s Gallery yonder, there sat a Fourth Estate more important far than they all.

• The Watergate scandal began with a hotel break-in and culminated in the resignation of President Richard Nixon.
• Investigative journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein were instrumental in exposing the scandal while working for the Washington Post.
• The Supreme Court's ruling on the Pentagon Papers established that national security claims cannot easily override First Amendment rights.
• Watergate demonstrated the media's vital role as a political institution capable of revealing government misconduct.
• The press is uniquely positioned to inform the public in a way that compels government accountability.
• The scandal resulted in nearly 50 criminal convictions, highlighting the legal consequences of the investigative findings.

The press was potentially Mr. Nixon’s enemy—far more than the courts or Congress, because only the press could dig out and tell the story in a way that would arouse the people to demand an accounting.

• Small independent newspapers can be just as effective as major media outlets in exposing high-level government corruption and abuse.
• The historical 'muckraker' tradition, exemplified by Upton Sinclair, demonstrates how investigative journalism can trigger significant legislative reform.
• Journalistic watchdogs serve as a vital check on power, ensuring that the public has a factual basis to criticize and hold officials accountable.
• The concept of yellow journalism highlights the ongoing tension between sensationalist, profit-driven content and rigorous civic reporting.
• Global press freedom is not uniform, as measured by indices that evaluate media pluralism, independence, and the safety of journalists.

If nothing is true, then no one can criticize power, because there is no basis upon which to do so.

• Reporters Without Borders indicates that nearly half of the world's countries face serious or difficult situations regarding press freedom.
• The United States ranks 44th globally, trailing behind nations like South Africa and South Korea due to media ownership concentration and state secrecy.
• Legislation like the Patriot Act and political rhetoric have increased pressure on journalistic sources and led to the prosecution of those uncovering state information.
• While Nordic countries like Norway lead in press freedom by actively discouraging media monopolies, the U.S. faces declining revenues and fewer working journalists.
• Research confirms that a free press serves as a vital watchdog against corruption, though its direct link to economic development remains inconclusive.
• Despite supportive rhetoric from the Biden administration, systemic issues regarding surveillance and media consolidation continue to threaten American journalism.

The 2021 index ranked the United States 44th, after South Africa (32nd), Botswana (38th), and South Korea (42nd).

• Most citizens experience politics through mediated information, meaning their understanding is shaped entirely by media storytellers rather than direct experience.
• News content is a manufactured view of reality influenced by institutional routines and underlying cultural values regarding how society ought to be.
• Core values like ethnocentrism and altruistic democracy lead the media to prioritize American interests and promote an idealized version of public service.
• Journalistic standards for 'good' stories—such as negativity, proximity, and novelty—create a homogeneous news environment often called pack journalism.
• These shared professional values and value statements act as a lens that colors the public's perception of what is right and wrong in the political sphere.

The news does not limit itself to reality judgments; it also contains values, or preference statements.

• News values vary significantly across cultures, with Western media prioritizing human interest while Arabic news emphasizes social responsibility and Islamic values.
• In authoritarian nations like China and North Korea, the media functions as a state promoter rather than a democratic watchdog.
• Agenda-setting theory suggests that media organizations shape political reality by deciding which stories to highlight and which to ignore.
• The prominence and placement of a news story signal to the audience how much importance they should attach to a specific issue.
• Gatekeeping power traditionally rests with news professionals and algorithms who filter information for the public consumption.
• Framing theory posits that the specific way media presents information directly influences how the public understands and interprets political events.

Readers learn not only about a given issue, but also how much importance to attach to that issue from the amount of information in a news story and its position.

• Journalists use framing to influence how audiences interpret political issues, much like an artist uses a frame to influence the perception of a painting.
• Gender bias persists in political framing, with female candidates often judged on personal traits while male candidates are evaluated on policy positions.
• National media frames often reflect cultural expectations, such as the Dutch media focusing on government responsibility for social welfare.
• Media content is shaped by professional values, internal pressures, and ownership structures rather than just objective reporting.
• The history of media, from the Diamond Sutra to movable type, demonstrates how faster information dissemination has historically challenged traditional authority.
• To counter media influence, individuals are encouraged to consume diverse outlets and understand the professional norms behind story selection.

Artists know that the frame placed around a painting can affect how viewers interpret and react to the painting itself.

• The invention of paper and movable type in China laid the groundwork for the mass distribution of information.
• The democratization of knowledge occurred as printed materials became accessible to the general public rather than just the elite.
• Historical power structures viewed the free spread of information as an existential threat, proving the pen is mightier than the sword.
• Modern media is categorized into four primary groups: print, radio, television, and the Internet.
• The changing media landscape has significantly altered the traditional role of media as a gatekeeper and information provider.
• Media ownership patterns continue to exert a significant influence on the global political environment.

The pope’s actions show that, as English writer and politician Edward Bulwer-Lytton wrote, “the pen is mightier than the sword.”

• Print media remains a foundational news source by setting the agenda for other platforms and providing deeper context and detail.
• Despite the rise of digital platforms, print and online media have formed a symbiotic relationship rather than a total replacement.
• Biological factors suggest that tangible print materials leave a deeper cognitive footprint in the brain than digital content.
• While print circulation has declined in some Western markets, it is thriving and prestigious in developing regions like India, South America, and Africa.
• The history of broadcasting shows that new media forms like radio, which began its golden age in the 1920s, deform and reform older media without fully erasing them.

The new will hammer the old, deform it, reform it, reconceive, reconfigure, but the old won’t disappear.

• Radio remains a dominant media platform, reaching more Americans as of 2019 than any other medium.
• While television surpassed radio for home entertainment, radio maintains a unique and persistent reach.
• The United States is the world's largest radio market, generating over half of all annual global revenue.
• The United Nations recognizes radio as a 'vector of freedom' due to its low cost and accessibility.
• Radio serves as a critical global technology for providing information to diverse populations at a low barrier to entry.

The United Nations continues to celebrate the radio on World Radio Day, hailing the humble technology as a “vector of freedom” because radio supplies low-cost information and remains a widely used technology around the globe.

• The 'network era' of television was defined by three major networks providing fixed schedules to the majority of American households.
• Cable television originated in the 1930s to serve rural areas but eventually peaked in 2010 with 90 percent of American homes paying for services.
• A rapid shift is occurring as consumers move from traditional cable to streaming services, with cable viewership dropping significantly between 2015 and 2021.
• The Internet's foundations were laid by ARPANET in the 1960s before being opened for public use and formalized via the World Wide Web in 1993.
• Global connectivity is expanding through mobile technology, with smartphone ownership reaching nearly 97 percent among American adults by 2021.

During this era, most homes had one television, and television was a means of 'bring[ing] the outside world into the home.'

• Smartphone adoption has reached near-saturation in many regions, with South Korea leading at a 95 percent adoption rate.
• The primary source of news for Americans has shifted dramatically to digital platforms, with 80 percent using smartphones and only 10 percent relying on print.
• Social media platforms, particularly Facebook, have become central news hubs for a significant portion of the American population.
• Despite the appearance of diverse choices, the U.S. and European media landscapes are characterized by extreme media concentration.
• A mere five multinational corporations control approximately 90 percent of the content consumed by American audiences.
• This market structure is defined as an oligopoly, where a small number of firms dominate the production and distribution of information.

In fact, five companies own and produce 90 percent of what Americans watch today.

• Large corporations argue that consolidation provides the financial stability necessary to invest in high-quality journalism and maintain profitability.
• Critics contend that profit-seeking motives lead companies to prioritize 'easy-to-sell' entertainment over high-value information and hard news.
• Concentrated ownership often results in content homogenization, where co-owned papers offer less diversity in scope and focus regarding foreign policy.
• Media consolidation can empower owners to amplify personal political agendas or business interests through powerful propaganda platforms.
• Research indicates that national chains often squeeze out local reporting, leading to a decline in news quality compared to smaller station groups.
• The European Union has issued warnings that similar levels of media concentration in Europe pose a significant threat to pluralism and diversity of views.

Concentration of ownership may foster entertainment variety, but it undermines diversity of information and journalistic enterprise.

• European politicians express concern that massive private media conglomerates threaten societal pluralism and exercise excessive political influence.
• Publicly funded media models, like the BBC, are associated with higher levels of social trust and lower levels of political extremism in democratic nations.
• State ownership of media in autocratic or poorer nations often serves to undermine economic rights and political freedoms.
• In the United States, public outlets like NPR and PBS have significantly lower viewership and reach compared to their private counterparts.
• The media plays a critical role in elections, where a single televised moment—such as Howard Dean's 2004 'scream'—can derail a campaign's momentum.

Countries that have strong public broadcasters such as the BBC have been shown to 'have higher levels of social trust, and the people who live in them are less likely to hold extremist political views.'

• Howard Dean delivered a high-energy speech following the Iowa caucus that culminated in a loud, shrill scream.
• National networks broadcast the clip 633 times in the following days, leading to a formal apology from CNN for over-saturation.
• The event is widely cited as the first 'viral' political moment in the digital age.
• Many political analysts believe this specific media moment effectively ended Dean's presidential campaign.
• The incident highlights the complex, often adversarial relationship between politicians and the media.

That scream and that moment, now referred to as Dean’s “I Have a Scream” speech, were played 633 times by national networks in the ensuing days.

• The media serves as the primary contact point between the American public and the world of public affairs, acting as a critical information provider during elections.
• While the media reinforces the importance of democratic participation, voters often express dissatisfaction with the lack of depth regarding substantive policy issues.
• Academic research highlights a pervasive 'horse-race' coverage style that prioritizes polling data and candidate rankings over meaningful platform analysis.
• The prolonged nature of the U.S. election cycle, including the 'invisible primary,' exacerbates the feeling of an interminable and superficial campaign season.
• Horse-race journalism is linked to increased public distrust, advantages for novelty candidates, and the marginalization of third-party voices.
• Comparative studies show that while horse-race coverage is a global phenomenon in large media markets, countries like Sweden maintain more issue-oriented reporting.

Harvard professor Thomas Patterson writes that the press is “obsessed with the horse race” of elections, and this, coupled with the unique and prolonged length of the US primaries and general election, makes the coverage seem even more endless in nature.

• The media's focus on horse-race coverage and negative framing erodes public trust in political institutions.
• Constant critical coverage can mislead voters regarding their choices and depress overall voter turnout.
• Governmental pressure in democratic nations like Japan has led to the dismissal of journalists and a decline in press freedom rankings.
• Financial manipulation, such as Mexico's massive spending on government advertising, is used to buy favorable news coverage.
• A free press is essential for generating collective action and providing the information necessary for informed political decision-making.

This incessant stream of criticism has a corrosive effect. It needlessly erodes trust in political leaders and institutions and undermines confidence in government and policy.

• A CNN political researcher describes the extensive process of tracking candidate finances, policy positions, and public statements.
• The role involves monitoring 'micro-developments' in presidential campaigns even during off-election years.
• One of the most critical tasks is preparing moderators for high-stakes presidential debates and analyzing live election night data.
• Success in political journalism stems from a lifelong passion for civic events and a deep knowledge of government structures.
• Aspiring journalists are advised to consume a wide range of information to better understand the complexities of the real world.
• The media serves as a dual-purpose tool, helping voters learn about candidates while allowing candidates to reach their audience.

Watching election night coverage was like watching the Super Bowl or the World Series.

• Political candidates utilize two primary media types: free media (press coverage) and paid media (campaign-funded advertisements).
• Abuse of government funds for media manipulation, as seen in Enrique Peña Nieto’s $2 billion expenditure in Mexico, is often illegal and can lead to electoral backlash.
• Research across 43 countries suggests that candidates using negative rhetoric, personal attacks, and fear-based appeals receive more media attention and higher success rates.
• Media narratives, such as critical coverage of immigration in the UK, have been shown to significantly influence major political outcomes like Brexit.
• The Cambridge Analytica scandal demonstrated the unethical use of scraped data to create microtargeted ads for high-profile campaigns in the US and UK.
• Modern US presidential elections involve massive financial investments in media, with hundreds of millions of dollars spent on television and social media advertising.

In a study of 97 candidates in 43 elections around the world, scholars found that candidates who employed nastier rhetoric that included personal attacks and appealed to people’s fears received wider media attention.

• International comparisons show that countries like Denmark and Germany achieve higher voter turnout despite banning or strictly limiting television political advertising.
• Negative attack ads are increasingly prevalent in the US, utilizing television's emotional intensity to amplify damaging messages more effectively than print.
• The psychological impact of negative advertising can breed contempt for the democratic process and cause voters to distrust their own political decisions.
• Scholars debate the efficacy of attack ads, with some evidence suggesting they may backfire on the attacker or only influence voters who already lack trust in government.
• Despite their controversial nature, political advertisements are protected under the First Amendment as a form of political speech distinct from commercial speech.
• Television ads remain a vital tool for American candidates because they allow for rapid reach and total control over the candidate's public image and messaging.

Because television appeals to our emotions and magnifies and intensifies what it communicates, the impact of the negative message is much more powerful and damaging on television than if the same message were being communicated through print.

• Global leaders like Narendra Modi and Barack Obama utilize Instagram to reach audiences with unprecedented speed and intimacy.
• The rise of digital media has led to a significant decline in print circulation and advertising revenue as users shift toward online news sources.
• Social media's networked nature allows for the rapid sharing of information, transforming it into a tool for both entertainment and political empowerment.
• The traditional 'gatekeeping' model of journalism is weakening as users gain the ability to create and distribute their own content.
• Lowered barriers to entry mean that individuals no longer require expensive equipment or professional licenses to broadcast to a global audience.
• Despite the digital shift, traditional 'old-guard' outlets like the New York Times and CNN remain among the most trafficked sites online.

Why would politicians want to be on the same platform as dogs dressed up in tutus and one-pot cooking recipes?

• Digital-native media outlets like Yahoo and BuzzFeed now rival traditional legacy media in terms of public popularity.
• Cultural shifts show that twice as many children now aspire to be YouTube stars rather than astronauts.
• Social media platforms offer a sense of individual empowerment by removing the financial barriers to entry found in traditional media.
• The path to viral fame relies on content creation rather than the backing of major movie studios or news networks.
• Despite the democratization of content, achieving visibility is increasingly dependent on the influence of platform algorithms.

The fact that twice as many kids want to be YouTube stars as want to be astronauts is a sure sign of the power of the Internet and social networking platforms.

• Algorithms function as mathematical rule sets that personalize social media feeds by predicting user preferences through data tracking and cookies.
• The shift from synchronous media, like the record-breaking MAS*H finale, to asynchronous online content allows users to consume media outside the constraints of time and space.
• Social media platforms have become primary spheres for college students to engage in political messaging, disruption, and the presentation of the political self.
• The advent of social media has fundamentally transformed group formation, moving away from traditional institutional structures like political parties.
• Social media serves as a critical coordination tool for global political movements, leading both authoritarian and democratic governments to attempt to limit access.
• The Arab Spring serves as a primary example of how social media can organize wide-scale pro-democracy protests across entire geographic regions.

This meant that more than 105 million people watched the finale at the same time—something unimaginable to younger viewers today, who can stream almost anything, from sports to comedies to YouTube videos, on demand.

• Digital platforms like Facebook and Twitter have served as powerful tools for political mobilization, notably contributing to the resignation of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.
• In authoritarian regimes like China, social media allows dissidents to bypass information controls and build virtual networks of like-minded individuals.
• The emergence of 'echo chambers' creates environments where users are primarily exposed to opinions that reinforce their existing beliefs.
• The lack of cross-ideological discourse on social media platforms is directly linked to increased political polarization and fragmentation.
• Global studies across Canada, France, and Thailand confirm that political polarization via social media is a widespread international phenomenon.

They learn the power of collective action. They become parts of networks that extend outside their country’s borders.

• Individuals increasingly sequester themselves within politically homogeneous social media environments.
• Polarization leads to a decline in institutional trust and a heightened suspicion of opposing viewpoints.
• Media concentration allows oligopolies to create niche, partisan platforms that fuel societal division.
• Exposure to partisan information reinforces existing beliefs and discourages political compromise.
• The success of outlets like Fox News and MSNBC exemplifies the trend toward polarized media content.

Political polarization results in lower levels of trust in institutions, higher levels of suspicion of “the other side,” and the inability to work toward compromise.

• The media serves as a critical political institution by informing voters and providing transparency regarding government actions.
• The decline of traditional gatekeepers like editors and fact-checkers has led to a decentralized media landscape prone to misinformation.
• Social media platforms create 'echo chambers' where falsehoods travel faster and further than the truth due to emotional triggers and novelty.
• Research indicates that human behavior, rather than automated bots, is the primary driver behind the rapid spread of digital disinformation.
• The democratization of news production empowers marginalized voices but simultaneously creates a dangerous minefield of unverified information.
• Individual responsibility is paramount in an era where a small number of actors can generate the majority of global misinformation.

Studies of Twitter have shown that falsehoods travel further and faster than the truth, thanks in part to the emotional responses they elicit and in part to the novelty of the falsehoods themselves.

• Social media presents a paradox where its revolutionary potential for political participation simultaneously facilitates the rapid spread of state-backed disinformation.
• Media scholars are looking toward the evolution of new gatekeepers to restore a healthier information environment on digital platforms.
• Global trust in media institutions is precariously low, which threatens the media's role as a safeguard against authoritarianism.
• Research indicates that political interest and traditional news consumption correlate with higher trust, while internet news exposure correlates with lower trust.
• The decline of local journalism is framed as a direct threat to democracy, as informed citizens are harder for authoritarian regimes to control.

Every time a newspaper dies, even a bad one, the country moves a little closer to authoritarianism.

• State ownership of television correlates with higher media trust in democratic societies but lower trust in non-democratic ones.
• Global trust in journalists varies wildly by country, ranging from 12 percent in Greece to 93 percent in Uzbekistan.
• A polarization feedback loop exists where political elites and media amplify the worst aspects of opposing sides, deepening public mistrust.
• In the United States, Republicans have increasingly integrated an anti-media stance into their core political ideology.
• The rise of online echo chambers allows users to selectively filter information, which reduces overall trust in mainstream press regardless of party affiliation.
• Trust in media is considered a vital precondition for a functioning democracy and an informed citizenry.

The relationship between trust in the media and political polarization is more analogous to the well-worn question about which came first, the chicken or the egg.

• The erosion of trust in media and government creates a vicious cycle that undermines the effectiveness of public institutions and the health of democracy.
• Transparency through official corrections and public admissions of error can actually increase audience trust rather than diminish it.
• Increasing newsroom representation and ensuring journalists reflect the communities they cover are vital for rebuilding reader relationships.
• Content quality has suffered due to the prioritization of 'talking heads' and the blurring of lines between opinion, analysis, and straight reporting.
• Structural reforms, such as reducing media concentration and providing journalists with better salaries and intellectual property rights, are proposed to ensure editorial independence.
• Local journalism is particularly effective at fostering trust, leading to suggestions for merger transaction fees to fund community-based news outlets.

The erosion of trust in public institutions damages the credibility of those institutions, further undermining their effectiveness and perpetuating a vicious circle.

• Organizations like First Draft provide journalists and the public with tools and training to identify and combat online misinformation.
• The mass media acts as a 'fourth estate' or watchdog, serving as an unofficial branch of government that checks the power of others.
• A free press is essential for functioning as an information conduit between the government and citizens who cannot monitor state affairs directly.
• Journalistic values and practices dictate the news agenda, influencing which stories are prioritized and how they are framed for the public.
• The modern media landscape is categorized into four distinct groups: print, radio, television, and the Internet.

Another common way of defining the media’s role is to say that it acts as the fourth estate, or the unofficial fourth branch of government that checks the others.

• The American and European media landscape is dominated by an oligopoly of six major firms, leading to more homogeneous and entertainment-focused content.
• Election coverage frequently prioritizes 'horse-race' optics over substantive policy discussion, forcing voters to navigate narratives shaped by heavy candidate spending.
• While state-sponsored media models thrive in Britain and Japan, they remain largely unpopular and distrusted within the United States.
• Social media has lowered barriers to entry for political coordination, yet algorithms and user preferences often create polarizing echo chambers.
• The rapid spread of misinformation on digital platforms hampers their utility as reliable sources for informed democratic decision-making.
• Global trust in media is declining, which threatens the ability of citizens to access the objective information necessary for a functioning democracy.

The majority of the media in the United States and much of Europe is owned by six major firms, and this type of oligopoly can have effects on people’s political lives.

• Political polarization and falling levels of trust create a self-reinforcing cycle that damages the relationship between the public and the media.
• International organizations like the OSCE suggest addressing media concentration through tax incentives for smaller companies and official corrections to misinformation.
• The concept of 'gatekeeping' and 'agenda-setting theory' highlights the media's power to decide which topics reach the public and how they are understood.
• Modern digital environments are often defined by 'echo chambers' and 'algorithms' that rank content based on user predictions, potentially excluding opposing views.
• The media is traditionally viewed as the 'fourth estate,' serving as an unofficial branch of government intended to check the power of other branches.
• Journalistic trends like 'pack journalism' and 'horse-race coverage' can lead to homogeneous content that prioritizes winners and losers over substantive policy issues.

Polarization leads to lower levels of trust, which lead to worse polarization.

• The media acts as a 'watchdog' and 'fourth estate,' serving as a critical check on government power and transparency.
• A polarization feedback loop exists where ideological extremes in media and political elites amplify mistrust and electoral division.
• Media gatekeeping and framing theories explain how news organizations determine topic visibility and influence public perception of policy.
• The rise of media oligopolies and social media algorithms has contributed to the creation of echo chambers that mirror users' existing beliefs.
• Declining trust in media is driven by perceived bias and polarization, though it may be mitigated by newsroom diversity and transparent corrections.

polarization feedback lo op the theory that rising p olariza tion among politic al elites and the media amplifies the worst of both sides

• The text introduces the concept of governing regimes as organized forms of political power with distinct institutional patterns.
• Regimes are categorized by how they address common global challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic response.
• A central tension exists between swift government mandates for public safety and the prioritization of individual freedoms.
• The study of regimes requires an understanding of the relationships between power, authority, and legitimacy.
• Recent political trends indicate a rise in illiberal representative regimes across different global regions.

During the global COVID-19 pandemic, for example, some countries swiftly enacted lockdowns, mask mandates, and other policies aimed at reigning in the spread of the virus, while other countries took more of a wait-and-see approach that prioritized individual freedoms.

• A government is defined as a set of organizations with the authority to exercise the widest scope of power over a specific geographic area.
• Unlike private organizations like churches, governments claim the right to impose their will on all people within their territory, regardless of affiliation.
• Governments seek to maintain peace and collective safety, as demonstrated by their unique ability to close businesses or restrict gatherings during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Following Max Weber's theory, governments strive for a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within their borders.
• While individuals may use force for self-defense, the government retains the ultimate authority to judge whether such actions are legally acceptable.

Governments often assert what Weber called a monopoly on the right to use violence, reserving for themselves either the right to use violence or the right to approve its use by others.

• Authority is defined as the legal permission granted by a governing regime to exercise power over its subjects.
• Governments typically codify this authority through constitutions that define the scope of power and the legislative process.
• The establishment of criminal law and police forces serves as a primary example of authorized power in action.
• State authority includes the right to impose behavioral prohibitions that are applicable to all individuals within a territory.
• Coercive enforcement by police must adhere to specific lines of authority and established departmental rules.
• Regulatory power, such as the control of interstate commerce, is a secondary form of authorized governmental influence.

Individuals engaging in those behaviors are subject to coercive enforcement by the state’s police force, which adheres to defined lines of authority and the rules police departments must follow.

• The federal government regulates interstate commerce, such as airline safety, through agencies like the FAA backed by coercive power.
• Max Weber argued that regimes benefit from clearly defined constitutional laws to reduce public fear and secure popular support.
• Predictable governmental actions and stable bureaucratic institutions encourage economic investment and private sector participation.
• Efficient structures of authority allow governments to amass resources more cost-effectively to serve their specific objectives.
• Taxation serves as a necessary corollary to law enforcement, providing the revenue required to maintain public order and fund social programs.
• The power to tax is a regulatory tool used to shape societal behavior through the threat of punishment for non-compliance.

When lines of authority in the government are clear, especially in the context of the state’s criminal law, the people living in a regime are less fearful of the state.

• The federal tax code uses deductions for charitable donations to incentivize individual philanthropy.
• Mortgage interest deductions are designed to encourage homeownership over renting to foster community ties.
• Homeownership is promoted as a vehicle for long-term savings and financial security during retirement.
• Governments implement 'sin taxes' on products like alcohol and cigarettes to discourage unhealthy behaviors.
• Proposed taxes on bullets and sugary drinks aim to address public health and safety concerns through financial pressure.
• Beyond fiscal policy, government leaders utilize their office and public assets to shape and influence public opinion.

In the United States, at least, the federal government has encouraged homeownership due to a belief that homeownership helps people build closer ties with and involvement in local communities and thus increases civic participation.

• Governments utilize official resources, such as Air Force One and congressional franking privileges, to promote policy agendas and influence public opinion.
• The 'bully pulpit' is a strategic tool used by executives to shape the national narrative and exert pressure on other branches of government.
• Leaders often employ rhetoric that appeals to a shared national identity or ethos to justify specific policy decisions.
• President Obama's defense of the DACA program serves as a case study in using historical narratives of immigration to build support for administrative changes.
• By defining what it means to be a citizen, officials attempt to exercise power by shaping the population's collective sense of self and history.

In the United States, presidents such as Teddy Roosevelt became famous for skillfully using the “bully pulpit,” that is, the power of the president to shape the opinions of the population.

• Governments seek legitimacy to ensure their exercise of power is viewed as rightful rather than just forceful.
• Legitimacy can be defined as a broad government trait based on widespread public belief in its right to rule.
• Individual or group judgments determine legitimacy based on whether actions align with morality, justice, and social welfare.
• Broad legitimacy does not require unanimity but rather a general sentiment of acceptance among the majority.
• A government can remain broadly legitimate even if small dissenting groups view it as illegitimate.

In either sense, legitimacy is measured in perceptions of the rightfulness of government actions—the sense that those actions are morally appropriate and consistent with basic justice and social welfare.

• Legitimacy is a complex concept based on whether citizens perceive a government's actions as rightful, moral, and just.
• While broad legitimacy is difficult to measure precisely, broad illegitimacy is often signaled by sustained protests, low trust, and calls for constitutional reform.
• Max Weber argued that legitimate governments are more efficient because they can rely on voluntary compliance rather than costly police or military force.
• In stable systems, citizens often distinguish between 'unpopular' laws they dislike and 'illegitimate' laws they believe the government has no right to enact.
• Modern political discourse in the United States shows a shift toward framing policy and election disagreements as fundamental crises of legitimacy.
• Claims of illegitimacy often focus on procedural authorization, such as allegations regarding the 2020 election, rather than just the substance of the outcomes.

Though you cannot always say for certain that a government truly has broad legitimacy, broad illegitimacy is often easy to detect.

• Public skepticism regarding the 2020 election highlights a growing divide in how citizens interpret the Constitution and the rules of governance.
• Disagreements over government actions often mask deeper conflicts between what is legally authorized and what citizens perceive as morally rightful.
• Some political actors may frame their opposition as a constitutional critique to avoid being labeled as lawless or revolutionary.
• Constitutional regimes often include provisions for states of emergency, which allow governments to bypass ordinary legal limits on their power.
• While emergency powers address public safety threats like terrorism, they can undermine the clear lines of authority that typically foster public trust.

Those making such claims may not wish to be seen as protesting authorized governmental activity since to do so could make them appear lawless or even revolutionary.

• Governments often use states of emergency to suspend civil liberties in the name of maintaining public security and state legitimacy.
• To prevent the abuse of power, some democratic regimes like France implement strict legislative time limits on emergency declarations.
• In contrast, some nations like Israel maintain indefinitely renewable emergency regulations that grant sweeping powers over judicial and civil life.
• Broad public support for emergency powers often stems from a collective belief that the state faces existential or ongoing security threats.
• The prolonged or excessive use of emergency decrees can eventually backfire, risking the erosion of the very legitimacy the regime seeks to protect.

This regulation has been renewed every year since 1948; today it applies mostly to the West Bank.

• President Ferdinand Marcos declared martial law in 1972, asserting direct control over the entire Philippine government and its agencies.
• Marcos utilized legal loopholes and constitutional mechanisms to maintain power, earning him the title of a 'constitutional dictator.'
• He orchestrated a constitutional convention to transition the presidency into a prime minister role, effectively bypassing term limits.
• Despite his authoritarian shift, Marcos initially enjoyed significant public popularity and sought to align his actions with the letter of the law.
• Public support eventually collapsed due to the cruelty of the regime, culminating in the 1986 People Power Revolution that ended his rule.

Marcos has thus been called a 'constitutional dictator,' one who came to rule with unrestrained power through a popular constitution and as a leader who himself enjoyed wide popularity.

• Regimes with sweeping, vaguely defined authority, like the Marcos-era Philippines, risk becoming police states that ignore the rule of law.
• Governments sometimes exercise unauthorized power that is nonetheless viewed as legitimate by the public.
• Minor unauthorized actions, such as the non-enforcement of underage drinking laws in the presence of parents, are often socially accepted despite technical illegality.
• In times of grave crisis or terrorist threats, populations may support the government's right to take unauthorized actions that violate the constitutional order.
• Political scientist Kim Lane Scheppele observes a trend of 'progressive normalization' where emergency violations of law eventually become standard practice.

A regime that assumes long-lasting, sweeping, and only vaguely defined authority as the Philippines did under Marcos can become a police state (sometimes called a security state)—that is, a state that uses its police or military force to exercise unrestrained power.

• Regimes with established authority can lose broad legitimacy over time, leading to peaceful or violent revolutionary change.
• Revolutions typically aim to replace an existing constitution with a new one based on transcendent standards of justice.
• Historically, Western political movements have used natural law and natural rights as the moral benchmarks for replacing illegitimate regimes.
• Modern revolutionary efforts are often complicated by disagreements over the specific meaning of fundamental human rights.
• Civil disobedience serves as a nonviolent tool to undermine the legitimacy of governing systems, as seen in the movements of Gandhi and King.
• Successful regime change is hindered by the fact that citizens may agree a government is unworthy but disagree on the reasons why.

Is there a standard of justice that transcends the constitutional law of a particular regime, a standard that can guide a people as they seek to free themselves from one constitution and replace it with another?

• Max Weber identified three primary sources of government legitimacy: traditional, charismatic, and rational-legal.
• Traditional legitimacy relies on established cultural myths and folkways, exemplified by the monarchical confederation of the United Arab Emirates.
• Charismatic legitimacy stems from the personal magnetism of a leader, such as Ruhollah Khomeini, whose perceived holiness helped topple the Iranian monarchy.
• Rational-legal legitimacy is built on the efficiency, clarity, and even-handedness of a state bureaucracy and its legal systems.
• Regimes maintain support through a combination of rational material interests, moral alignment, emotional connection, or habitual respect.

Seen by many Iranians as a stern man of God, he was widely thought to be unaffected by the wealth, power, and corruption that so many Iranians saw as typifying the regime of the shah.

• Political legitimacy is often viewed as a product of the people's agency, whether through rational reflection, emotional ties, or tradition.
• Regimes frequently shape public perception through state-controlled education, media, and the co-opting of cultural or religious values.
• The concept of 'manufactured consent' describes how states use propaganda and subtle indoctrination to instill support rather than relying on free choice.
• Belarus under Alexander Lukashenko serves as a modern case study where constitutional promises of freedom are undermined by heavy media restriction.
• By controlling information and promoting state-sponsored nationalism, regimes like Belarus, the Soviet Union, and China maintain power by limiting opposition voices.
• While some manufactured consent is overt and blatant, it can also operate through subtle systemic controls that are equally effective.

As such, although some regimes may well enjoy broad legitimacy by the free choice of their citizenry, the possibility also exists that regimes gain legitimacy through what economist Edward Herman and philosopher and linguist Noam Chomsky call (in a different context) 'manufactured consent'—that is, the shaping of the people’s response to the regime by state programs and activities designed to instill support for the regime.

• A fragile state is defined by its deteriorating ability to provide law, order, and social stability while still asserting authority.
• State fragility often stems from an erosion of legitimacy or the depletion of capacity caused by external forces like invading armies.
• A state is considered failed when it completely loses the capacity for order or when a shadow government effectively displaces official rule.
• Shadow governments can mobilize power to enact violent regime change, sometimes gaining legitimacy or simply relying on military force.
• The Taliban's resurgence in Afghanistan serves as a primary example of a shadow government providing services and collecting taxes to displace a regime.

You young people, full of vigor and vitality, are in the bloom of life, like the sun at eight or nine in the morning.

• The 2021 collapse of the democratic regime in Kabul illustrates the sudden transition to Taliban rule and the ongoing struggle for domestic legitimacy.
• Fragile states are defined by a tenuous ability to maintain peace, provide basic health services, or administer legal and educational systems.
• Somalia serves as a long-term example of state fragility, having faced over 30 years of civil war and persistent threats of famine.
• Instability in fragile regions often leads to the indefinite postponement of democratic processes, such as Somalia's first scheduled national elections in decades.
• International intervention in fragile states, like the US deployment to Somalia in the 1990s, often carries high political and military risks.
• Political science categorizes regimes by how they acquire and exercise authority, ranging from representative democracies to various forms of authoritarianism.

Whether Afghanistan’s restored Taliban regime will endure remains an open question.

• Authoritarian regimes derive power from institutions like the military, religious leaders, or monarchies rather than popular consent.
• Hard authoritarianism operates without consulting the public and is frequently associated with human rights violations.
• Soft authoritarianism seeks public input and may include hybrid democratic institutions, though unaccountable elements retain ultimate veto power.
• Regimes often 'manufacture consent' through state-controlled education, propaganda, and strict regulations on criticism.
• The heavy reliance on physical force to compel obedience often leads to the development of oversized military and police networks.
• Thailand serves as a case study where the military has exerted de facto control over a constitutional monarchy through systematic vote manipulation.

In soft authoritarianism, on the other hand, regimes affirm their right to rule apart from consultation with or approval from the public, but nevertheless frequently seek the input of the people and frequently attempt to advance what the people desire.

• Morocco operates as a constitutional monarchy that exemplifies soft authoritarianism, where the King maintains significant power despite democratic structures.
• Following the Arab Spring uprisings, constitutional reforms shifted the King from head of government to head of state and granted more authority to the elected parliament.
• Despite these reforms, the King retains the power to appoint the head of government, disband parliament, veto laws, and issue legally binding decrees.
• The monarchy derives its legitimacy from religious claims, with the King serving as the 'Commander of the Faithful' and asserting direct lineage to the prophet Muhammad.
• While Morocco has a history of repression in the Western Sahara, international observers have noted recent positive steps toward strengthening human rights protections.

The king of Morocco, therefore, still retains very substantial powers that enable him to override the will of the people as reflected in legislative elections.

• The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) serves as a primary example of a hard authoritarian regime.
• The nation operates as a communist dictatorship where political power is concentrated in a single individual.
• Leadership is hereditary, passing from founder Kim Il-Sung to Kim Jong-il and currently to Kim Jong-un.
• Kim Jong-un maintains control through his dual roles as general secretary of the Workers’ Party and chair of the Central Military Commission.
• While the constitution outlines three branches of government, all effective power remains with the supreme leader and the party elite.

Kim Jong-un, who took power by the decree of his father, who had taken power by the decree of his father, the founder of the DPRK, Kim Il-Sung.

• The North Korean government maintains a facade of democracy through a legislature and judiciary that possess no actual independence from the Workers’ Party.
• State control extends over all property, the media, and the movement of citizens, with residency in Pyongyang treated as a high-status reward.
• The regime utilizes the ideology of Juche, or national self-reliance, to justify its rule and stoke resentment against Japan and the United States.
• Economic failures are blamed on foreign sanctions, while the regime points to 1950s growth as evidence of its potential success.
• A pervasive state mythology deifies the ruling Kim family, framing total subordination to the leader as an act of familial love.
• Legitimacy in the DPRK has shifted from traditional communist ideology toward a cult of personality centered on the alleged virtues of the ruling dynasty.

This subordination is not presented as degrading but as an act of familial love, since the Supreme Leader—the popular name for Kim Jung-un—is presented as a loving father and all North Koreans as his daughters and sons.

• The Iranian government functions as a theocratic fusion of hard and soft authoritarianism, where ultimate political authority is vested in a Supreme Leader.
• While Iran holds elections for a president and parliament, the Guardian Council maintains strict control by vetting all candidates and approving all legislation.
• Representative democratic governments differ from authoritarian regimes by legally obligating governmental entities to be accountable to the citizenry through periodic elections.
• Judicial review serves as a potential counter-majoritarian force in representative regimes, allowing judges to strike down laws that violate constitutional principles.
• The global prevalence of representative regimes grew significantly following World War II, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the 'third wave' of democratization.
• The core legitimizing principle of representative governance is that the right to wield power is derived solely from the people's choice of their representatives.

As such, the regime can be thought of as a sort of fusion of hard and soft authoritarianism.

• Representative regimes are primarily categorized as either unitary systems, where officials are accountable to the entire citizenry, or federal systems, which divide power between national and regional governments.
• Federalism allows for the accommodation of regional differences by letting provinces or states manage local cultural, linguistic, and economic priorities.
• Canada serves as a prime example of federalism, balancing the French-Catholic identity of Quebec with the British-influenced values and diverse economic sectors of other provinces.
• A significant advantage of federalism is the reduction of potential government abuse by distributing power across multiple levels of authority.
• Following World War II, Allied powers mandated a federal structure for West Germany to prevent the concentration of national power that had enabled the Nazi regime.

They looked to this structure of government in the hopes of ensuring that the new regime would not develop a concentration of power in the national government that could ever again emerge as a threat to international peace.

• Federalism promotes moderate policy outcomes by preventing the central government from entirely overriding provincial authority.
• The disagreement between national and provincial spheres creates a productive tension that can lead to prudent compromises.
• Unitary systems offer clear lines of authority, avoiding the 'patchwork' of regulations often found in federal regimes.
• Critics of federalism argue that split authority leads to economic and governmental inefficiencies due to a lack of clarity.
• Unitary governments may foster stronger national cohesion by allowing citizens to focus their attention on a single source of lawmaking.

Defenders of federalism see in this disagreement a productive tension that can lead to compromise and that often results in prudent policy outcomes.

• Parliamentary systems originated in medieval England as a mechanism for the monarch to quickly resolve collective needs and secure tax revenue.
• These systems are designed for efficiency, allowing a majority party to control both the legislative and executive branches simultaneously.
• In contrast to district-based systems, Israel uses a national ballot where parties receive seats proportional to their share of the total vote.
• The Israeli Knesset exemplifies a unicameral legislature where even small parties can exert significant influence through coalition building.
• When no single party holds a majority, an alliance of parties must form a coalition government to appoint a cabinet of ministers.

A majority in parliament, therefore, can enact sweeping changes.

• In June 2021, a diverse coalition in the Israeli Knesset reached a historic deal to remove Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from power.
• Parliamentary systems often force major parties to compete for the support of small parties to achieve a governing majority.
• Small parties frequently leverage their position to demand significant executive roles, gaining influence disproportionate to their actual voter base.
• Historically, both the Likud and Labour parties have relied on small factions, such as ultra-Orthodox groups, to form governments.
• The 2021 coalition marked a significant shift by including a small Arab party, granting it substantial political influence for the first time.

In this way, parties can come to exercise influence out of proportion with the strength of their support in the population as a whole.

• The United States federal government is structured around three independent branches: the congressional legislature, the presidential executive, and the judiciary.
• A system of checks and balances requires agreement between branches for lawmaking, including the power of legislative overrides and judicial review.
• The primary objectives of this structure are to secure natural rights, provide common defense, and facilitate economic prosperity as outlined in the Preamble.
• The Constitution balances the need for government speed and efficiency with the necessity of protecting personal liberties from state overreach.
• Political power is restrained through the itemization of civil liberties in Article 1 and the protection of civil rights in the Bill of Rights.
• The requirement for consensus among all three branches serves as a safeguard to reduce the possibility of governmental abuse.

The United States was founded on the belief that these tasks require a government that can act with speed when necessary but not so hastily as to permit the government to violate personal liberties.

• Mexico utilizes a federal system with a separation of powers among the president, congress, and judiciary.
• The Mexican legislature is bicameral, consisting of the Chamber of Deputies and the Chamber of Senators.
• The Chamber of Deputies uses a mixed system where 300 members are elected by districts and 200 via regional proportional representation.
• The Chamber of Senators allocates 96 seats to districts and 32 seats based on a nationwide proportional vote.
• Data analysis suggests a correlation between political regime types, ranging from closed autocracy to liberal democracy, and human rights protection scores.

The Mexican legislature blends a proportional system of representation with a system based on representatives elected in distinct districts.

• Political scientists use quantitative and qualitative data analysis to identify connections and contradictions between different types of regimes.
• The skill set used to analyze political data is highly transferable to other fields, such as market research and consumer behavior analysis.
• Mexico's federal structure includes a directly elected executive and a judicial branch with the power of judicial review.
• The Mexican Supreme Court appointment process requires a presidential nomination and a two-thirds majority vote from the Senate.
• The Mexican Constitution seeks legitimacy by guaranteeing a significantly broader range of social and economic rights than the United States Constitution.
• Specific constitutional rights in Mexico include the right to decent housing, quality nourishment, and the state-mandated right to practice sports.

The Mexican Constitution pledges itself to defend and promote a wide array of rights—far wider than the list of rights found in the United States Constitution’s Bill of Rights.

• The Mexican government derives its legitimacy from a 1917 constitution that has been amended over 200 times to address social justice and indigenous rights.
• Widespread corruption and the rise of shadow governments run by drug cartels have significantly eroded public trust in Mexican federal authority.
• In an effort to regain legitimacy and curb cartel violence, Mexico legalized recreational marijuana in 2021 as a shift away from traditional criminalization.
• Contemporary liberal ideology emphasizes a broad spectrum of freedoms, including economic, religious, and personal identity rights, beyond just democratic voting.
• Despite the global spread of representative governments, many regimes are emerging that do not fully adhere to the broader tenets of liberal ideology.
• The text introduces Hungary as a primary example of a representative regime that persists while diverging from contemporary liberal standards.

In part to the people’s concern over the power of drug cartels to corrupt governmental officials and to run shadow governments and in part to the rise of violent crime associated with the cultivation and distribution of drugs.

• Since the late 1980s, Hungary has maintained a representative parliamentary system that has recently shifted toward nationalist conservatism.
• The Fidesz party has utilized its legislative majority to enact laws that significantly curb media, religious, and individual freedoms.
• New regulations allow the state to fine media outlets for content deemed offensive to 'human dignity' or 'common morals.'
• The government has restricted religious liberty by requiring state registration and recognizing only fourteen specific religious communities.
• Legal measures have been implemented to ban same-sex marriage, gender reassignment surgery, and the portrayal of LGBTQ topics to minors.
• Critics argue that gerrymandering and constitutional structural advantages have allowed Fidesz to undermine democratic representation while maintaining popular support.

The government has created a National Media and Communications Authority that can impose heavy fines for coverage that it considers “unbalanced or offensive to human dignity or common morals.”

• India's BJP government, led by Narendra Modi, promotes a Hindu nationalist ideology that views the nation as inherently Hindu.
• Multiple Indian states have passed laws requiring state officials to investigate and approve religious conversions to ensure they are 'sincere' and 'free.'
• Human rights groups argue these conversion laws violate religious liberty by allowing the state to judge the validity of an individual's private beliefs.
• Pakistan's parliamentary system has been used to expand blasphemy laws, specifically targeting insults against Islam, the Prophet Muhammad, and the Koran.
• The Pakistani blasphemy laws are criticized for having broad definitions and low evidentiary requirements, leading to potential infringements on free speech.
• In both nations, these restrictive measures have been implemented through legitimate parliamentary processes, reflecting a trend toward illiberal representative regimes.

According to these conversion laws, to change their religion, individuals must first have their conversion investigated by state officials who must be convinced that the conversion is free and fully informed.

• A government is defined as a set of organizations with the authority to exercise power and the final say on the use of force within a territory.
• Governments strive for legitimacy, or the perception of their rule as rightful, to ensure stability and compliance.
• Max Weber identified three primary sources of legitimacy: tradition, charismatic magnetism, and rational laws.
• Political regimes may attempt to manufacture support through propaganda or by codifying power into formal statutes and constitutions.
• The preservation of personal rights and freedoms is a modern cornerstone of Western legitimacy, but not all representative systems prioritize these values.
• When a government's exercise of power is perceived as illegitimate, it becomes vulnerable to civil disobedience or revolution.

Not all representative systems will tend to advance what Western political regimes increasingly see as the cornerstone of their own political legitimacy—the preservation of a broad range of personal rights and freedoms.

• Authoritarian regimes are defined by a lack of electoral accountability and can be categorized as 'hard' or 'soft' based on their level of public consultation.
• Representative democracies vary significantly in structure, ranging from federalist systems with divided power to unitary systems with centralized authority.
• Legislative selection in democracies differs between proportional representation, where seats match the popular vote, and district-based elections.
• Regimes seek legitimacy through diverse means, including religious status, traditional authority, charismatic leadership, or the pursuit of social justice.
• A significant global trend is the rise of illiberal representative governments, where democratically elected leaders may oppose global human rights standards.
• Examples in Hungary and India demonstrate that representative systems do not always prioritize individual rights or human equality.

Representative regimes, therefore, do not always embrace the conceptions of individual rights and human equality that are increasingly central in many representative governments.

• The text defines various structures of governance, ranging from coalition governments in parliaments to federalist systems that divide power between national and regional levels.
• It distinguishes between different levels of state stability, contrasting fragile states that struggle with social order against failed states where governmental power has completely collapsed.
• The definitions explore the spectrum of authoritarianism, from 'hard' regimes that ignore public opinion to 'soft' regimes that seek public input while maintaining absolute control.
• Concepts of legitimacy are examined, including rational-legal legitimacy based on even-handedness and 'manufactured consent' created through state-led indoctrination.
• The text outlines the mechanisms of state control, such as the monopoly on the right to use violence and the unrestrained power characteristic of police or security states.

manufactured consent support for a regime that results from state programs and activities designed to indoctrinate the people and instill that support

• The text defines the Supreme Leader in Iran and North Korea as the ultimate political authority, specifically tied to Shi'a clerical status in the Iranian context.
• Theocracy is described as a system where religious leaders possess direct or authorized control over government policy.
• The 'third wave of democratization' refers to the global movement starting in the 1970s that established accountable governments in Europe, Asia, and Latin America.
• Traditional legitimacy is achieved when a regime aligns itself with cultural myths and accepted folkways.
• Unitary systems are characterized by officials who are responsive to the entire citizenry and enforce laws for the whole country.
• The review questions explore the nature of governing regimes, the use of taxing authority, and the characteristics of soft versus hard authoritarianism.

Theocracy: a system of government in which religious leaders have authorized governmental power and possess either direct control over the government or enough authorized governmental power to be able to control the government’s policies.

• The text provides review questions distinguishing between parliamentary systems, where the legislature selects the executive, and presidential systems with independent branches.
• It highlights the characteristics of illiberal representative regimes, noting that while representatives are elected, citizens often lack fundamental political freedoms.
• The religious foundations of governance are explored through the example of Pakistan, which was established specifically to uphold Islamic values.
• The concept of blasphemy is defined as insulting speech or publications regarding a religion, illustrating how representative governments can embody values that conflict with Western human rights standards.
• The transition to international relations theory is introduced through China's construction of artificial islands in the South China Sea as a demonstration of military power.
• The outline for the subsequent chapter focuses on power measurement, sovereignty, anarchy, and various worldviews including realism and liberalism.

Representative democratic governments can embody values that human rights organizations criticize.

• International relations is a subfield of political science focused on state interactions and the pursuit of global peace and balance.
• Power is defined as the ability of a state to establish rules and prompt preferred outcomes in a given situation.
• States utilize power primarily to protect their sovereignty and guard against external attacks from other countries.
• A state's influence is derived from a combination of military, political, economic, and soft power investments.
• Military power can be exerted actively through invasion or passively through deterrence to prevent adversary aggression.

Power can best be defined as the ability to establish and enforce the rules to which all other actors in a system must adhere.

• Deterrence is a strategy used by states to avoid war by discouraging potential attackers through military strength.
• North Korea serves as a modern example of a state that prioritizes military deterrence over domestic welfare.
• The North Korean government diverts a significant portion of its limited GDP to the military, sacrificing spending on food and social services.
• Propaganda within North Korea reinforces the national policy that the military is the country's first priority.
• States can also achieve security through collective pacts, such as NATO, where multiple nations agree to support one another in case of attack.
• Security agreements allow states to leverage shared resources and mutual defense rather than relying solely on individual military spending.

He does this even at the expense of much-needed domestic spending on things like food and social services.

• Economic power is divided into internal strength, such as GDP and currency value, and external leverage in international trade and organizations.
• States increase their relative power by controlling the four factors of production: primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary.
• Comparative advantage occurs when a state can produce a specific good or service more cost-effectively than its competitors.
• Strategic investment in land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship allows a country to become a preferred resource for global consumers.
• International trade is optimized when countries focus on producing goods where they hold an advantage and trade for those they lack.

Comparative advantage allows a country to strategically invest in the factors of production—land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship—within its borders in order to develop goods or services that make it a preferred resource for consumers versus other countries.

• States leverage comparative advantage in the global market to extend their international power and economic reach.
• China serves as a modern example of using manufacturing dominance and state-controlled labor to secure a systemic advantage.
• Monetary policy and trade linkages allow states to manipulate currency values and strengthen their relative economic position.
• Economic power creates a cycle where other states seek trade relationships, further cementing the dominant state's influence.
• States utilize both overt and subversive political tactics, such as election interference or supporting coups, to ensure favorable foreign leadership.
• Historical interventions, like the 1953 U.S. involvement in Iran, demonstrate how states act to safeguard their regional and resource interests.

A state can use both overt and subversive means to influence another state or a non-state actor in order to gain more power for itself.

• State recognition is a powerful tool used to welcome allies into the international system and align global norms with a state's own preferences.
• Withholding recognition allows a state to maintain strategic relationships with other members of the international community.
• The United States faces a complex diplomatic challenge in balancing its relationship with China while supporting Taiwan's democratic autonomy.
• China views any international support for Taiwanese independence as a direct threat to its own power and regional control.
• In an anarchic international system without a central governing body, states must prioritize their own strength and sovereignty above all else.
• Strategic maneuvering is essential for states to protect themselves at all costs in a competitive global environment.

The United States must tread carefully, supporting a state that is trying to move toward democracy without angering a key economic and diplomatic ally.

• Soft power relies on attraction and persuasion through friendly interactions rather than the coercive force associated with hard power.
• The principle of reciprocity serves as the foundation for diplomacy, ensuring states interact on an equal relational footing with mutual respect.
• Diplomatic rituals, such as state visits and the exchange of ambassadors, use prestige and entertainment to influence foreign policy preferences.
• Cultural exports and global commerce act as vehicles for spreading a nation's political and social values across borders.
• The international system is populated by diverse actors, primarily states, which are defined by territory, government, and a loyal population.

Allowing for state visits is one way that a state might use the guise of entertainment as a means of persuading a state to take steps that meet its preferences.

• The text emphasizes the importance of a state being recognized as an equal partner within the international community.
• International relations are defined by the interactions and formal status of these recognized sovereign entities.
• The formation of the New Transitional Government of National Unity in South Sudan serves as a primary case study.
• Multimedia resources are utilized to illustrate the complexities of governance transitions in emerging states.
• The content focuses on understanding the diverse types of actors that operate within the global political system.

Recognition as an equal partner among states

• International recognition is a foundational norm that confers legitimacy, equality, and a 'seat at the table' for states within the global system.
• While routine leadership changes rarely affect recognition, radical shifts like the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan create crises of legitimacy.
• The international community often uses the promise of formal recognition as leverage to extract behavioral concessions from new or revolutionary regimes.
• A critical distinction exists between a 'state' as an institutional infrastructure and a 'nation' as a shared cultural or ethnic identity.
• The concept of the 'nation-state' is increasingly challenged in regions like Iraq and Nigeria where colonial powers drew arbitrary borders that ignored historical identities.
• Stateless nations represent groups with a shared identity that lack a formal institutional infrastructure recognized by the international community.

The international community, for its part, can use the promise of recognition to extract concessions from the Taliban.

• Stateless nations, such as the Kurds and Basques, face severe disadvantages and violence due to their lack of formal seats in international organizations.
• Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) serve as platforms for multiple states to collaborate on common problems within established rule sets.
• Powerful states often leverage IGOs to institutionalize norms that align with their own preferences, effectively amplifying their existing hard power.
• While IGOs like the UN can provide collective security and positive pressure, they can also be used to strong-arm weaker states into unfavorable agreements.
• The International Monetary Fund (IMF) acts as a lender of last resort but is frequently criticized for imposing terms that reflect the political interests of its dominant members.
• Decisions regarding international aid and loans are often used as tools to reward allies and punish geopolitical opposition.

In short, intergovernmental institutions are a great way for powerful states to become even more powerful.

• Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) operate as nonaligned third parties that address policy gaps or humanitarian needs that states cannot or will not handle.
• Statehood is defined by sovereignty, which provides a nation the authority to govern its own institutions and enforce laws without external interference.
• While sovereignty protects a state's cultural identity and interests, it can also serve as a shield for governments to commit human rights violations against their own citizens.
• The principle of sovereignty often prevents international intervention during humanitarian crises, as such actions can be legally interpreted as acts of aggression.
• Some regimes have exploited sovereignty to divert humanitarian aid or block NGOs from documenting atrocities, as seen in conflicts like the Syrian civil war.

States have used the cover of sovereignty to prevent nongovernmental organizations from providing aid.

• The international system is inherently anarchic because it lacks a central governing authority with the power to enforce rules.
• State sovereignty is the primary obstacle to global order, as nations prioritize their own independence over collective governance.
• Intergovernmental organizations like the UN provide forums for conflict resolution but lack the capability to impose comprehensive consequences on violators.
• Tools such as foreign aid, sanctions, and treaties are used to influence state behavior, yet their success depends entirely on broad international participation.
• The absence of a global enforcement mechanism means there is no surefire way to guarantee a state will adhere to international norms or agreements.
• The Iran Nuclear Deal serves as an example of how domestic politics and the lack of formal treaty status can undermine international cooperation.

The willingness of states to make sure that their sovereignty is protected for as long as possible ensures that the system will remain anarchic.

• The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) lacked formal treaty status, making its enforcement mechanisms vulnerable to political shifts.
• President Trump's withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Deal and reinstatement of sanctions demonstrated how a single key party can weaken a multilateral agreement.
• International relations are fundamentally defined by the tension between state sovereignty and the lack of a global governing authority.
• States simultaneously seek internal control and self-interest while resisting submission to an established external international order.
• The conflict between order and anarchy serves as the primary motivator for interactions between nations regardless of their power level.

The tension created in the fight between order and anarchy that exists in all states, no matter how powerful they are, is what underscores and motivates international relations.

• The 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis brought the United States and the Soviet Union to the brink of nuclear war over the placement of warheads in Cuba.
• This geopolitical standoff was a direct response to the United States installing nuclear weapons in Turkey, on the Soviet border.
• International relations can be better understood by breaking down complex events into three distinct levels of analysis: the individual, the state, and the global system.
• The individual level focuses on the specific actions and motivations of leaders, while the state level examines the behavior of entire countries.
• The global system level analyzes how states interact with international organizations, NGOs, and multinational corporations.
• Conflict arises when the policy decisions of one state create harmful consequences or complicate the decision-making environment for another state.

For 13 days in October 1962, the world watched with bated breath as a shipment of Soviet warheads on their way to Cuba pushed the United States and the Soviet Union to the brink of nuclear war.

• The individual level of analysis examines how institutional rules and personal motivations constrain or drive a leader's decision-making process.
• Leaders prioritize policies that allow them to claim credit and maintain power, often aligning state outcomes with personal beliefs.
• The state level of analysis focuses on how nations interact through treaties, alliances, and intergovernmental organizations.
• In democracies, a feedback loop exists where voters hold leaders accountable, ensuring state actions reflect the consent of the governed.
• Autocratic legitimacy relies on 'selectors'—key groups like the military—rather than the general voting public to maintain power.
• Power at the individual level is defined as the capacity to steer policy toward outcomes that match a leader's specific preferences.

In an autocracy, the selectors are the people who support the leader while at the same time controlling the parts of the country that a leader needs to legitimize their position, such as the military or the lucrative natural resources that the state may control.

• The global level of analysis examines how cooperation and conflict between states intersect with internal environments to drive change.
• India and Pakistan maintain nuclear stockpiles as a high-level deterrent, creating a state of mutually assured destruction similar to the Cold War.
• The international community differentiates between nuclear states based on perceived rationality and the transparency of their threat guidelines.
• North Korea is sanctioned more heavily than India or Pakistan because its nuclear posture is viewed as a blatant challenge to the balance between anarchy and order.
• The global level of analysis is characterized by responsiveness rather than agency, as international organizations often lack the power for preventive action.
• The inherent anarchy of the international system makes the global level of analysis the most unpredictable of all analytical frameworks.

The countries of the world see North Korea’s actions as a blatant challenge to the international system’s fine line between anarchy and order.

• Levels of analysis serve as lenses for policymakers to evaluate the consequences of potential solutions to complex problems.
• Governments must balance the competing preferences and needs of different groups represented at each level of analysis.
• The Cuban Missile Crisis serves as a primary example of how individual, state, and international levels influence decision-making.
• At the individual level, President Kennedy had to navigate his own preferences alongside the conflicting advice of his ExComm circle.
• Military leaders within ExComm attempted to frame aggressive responses in a way that appealed to Kennedy's desire to avoid long-term escalation.

Military leaders within ExComm strove to balance their own preferences for how the United States should project strength, favoring large shows of force and more aggressive response measures, with their understanding of who the president was and how he perceived the world around him.

• President Kennedy analyzed the Cuban Missile Crisis through multiple lenses, including the institutional preferences of the Soviet government which could override Khrushchev's personal desires.
• The United States had to weigh the risks of escalation, considering both the immediate danger to citizens and the international precedents such actions would set.
• International systemic factors played a role, involving back-channel negotiations with UN Secretary General U Thant to provide space for rational decision-making.
• Political scientists utilize various frameworks, such as realism, liberalism, and critical worldviews, to interpret state responses to international actions.
• Realism is characterized by a focus on state self-preservation and is frequently depicted in popular culture through espionage and clandestine operation narratives.

International law and norms limit what actions countries are willing to allow states to take, and this is especially true when the potential of nuclear conflict threatens the safety of not only the nations involved in a standoff, but also of the entire world.

• Realism in international relations is defined by state self-interest and a 'go-it-alone' attitude focused on security.
• States act as primary actors that seek to amass power to restructure global rules to their own advantage.
• A fundamental distrust leads states to withhold information about their goals to avoid becoming vulnerable to rivals.
• Diplomacy and negotiations are often viewed by realists as unreliable methods for ensuring state preservation.
• Game theory provides a framework for calculating state actions based on risks, rewards, and the probability of various outcomes.
• Strategic decision-making is limited by the quality of intelligence regarding the true motivations of other states.

This air of distrust underlies the thinking of a realist state.

• Realism defines states as rational actors that make policy decisions based on calculated outcomes within a finite system.
• The international system is viewed as a zero-sum game where one state's gain in power or resources is inherently another's loss.
• In an anarchic global environment, states seek to establish a balance of power through different structures of polarity.
• Unipolar systems are dominated by a single hegemon that sets global rules and expands its sphere of influence to secure resources.
• Bipolar and multipolar systems involve two or more states of relatively equal power vying for influence through allied blocs.
• Despite inherent anarchy, rational states strive to create order to increase predictability and ensure their own protection.

In a zero-sum game, a state seeks to take something, whether it be power or a physical resource, away from another state; in essence, if I win, then you lose, and there can only be one winner.

• Powerful states view international anarchy as an opportunity to impose an order that aligns with their specific long-term interests.
• The transition from European colonial dominance to a bipolar world after World War II redefined global power dynamics.
• The Cold War was characterized by a 'slowly simmering conflict' where the U.S. and USSR exerted influence based on economic and political stability.
• Bipolar competition accelerated domestic advancements in space exploration, science, and technology through intense rivalry.
• Global conflict became tangible through proxy wars, where major powers funded opposing sides in regional struggles like Vietnam and Afghanistan.

The intense competition between these two major world powers for global supremacy spilled into all parts of society, from the propaganda and policies of the United States focused on weeding out suspected communists in all aspects of society and government to the race to see who could make the greatest advancements in space exploration.

• The end of the Cold War established the United States as a hegemon, creating a sense of obligation to support less stable former Soviet states.
• The security dilemma arises when a state's defensive actions are perceived as offensive provocations by others, leading to a cycle of escalation.
• International relations are often defined by a fundamental mistrust where every policy change is interpreted as a signal of intent.
• Classical realism views states as lone actors in an anarchic system, driven by self-interest and a 'go-it-alone' attitude.
• Neorealism, or structural realism, suggests that the system's structure, rather than individual leadership, dictates state behavior.
• Unlike classical realists, neorealists may utilize international institutions like NATO to achieve their strategic goals within the global hierarchy.

This is the burden of the hegemon; when you are the victor in a conflict you may be seen as the only stable, strong power, and with that status comes a sense of obligation to help less powerful, less stable states.

• Defensive realism posits that states should maintain the status quo and use transparency to avoid the destabilizing effects of conflict.
• Offensive realism argues that states are intrinsically motivated to seek supremacy and power through aggressive military or economic actions.
• Liberalism as a worldview focuses on states working within international institutions and constraints to ensure collective security.
• Unlike realism, liberalism suggests that domestic rules and institutions significantly limit and shape a state's international behavior.
• The text distinguishes between political ideology, which guides individual values, and worldviews, which define how states perceive the global environment.

States, they say, are intrinsically motivated to seek out power and will do so only by establishing a sense of supremacy over other states, particularly those with characteristics similar to their own.

• Liberal institutionalism argues that international organizations are essential for managing an otherwise anarchic global system.
• Collective security arrangements, such as NATO, allow states to form a web of allies that provides mutual support and deterrence.
• Smaller nations benefit from these alliances by trading sovereignty and base access for the protection of more formidable military powers.
• The principle that an attack on one member is an attack on all ensures that even resource-limited states can deter aggression.
• Complex interdependence offers a middle path between realism and liberalism, focusing on the intricate networks formed by diverse global actors.
• Under complex interdependence, states often view the use of force as more costly than any potential gains, favoring cooperation instead.

In joining NATO, these smaller countries agree to allow more formidable powers, such as the United States or the United Kingdom, to install military personnel and weapons in their countries and to use them as a base of military operations in exchange for the promise that the more formidable military power will provide the smaller country with protection should the need arise.

• The relationship between the United States and China serves as a modern archetype of complex interdependence.
• Economic linkages create a symbiotic bond where the US relies on Chinese manufacturing while China supports its currency with American debt.
• Interdependence does not preclude conflict, as evidenced by ongoing cyberwarfare and diplomatic boycotts over human rights.
• Shared membership in international organizations like the UN Security Council provides a platform for cooperation but does not eliminate military posturing.
• The international community depends on these interconnected powers to manage regional stability, such as monitoring North Korea.

Those linkages keep the two countries locked in a long-standing, deeply complicated relationship.

• The international system lacks a centralized enforcement mechanism, making it inherently fragile and anarchic.
• Constructivism suggests that shared conceptions and norms act as the 'glue' that maintains global order and appropriate state behavior.
• National identity and domestic laws serve as models that states use to pressure others into emulating specific social or political behaviors.
• At the systemic level, labels like 'rogue state' or 'democratic' create social pressure for countries to align with international expectations.
• Global power is not static; it is defined by which actors have the most influence to convey or change the 'new normal' of international ideas.
• A state's national identity directly dictates its strategic goals and how it perceives potential allies or adversaries.

For constructivists, these shared conceptions and resultant norms are the glue that holds the international system together.

• The long-standing preeminence of the United States in international relations is facing a significant challenge from a new Russia-China partnership.
• Despite a history of mutual condescension, Russia and China have formed a sweeping informal agreement to cooperate against Western influence.
• This new alliance specifically targets the dominance of NATO, the global power of the U.S., and the prestige of liberal democracy.
• International relations rely heavily on established norms, ranging from the use of fiat currency to adherence to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
• Norms serve as a vital framework for states to weigh potential actions and maintain predictable behavior within the global order.

The Russians for the longest time were condescending in their view of China as an uninteresting rural society. Now China looks at Russia and says, ‘What are you good for?’

• Constructivism suggests that international relations are shaped by actors who have the power to change the rules and norms of the global system.
• A state's international standing is heavily dependent on its adherence to established norms and its reputation as a reliable ally.
• Losing status within the international community can lead to economic and political isolation, hindering a state's ability to use resources efficiently.
• State policy decisions are fundamentally grounded in how a nation perceives its place and security within the larger global structure.
• Critical worldviews like Marxism and feminism challenge dominant perspectives by viewing the existing international system as fundamentally unjust.

In the 1999 science fiction film The Matrix, Neo has the ability to change the rules upon which his world is based.

• Marxism arose as a critique of how capitalist and imperial powers control the factors of production to entrench class stratification.
• Marxist states prioritize internal investment and the development of domestic production to ensure the state's citizens benefit most from their own labor.
• Dependency theory describes a global hierarchy where 'core' nations maintain stability and wealth by exploiting 'periphery' nations for raw resources.
• Core nations have a strategic incentive to keep periphery countries in states of political and social unrest to minimize the cost of resource extraction.
• The core-periphery model suggests that nations producing high-order technological goods are better positioned to protect long-term global power.
• Both Marxism and dependency theory argue that those who control production exploit workers, advocating for control to be shifted to the laborers.

To entrench this advantage, core states have an inc entiv e to keep p eripher y countries in positions o f politic al and social unrest so that the c ore countries ma y extract the needed resources with minimal costs.

• Feminist theory critiques the state as an inherently masculine institution that has historically prioritized 'hard policy' issues like conflict and security over social welfare.
• The post-WWII era marked a significant shift as women entered positions of power, bringing focus to health, safety, and the welfare of women and children.
• Leaders like Sirimavo Bandaranaike pioneered the integration of social programs alongside traditional national security concerns.
• Issues once dismissed as 'women's issues,' such as maternal mortality and education access, are now recognized as essential for the prosperity of all society.
• The field of international relations scholarship has historically lacked objectivity due to a dominant heteronormative White male perspective.
• Increasing diversity among scholars is expanding the breadth of the field, introducing critical new perspectives on refugee rights and warfare.

The feminist tradition views the state as an inherently masculine institution in that it is and has been dominated by men and the male point of view since its inception.

• States utilize military, economic, and political power to shape the international environment according to their specific preferences.
• Sovereignty allows states to chart their own paths, but the lack of a global governing authority creates a condition of anarchy.
• International organizations and NGOs serve as platforms for cooperation, though powerful states often exert disproportionate influence within them.
• Conflict is viewed as a natural outcome of multiple sovereign entities vying for limited resources and power.
• Theoretical frameworks like Realism, Liberalism, and Constructivism offer different lenses for understanding state security and collective cooperation.
• Levels of analysis—individual, state, and global—help break down the complex motivations behind international decision-making.

This intrinsic push and pull for power and supremacy is at the heart of a system in which states push back on any organization or institution that seems to undermine its sovereignty.

• International relations is a subfield of political science focused on the complex interactions and power dynamics between different states.
• Traditional perspectives in the field often reflect the viewpoints of the most powerful states that dominate the global system.
• Critical theories like feminism and Marxism challenge standard interpretations by highlighting the perspectives of underrepresented groups.
• The international system is often defined by concepts like anarchy, the balance of power, and the presence of a global hegemon.
• Economic models such as the core-periphery model and dependency theory argue that developed nations rely on less developed ones to maintain status.
• Theories like constructivism and institutionalism emphasize that shared behaviors and international organizations are the glue holding the system together.

Just as the most powerful states tend to dominate the international system, the perspectives of those in power have tended to dominate the study of international relations.

• The text defines foundational theories of international relations, including realism's focus on self-preservation and liberalism's emphasis on institutional cooperation.
• It distinguishes between different power structures, ranging from unipolar systems dominated by one state to multipolar systems with several equal powers.
• Economic and social hierarchies are addressed through concepts like periphery countries, which provide resources to more developed states, and Marxism's focus on equitable distribution.
• The 'security dilemma' is highlighted as a critical concept where a state's defensive actions are perceived as aggressive, inadvertently escalating international tensions.
• Non-state actors and soft power are identified as alternative means of influence beyond traditional military or state-led force.

security dilemma a situation in which chang es in a s tate’s policies related to its own safety and security , because the y app ear a ggres sive to other states, ma y lead those other states to take preemptive action that ratchets up tensions between two or more states

• The text defines power in international relations as a state's ability to achieve its preferred outcomes in specific situations.
• State sovereignty is identified as a fundamental characteristic that requires other nations to use diplomacy, sanctions, or military force to influence behavior.
• The international system is characterized by anarchy, defined as the absence of an overarching governing authority above individual states.
• Realist theory posits that states are the primary actors in the global system and act primarily to ensure their own security.
• The 'security dilemma' is illustrated through modern geopolitical tensions, such as the 2022 Russian military buildup on the Ukrainian border.
• Different levels of analysis—individual, state, institutional, and systemic—are used by political scientists to understand decision-making and constraints.

In the international system, anarchy exists because... there is no overarching governing authority.

• The text presents multiple-choice questions designed to test understanding of core international relations frameworks, including Liberalism and Marxism.
• Liberalism is characterized by the use of international institutions to achieve state goals and ensure security within the global system.
• The concept of complex interdependence suggests that states often find the use of force more costly than potential gains, leading them toward cooperative institutional solutions.
• Feminist theory is highlighted as a critique of traditional international relations, arguing that the field over-prioritizes 'hard policy' like conflict over social development.
• The reading list provides a comprehensive bibliography of foundational IR texts, covering world-systems theory, social constructivism, and global capitalism.

According to feminist theory, international relations has traditionally focused on “hard policy” issues, such as conflict and security, and has relegated to second-class status issues related to development and access to social programs.

• The management of shared, finite resources like global fish stocks represents a critical challenge because no single individual or state owns the oceans.
• Technological advancements have exacerbated overfishing, making the establishment of international rules essential for the survival of future food sources.
• State sovereignty often conflicts with resource management, as nations prioritize their own independent policies and national interests over collective sustainability.
• Global governance involves a collaborative network of international law, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), and non-state actors like NGOs.
• These international frameworks aim to shape state behavior by creating norms, encouraging transparent communication, and advocating for marginalized populations.
• The visibility and influence of non-state actors in international relations have significantly increased due to the ongoing era of globalization.

No individual or state “owns” the oceans and the wildlife in them. They are a shared, finite resource.

• The international system is fundamentally anarchic, lacking a central authority to enforce peace and prosperity among sovereign states.
• Global governance emerges as a set of rules and norms that allow states to accrue rights and duties, providing structure to an otherwise chaotic environment.
• States are interdependent, meaning the achievement of national security and economic success is often contingent on the actions of other global actors.
• The 'tragedy of the commons' occurs when states prioritize short-term economic survival over long-term collective goods like a clean environment.
• Collective problems, such as air pollution, are difficult to solve because individual states may profit from behaviors that exacerbate the issue for everyone.

The tragedy of the commons occurs when there is a rivalry for limited resources to which it is inherently difficult to restrict access and individual states prioritize their own short-term economic survival over broader long-term community interests.

• The scarcity of common resources is exacerbated by the anarchic nature of the international system, making it difficult to assign responsibility for global problems.
• Free riding poses a significant challenge to collective action, as states may benefit from public goods without contributing to the sacrifices required to secure them.
• Global governance involves a diverse array of actors, including states, NGOs, and multinational corporations, working to establish international laws and limits.
• International law functions as a set of rules that increases predictability and counteracts systemic anarchy by prescribing norms for state and non-state behavior.
• The foundations of international law are not centralized but are derived from treaties, agreements, and customary practices born of functional necessity or moral consensus.

The anarchic nature of the international system complicates efforts to persuade states to recognize their contribution to a common problem and to take responsibility for their actions.

• International law is governed by bodies like the International Court of Justice for state disputes and the International Criminal Court for individual war crimes.
• State sovereignty serves as the foundation of international law, where nations voluntarily accept constraints on their behavior in exchange for mutual benefits.
• Treaties often require signatory states to modify domestic policies, as seen in environmental pacts like the Paris Climate Accord or human rights conventions.
• The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides a legal framework for maritime boundaries, resource ownership, and environmental protection.
• The Geneva Conventions codify international humanitarian law, establishing protections for civilians and prisoners of war while defining war crimes.

Signatory countries that fail to take those steps may be acting within their sovereign rights, but if they signed the treaty, those domestic actions (or that domestic inaction) are now regulated by international law.

• The Geneva Conventions provide the foundation for nine core human rights treaties that define crimes against humanity and genocide.
• UN member states are obligated under international law to respect, protect, and promote the inalienable rights of their citizens.
• The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle was developed in 2001 as a response to international complacency during the Rwandan genocide.
• R2P shifts the responsibility of protection to the international community if a sovereign state is unwilling or unable to protect its own people.
• The United Nations Security Council is authorized to intervene using diplomatic or humanitarian means to protect at-risk populations under R2P.

The philosophy behind R2P is that 'state sovereignty carrie[s] with it the obligation of the State to protect its own people, and that if the State [is] unwilling or unable to do so, the responsibility shift[s] to the international community to use diplomatic, humanitarian and other means to protect them.'

• International law enforcement relies heavily on the political will and power of individual states rather than a centralized global executive branch.
• States often hesitate to intervene in human rights violations due to risks of hostile confrontation or damage to valuable diplomatic relationships.
• The principle of state sovereignty frequently prevents the international community from punishing governments for crimes committed within their own borders.
• Power imbalances dictate compliance, as powerful nations and their allies are significantly less likely to face consequences for treaty violations than weaker states.
• The plight of marginalized groups, such as the Rohingya or victims of ISIS, highlights the gap between legal agreements and the actual protection of human rights.
• Military intervention, such as Operation Desert Storm, represents a rare instance where a broad coalition uses force to uphold international law against aggression.

Because there is no executive branch in the global governance system, international laws are difficult to enforce.

• The International Court of Justice (ICJ) serves as the primary UN judicial body, focusing on interstate disputes such as boundary and resource conflicts.
• Only about one-third of UN member states, excluding the United States, have signed agreements to be legally bound by ICJ rulings.
• The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established by the Rome Statute to prosecute individuals for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
• Major global powers like Russia, China, and the United States refuse to recognize the ICC's legitimacy, fearing it may be used as a political weapon against their citizens.
• Despite a lack of formal enforcement mechanisms, international law maintains high compliance as states feel compelled to justify their actions through accepted global norms.

The United States has established a network of bilateral treaties with countries around the world promising not to prosecute any US citizen through the ICC.

• Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are formal groups of member states designed to coordinate international action despite conflicting national interests.
• The number of IGOs has increased dramatically since World War II, ranging from technical bodies like aviation agencies to broad political entities.
• The United Nations is the preeminent global IGO, comprising 193 of the world's 195 recognized sovereign states.
• The UN's scope is nearly universal, addressing issues from peace and security to migration, human rights, and international law.
• While most nations are full members, entities like the Holy See and Palestine maintain non-voting observer status within the organization.

IGOs help the international community focus on issues and coordinate actions even when individual states’ interests may push them to act in ways that are incompatible with common goals.

• The League of Nations was established after World War I to deter aggression through collective security but failed due to its inability to punish expansionist powers.
• The United States' refusal to join the League of Nations significantly weakened the organization's effectiveness and global influence.
• The United Nations was created after World War II as a stronger successor, benefiting from full U.S. commitment and more flexible voting requirements.
• Unlike the League's requirement for unanimity, the UN operates on majority and two-thirds majority votes for key security and budgetary decisions.
• The UN is founded on the principle of state sovereignty, meaning it functions as a facilitator of global governance rather than a world government with binding authority.

While some might view the outbreak of World War II less than 20 years after the conclusion of the First World War as a failure of the idea behind the League, the leaders of the WWII Allied states saw the outbreak as evidence of the need for an even stronger global organization.

• The United Nations is founded on the core goals of promoting peace, ensuring human rights, and achieving sustainable development.
• The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights serves as the foundational global document for protecting individual freedoms and human dignity.
• UN intervention is legally restricted to stopping acts of aggression or threats to peace, while member states are limited to force in self-defense.
• The organization is structured into six primary bodies, including the General Assembly, the Security Council, and the International Court of Justice.
• The General Assembly provides a unique forum where all 193 member states have equal representation regardless of their size or wealth.
• The UN's mission often conflicts with a global system of sovereign states that are primarily concerned with their own individual survival.

In service of the goal to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war,” the UN has been involved in peacekeeping activities in areas of interstate conflict since the late 1940s.

• The Security Council is the UN's primary peacemaking body, consisting of ten elected members and five permanent members (P5) with veto power.
• The P5—the US, UK, France, Russia, and China—can individually block any Council action, even if all other fourteen members are in agreement.
• Critics advocate for Security Council reform to include permanent representation from Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East.
• The Security Council has the authority to authorize military intervention, levy economic sanctions, and impose arms embargoes to manage international conflicts.
• The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) focuses on eliminating the root causes of conflict by promoting global development and raising standards of living.
• ECOSOC currently coordinates the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, a set of 17 goals aimed at ending poverty and protecting the planet.

Even if the other 14 states on the Council agree with a given action, the veto of any one of the P5 will block the action.

• The UN Secretariat, led by the Secretary-General, manages administrative duties, international diplomacy, and fundraising for the organization.
• The Trusteeship Council, originally created to oversee territories transitioning from colonial rule to independence, is currently inactive as its mission has been fulfilled.
• UN peacekeeping missions rely on three core principles: the consent of the warring parties, strict impartiality, and the non-use of force except in self-defense or mandate protection.
• Peacekeeping efforts range from unarmed ceasefire monitoring to large-scale deployments, with some missions in the Middle East and Kashmir remaining active for over 70 years.
• The UN framework includes specialized agencies like the WHO and World Bank that operate autonomously to address global health, economic development, and trade.

More than 3,000 UN peacekeepers from 120 countries have died in this service.

• The World Health Organization (WHO) coordinates international health initiatives, focusing on disease tracking, immunization campaigns, and pandemic response.
• The WHO's 'Triple Billion' goal aims to expand universal health coverage, emergency protection, and overall well-being to billions more people.
• The World Bank invests in human capital and infrastructure to alleviate extreme poverty and foster sustainable economic growth in the poorest nations.
• The World Bank's primary objective is to reduce the percentage of people living on less than $1.90 a day to no more than 3% by the year 2030.
• The World Trade Organization (WTO) establishes global trade rules and provides a forum for negotiations to prevent costly trade wars.
• The WTO seeks to ensure that international trade flows smoothly and predictably to increase the income of its member nations.

To end extreme poverty (decrease the percentage of people living on less than $1.90 a day to no more than 3% by 2030) and to promote shared prosperity.

• The World Bank provides open data and interactive visualizations to illustrate global development and the progress of Sustainable Development Goals.
• Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are fundamentally limited by state sovereignty, as member states often prioritize national interests over collective global goods.
• Cooperation on issues like collective security and poverty is frequently hindered by disagreements on definitions of aggression and a reluctance to share national wealth.
• The United Nations faces significant financial constraints, relying on a dues system where a few wealthy nations like the U.S. and China provide the bulk of the budget.
• The UN is largely an aspirational body that lacks the power to enforce General Assembly resolutions, though these documents can help justify future international laws or sanctions.

In most circumstances, states place their own desires and interests above those of the broader international community.

• Regional Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) extend the UN model to specific geographic areas to improve quality of life through economic development and security.
• These organizations reduce conflict by fostering dialogue and promoting common interests among neighboring states on issues ranging from trade to human trafficking.
• Democratic IGOs can reinforce political norms by penalizing member states that deviate from democratic practices, such as the African Union's suspension of Egypt in 2013.
• Functionalism suggests that cooperation on small, technical tasks like air traffic control can build the trust necessary for deeper integration on complex policy issues.
• The European Union serves as the primary example of functionalism, evolving from a narrow economic union into a body that manages domestic and foreign policy.
• Military alliances like NATO increase predictability in an anarchic international system by making military commitments public and deterring potential attackers.

The idea that cooperation on small, discrete policy areas such as coordinating postal services or air traffic control can create mutual trust and evolve into cooperation on larger, more complex issues is called functionalism.

• NATO was established in 1949 by twelve founding nations to deter potential Soviet aggression in Europe.
• The alliance expanded shortly after its inception to include Greece, Turkey, and West Germany by 1955.
• Article 5 of the NATO Treaty established the principle of collective defense among all member states.
• The treaty ensured that an attack against any single member would be treated as an attack against the entire group.
• Individual national security concerns were unified under the shared existential threat of communist expansion and nuclear war.

Article 5 of the NATO Treaty promised collective defense, assuring members that “an attack on one or more of them . . . shall be considered an attack against them all.”

• Following the 1991 dissolution of the Soviet Union, NATO expanded its membership to include former Eastern Bloc and Soviet states rather than disbanding.
• The organization's mission shifted from a Cold War focus on fighting communism to a broader mandate of preserving general international security.
• NATO invoked its Article 5 collective defense agreement for the first time in history following the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States.
• The United States historically dictates NATO policy more than any single member in other IGOs, though its absolute influence has weakened as the alliance has grown.
• Internal conflicts arise from varying member perceptions of security threats, particularly regarding how to respond to Russian aggression in Crimea and Ukraine.

The United States dictates NATO policy more than, say, Germany dictates what happens in the EU and more than the UK influences what happens at the United Nations.

• The Russian invasion of Ukraine prompted NATO to strengthen defenses in bordering member states to protect the prevailing world order.
• Burden sharing remains a contentious issue within NATO, with the United States contributing 69 percent of total alliance defense spending as of 2020.
• Regional organizations like ASEAN and the African Union are increasingly integrating security functions into their broader frameworks for regional cooperation.
• The United Nations actively encourages regional organizations to share the responsibility for peacekeeping and resolving localized conflicts.
• The African Union and subregional groups have taken prominent roles in addressing security challenges across the continent, despite a mixed record of success.

The United Nations increasingly shares responsibility for peace and security with regional organizations.

• The European Union is the world's most influential regional intergovernmental organization, currently consisting of 27 member states following the 2020 withdrawal of the United Kingdom.
• Originally established in 1951 to aid post-WWII economic recovery, the EU has evolved into a deep political union focused on peace, solidarity, and common security.
• Member states must adhere to strict entrance criteria, including maintaining a free-market economy, a democratic government, and aligning national legislation with EU standards.
• The EU operates through a complex bureaucratic structure including the European Council, the directly elected European Parliament, and the executive European Commission.
• The organization is bound by a Charter of Fundamental Rights that outlaws the death penalty and mandates gender equality and cultural heritage protection.

The EU has moved far closer to the union of countries than has any other IGO.

• The European Union functions as a supranational entity with legislative and judicial bodies that can commit member states to laws and sanction noncompliance.
• The EU's scope is nearly unlimited, coordinating policies across economic, defense, foreign, and labor sectors that traditionally belong to sovereign states.
• Annual priorities range from pandemic recovery and digital challenges to geopolitical relations, reflecting a mission to ensure regional peace and prosperity.
• Internal tensions are inevitable as 27 diverse nations attempt to reconcile varying economic, political, and cultural identities into a unified response.
• The rise of 'Euroskeptic' sentiment and the exit of the United Kingdom highlight growing domestic backlash against the perceived loss of national sovereignty.
• Managing the post-Brexit relationship with the UK remains a significant ongoing challenge for the stability and influence of the organization.

Domestic constituents of wealthier states, who believe they are losing their sovereign identity and subsidizing poorer and weaker states, may become convinced that EU membership is no longer in their country’s best interest.

• The European Union faces internal instability due to democratic backsliding in member states like Poland and Hungary and the rise of populist movements.
• Brexit and the growing influence of Russia and China have forced the EU to reconsider its role as a unified global power and counterweight.
• To maintain international influence, the EU must speak with a single voice or risk becoming a mere spectator in global events.
• The success of the EU model has inspired the creation of Regional Economic Organizations (REOs) worldwide, such as USMCA, MERCOSUR, and ASEAN.
• While primarily focused on trade and development, REOs often intervene in regional security and democratic enforcement, as seen in MERCOSUR's suspension of Venezuela.
• The Pacific Alliance and ASEAN demonstrate the shift toward large-scale free-trade areas that facilitate intercontinental economic cooperation.

If each member state acts individually, Europe will find itself relegated to the role of mere spectator in the arena of major world events, with neither the capacity nor the power to influence their outcome.

• Regional Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) are formed based on shared identities, such as the Arab League, or economic interests, such as OPEC.
• OPEC controls 75 to 80 percent of global oil reserves and aims to stabilize markets, though major producers like the U.S. and Russia remain outside the group.
• Realist perspectives view IGOs primarily as tools for powerful states to exert influence, while liberal internationalists see them as essential for fostering cooperation.
• IGOs use normative language like 'global citizenship' to encourage states to move beyond sovereign individualism toward collective action.
• Regional organizations are often better positioned than global bodies to monitor member states due to their proximity and direct stake in regional stability.

The use of language reinforcing desired norms can change state behavior, reducing uncertainty and enhancing cooperation.

• Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) operate independently of state control, facilitating transnational relations through citizen-led collective action.
• NGOs form a critical part of global civil society, often mobilizing around shared moral values or specific humanitarian and environmental concerns.
• While some NGOs collaborate with states, their goals frequently diverge from government interests, leading to complex or conflicted relationships.
• The scale of these organizations varies immensely, ranging from small grassroots groups to massive entities like BRAC, which employs nearly 100,000 people.
• In developing or conflict-torn regions, NGOs often step in to provide essential services like healthcare and sanitation that the local government cannot sustain.

Often NGOs are the result of a moral crusade of one or a small group of concerned citizens.

• NGO operations are massive in scale, with the 50 largest humanitarian organizations spending approximately $18 billion annually.
• Funding for these organizations is diverse, originating from member dues, government grants, development banks, and private philanthropic foundations.
• Major international bodies like the World Bank and the UN channel significant portions of their budgets—up to 40 percent in the case of the UNHCR—through NGO partners.
• A primary weakness of NGOs is their dependence on state sovereignty, as they can only operate in regions where governments permit their presence.
• Authoritarian regimes and states concerned with 'national unity' are increasingly placing restrictions on human rights and religious NGOs.
• Large-scale NGOs like Greenpeace and Doctors Without Borders maintain global footprints, employing thousands and operating across dozens of countries.

NGOs can only work where governments accept their presence.

• Critics argue that NGOs often focus on narrow, easily marketable projects to satisfy Western donors rather than addressing systemic root causes.
• NGOs face scrutiny regarding their financial transparency, specifically the ratio of overhead and fundraising costs to direct aid.
• Despite criticisms, NGOs have held consultative status with the UN since its inception, influencing policy and accessing key documents.
• NGO coalitions have been instrumental in drafting and ratifying major international treaties, such as the Paris Agreement and the Mine Ban Treaty.
• Human rights organizations like Amnesty International leverage public pressure and lobbying to hold governments accountable for political imprisonment.

NGOs may not be interested in or able to solve the root cause of a particular problem, and hence the solutions they provide may be temporary.

• Amnesty International and other NGOs have been instrumental in the adoption of core international human rights treaties, including the Torture Convention and the Arms Trade Treaty.
• NGOs contribute to global governance through information sharing, advocacy, emergency assistance, and reinforcing the legitimacy of international organizations.
• Many international treaties grant NGOs formal authority to monitor state compliance, making them essential to the enforcement of human rights law.
• Due to their presence on the front lines, NGOs often possess superior information compared to governments, allowing them to pressure states into policy changes.
• Beyond NGOs, other non-state actors like multinational corporations (MNCs) exert significant influence on international affairs due to their vast economic resources.
• The rise of non-state actors presents both opportunities and challenges for traditional state sovereignty and global governance frameworks.

As NGO expert Peter Willets noted, 'were it not for NGOs, there would be no international law of human rights and no U.N. machinery to protect them.'

• Multinational corporations (MNCs) have consolidated power, with the number of active firms decreasing while their collective wealth and influence continue to rise.
• MNCs now control half of global exports and nearly a third of the world's wealth, leading some experts to label them 'corporate nations.'
• Major tech, oil, and finance firms like Apple possess greater wealth than 90 percent of the world's countries, challenging traditional state sovereignty.
• MNCs prioritize private profit over public goods, often relocating to developing nations with weak regulations to exploit labor and resources.
• The immense wealth of these entities allows them to bypass local laws, avoid taxation, and lobby against environmental or social protections.

Apple, for example, is wealthier than 90 percent of the world’s countries.

• Multinational corporations (MNCs) significantly influence global governance by shaping international trade, investment, and cross-border infrastructure.
• MNCs promote geopolitical stability because they require secure environments for seamless operations and standardized global pricing.
• While MNCs can provide economic development and community services, they also risk indirectly funding military conflicts through their investments.
• The UN Global Compact represents an effort to encourage corporate self-regulation regarding human rights, environmental protection, and anti-corruption.
• National identity groups seek autonomy or secession to address grievances stemming from marginalization and the desire to protect distinct cultural traditions.
• Globalization has internationalized the concerns of localized minority groups, such as the Rohingya or Basques, by connecting their struggles to global platforms.

When multinational corporations invest in a country, they can be funding—either directly or indirectly—that country’s activities, including its military conflicts.

• Regional autonomy provides ethnic minorities control over local governance and culture, often serving as a peaceful alternative to conflict.
• Secessionist movements seek full independence rather than concessions, sometimes achieving statehood through nonviolent referendums or armed struggle.
• The success of independence movements reshapes global politics by creating new states, redrawing maps, and necessitating new international agreements.
• Irredentism occurs when a state seeks to 'reclaim' territory in a neighboring country based on shared ethnic ties with that region's population.
• Irredentist rhetoric is frequently used as a strategic cover for traditional territorial expansion and the pursuit of increased geopolitical power.

As these examples suggest, irredentist rhetoric can be cover for a traditional political strategy of territorial expansion to gain power and influence.

• Approximately 84 percent of the global population identifies with a religion, with the vast majority belonging to five major faiths.
• Religious non-state actors (RNAs) include individuals, churches, and NGOs that leverage transnational beliefs to influence international relations.
• The transnational nature of religion creates a sense of kinship and solidarity among adherents that transcends national borders and ethnic differences.
• Religious leaders like the Pope, the Dalai Lama, and Ayatollah Khomeini use their platforms to influence global politics, human rights, and revolutions.
• RNAs often organize into NGOs to provide aid to the marginalized, extending their reach and influence far beyond local communities.

Adherents to a given faith often feel a form of kinship or solidarity with others of that faith regardless of regional, linguistic, ethnic, or practical differences.

• Internal schisms within major religions, such as those between Sunnis and Shiites or Catholics and Protestants, often fuel long-standing global conflicts.
• Religious leaders frequently utilize external threats as a unifying force to mobilize 'communities of the faithful' across international borders.
• Some Religious Non-state Actors (RNAs) justify the use of violence by believing their cause is an absolute moral good that transcends standard legal norms.
• The classification of RNAs is often complex, as organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood may provide essential social services while simultaneously engaging in political violence.
• The distinction between legitimate actors and terrorists is frequently subjective, often depending on regional perspectives or political alignment.
• Violent non-state actors are generally condemned under international law for endangering global security and the rule of law.

Some RNAs help reinforce norms and participate in conversations about the global good, but others promote violence and challenge global governance norms.

• Transnational organized crime (TOC) syndicates operate across borders, posing a significant threat to both domestic and international security.
• These organizations thrive in weak states where central governments lack the capacity to enforce the rule of law or control their own territory.
• Economic desperation and poverty serve as primary recruitment tools, tempting individuals with the promise of wealth or the opportunity for revenge.
• TOC activities are diverse, ranging from human trafficking and cybercrime to money laundering and intellectual property theft.
• Drug trafficking remains the second largest revenue source for these groups, often involving direct affiliations with terrorist organizations.
• Countering these multifaceted threats requires a highly coordinated international response to bridge the gaps in national jurisdictions.

Criminal networks flourish in weak states—those without functioning central governments, sophisticated criminal justice agencies, communications, or traditions of rule of law.

• Poverty serves as a primary driver for international crimes such as piracy, particularly in weak states like Somalia.
• Transnational organized crime (TOC) fuels government corruption, undermining the rule of law and economic development.
• Corruption, trafficking, and terrorism form a self-reinforcing cycle that threatens global democratic expansion.
• The borderless nature of TOC requires coordinated international efforts between domestic agencies like the FBI and IGOs like the UN.
• Advancements in technology and globalization have enabled terrorist organizations to recruit and fundraise on a global scale.

Corruption, trafficking, poverty, conflicts, and terrorism all sustain and reinforce one another.

• Modern globalization allows terrorists to reach targets more easily and spread inflammatory ideas rapidly through social media.
• Terrorist motivations are diverse, stemming from various combinations of nationalism, extremist ideology, and religious fundamentalism.
• Because terrorism is a transnational threat, it is impossible for any single state to solve the problem in isolation.
• International cooperation through IGOs like the UN and INTERPOL is essential for monitoring activities and coordinating global counter-terrorism measures.
• Effective counter-terrorism requires addressing underlying systemic factors such as weak institutions, ongoing conflict, and human rights violations.
• Global governance structures, though imperfect, manage international anarchy by setting rules and providing forums for collective action.

In today’s globalizing world, terrorists can reach their targets more easily, their targets are exposed in more places, and news and ideas that inflame people to resort to terrorism spread more widely and rapidly than in the past.

• Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) operate independently of states, allowing them to address global issues and improve lives across diverse regions.
• Because they lack state affiliation, NGOs rely on charitable funding and must obtain permission from host governments to operate within their borders.
• The landscape of international relations includes a wide array of non-state actors, ranging from legitimate corporations and religious groups to illicit terrorist and criminal organizations.
• Global governance involves the coordination of both state and non-state actors to provide public goods like peace, security, and environmental protection.
• Key international institutions like the UN's General Assembly and the International Court of Justice provide the framework for state interaction and legal dispute resolution.

Corporations, religious groups, nationalist and ethnic groups, terrorists, and organized criminal groups all impact international relations.

• The text defines key international organizations like NATO and the United Nations, highlighting their roles in security and global cooperation.
• It outlines the structure of the UN, specifically the Security Council's Permanent 5 members and the administrative role of the Secretariat.
• The concept of 'responsibility to protect' (R2P) is introduced as a moral and political mandate to prevent genocide and crimes against humanity.
• Non-state actors, including religious organizations and terrorist groups, are identified as significant forces in modern international politics.
• The 'tragedy of the commons' is presented as a primary obstacle to collective goods, where short-term state interests lead to the depletion of shared resources.
• Sustainable development is defined as a balancing act between meeting current human needs and preserving the environment for future generations.

tragedy of the commons the depletion of common resources when the incentives for states to act selfishly are greater than the incentives to cooperate to achieve a collective good

• The text outlines the fundamental role of the international system's anarchic nature in driving the necessity for global governance.
• It defines international law as a collection of formal and informal rules that loosely govern the interactions between sovereign states.
• The principle of state sovereignty is identified as the foundational bedrock upon which international law rests.
• The document distinguishes between various international bodies, including Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs), the United Nations, and the International Court of Justice.
• It highlights the historical context of major institutions, such as the UN's creation post-WWII for peace and NATO's origins in protecting Europe from the Soviet Union.

International law rests on the principle of state sovereignty.

• The European Union has evolved from its original purpose to coordinate state policies across a wide variety of diverse areas.
• Regional Intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) serve as essential forums for states to address common problems despite differing policy priorities.
• Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) like the Red Cross and Amnesty International influence global governance by drawing attention to issues and delivering aid.
• Globalization has significantly increased the presence, visibility, and power of non-state actors in the international system.
• Non-state actors, including multinational corporations and armed groups, derive power from their ability to operate across borders and access significant financial resources.

Globalization has contributed to the increased presence and visibility of non-state actors.

• The text provides a curated bibliography of scholarly works covering drug wars, UN peace operations, global economic governance, and the history of NATO.
• It introduces Chapter 16, which focuses on the evolution and current state of International Political Economy (IPE).
• The chapter outline spans from the origins of IPE and the liberal economy to modern issues like poverty, inequality, and the environmental crisis.
• A central focus is placed on the COP26 summit in Glasgow as a case study for cross-sector collaboration between governments and businesses.
• The introduction highlights the role of both traditional and nontraditional media in reporting on global climate action and policy.

The main goal of the summit was to foster collaboration between governments, businesses, and civil society and to propel action to tackle the climate crisis.

• The rise of nontraditional media platforms like TikTok and Instagram has democratized news coverage, allowing individuals to highlight global issues like COP26 alongside traditional outlets.
• The COP26 summit resulted in government pledges regarding methane, coal, and deforestation aimed at limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
• Governments engage in a 'commitment vs. avoidance game' because environmental policies impose immediate economic costs for long-term benefits.
• Domestic environmental regulations can increase production costs, potentially making local firms less competitive in a globalized market and leading to unemployment.
• While regulations improve local health and environmental quality, the causal link between specific emission changes and community health is often difficult to prove scientifically.
• The proportional global benefit of a single factory's regulation often appears small when compared to the significant domestic economic trade-offs required.

Governments play the “commitment vs. avoidance game” because environmental policy, like every other kind of public policy, requires costs to achieve benefits.

• Environmental policies create a tension between widespread public benefits and localized economic costs like unemployment.
• Labor unions and business interests often label environmental protections as 'job-killing regulations' to mobilize opposition.
• Governments engage in a 'commitment vs. avoidance game' based on how regulations affect their specific voting constituents.
• International Political Economy (IPE) is defined as the study of how political processes and policies create winners and losers.
• The field of IPE has evolved since the 16th century, beginning with early theories such as mercantilism.
• IPE analyzes the redistribution of costs and benefits across both domestic and international actors.

As a result , labor unions , workers, and business parties commonly ref er to environmental regulations as “job -killing regulations” and thus tend to oppose them .

• Political factors, ranging from domestic electoral systems to international globalization pressures, dictate the creation of public policies.
• Public policies inherently redistribute wealth, creating a system of winners and losers based on how benefits and costs are shifted across groups.
• Politicians often negotiate policies, such as environmental agreements at COP26, with the primary goal of catering to constituents to remain in power.
• The field of political economy emerged from Enlightenment transformations that paved the way for modern capitalism and the market economy.
• During the era of absolutism, power and wealth were interchangeable concepts where monarchs sought to accumulate gold and silver to increase their divine authority.
• Mercantilism served as the dominant economic system of the absolutist era, focusing on the accumulation of precious metals as the primary form of capital.

Political economy has been around for as long as politicians have been making decisions that favor some groups at the expense of others.

• Mercantilism was based on the belief that global wealth was finite, making economic accumulation a zero-sum game where one nation's gain was another's loss.
• European monarchs used absolute power to sponsor naval fleets and colonize foreign lands to seize precious metals and expand their domains.
• Wealth and power existed in a symbiotic cycle: monarchs used wealth to hire mercenary armies, which in turn protected and expanded their wealth.
• Protectionist policies like tariffs and quotas were used to maintain trade surpluses, though they suppressed industrial innovation and market development.
• Economic activity during this era was largely limited to subsistence for commoners, with luxury goods reserved exclusively for the aristocracy.
• The capital accumulated during the mercantilist period eventually provided the necessary resources to trigger the Industrial Revolution.

The more wealth a monarch possessed, the more soldiers they could afford, and thus the higher their chances were of winning the war and maintaining their power.

• The Enlightenment dismantled absolute authority by replacing divine providence with anthropocentrism and rationalism.
• New intellectual frameworks like scientism established inductive natural science as the primary source of genuine knowledge.
• These philosophical shifts directly fueled political upheavals, including the French Revolution and American independence.
• The era redefined 'civilization' as a state achieved through industrialization and reason, contrasting it with traditional 'savagery.'
• Western European ideals of market development and social progress were propagated globally through colonization and migration.
• While civilized society offers unique opportunities for its members, it simultaneously introduces new, inherent dangers.

Enlightenment thinkers freed human beings from an unquestionable religiosity, superstitions, and social rigidity.

• Enlightenment thinkers revolutionized economic theory by rejecting the mercantilist view that wealth is a finite resource.
• Wealth was redefined as the market value of goods and services produced through the application of human assets and labor.
• The shift implied that because human creativity and industriousness are boundless, the potential for wealth creation is effectively infinite.
• Adam Smith's 'The Wealth of Nations' established the foundation for modern liberal economics and the free-market system.
• Smith advocated for a laissez-faire approach, arguing that government interference and trade barriers ultimately harm economic health.

If wealth is understood as the extent to which the market values a good or service, and if the creativity and industriousness of the human mind is boundless, then wealth is infinite.

• Adam Smith argued that individual self-interest naturally leads to optimal societal outcomes when governments allow freedom of production and trade.
• At the state level, Smith proposed that nations should specialize in goods where they hold a comparative advantage, such as French wine or British wool.
• International trade based on specialization allows consumers in all participating nations to access the highest quality products at the lowest possible costs.
• The accumulation of capital in preindustrial societies is credited with enabling the Industrial Revolution and improving general quality of life.
• While Smith's ideas led to the repeal of the British Corn Laws and early trade liberalization, the high costs of the Napoleonic Wars eventually forced a return to protectionism.

Thus, if governments guarantee individuals the freedom to produce and trade as they please, society will be better off in the long run.

• The Congress of Vienna established a peace framework among five major European powers to prevent conflict after the Napoleonic Wars.
• The resulting Concert of Europe maintained relative peace on the continent for nearly a century, from 1815 to 1914.
• This era of stability initially fostered trade liberalization and technological improvements across international markets.
• Rising competition and domestic pressures led Germany to abandon free trade for protectionism in the 1870s.
• Global trade fluctuated significantly between the late 19th century and the establishment of the modern financial system after World War II.

The Congress of Vienna led to the Concert of Europe, a general consensus to promote equilibrium among the five great European powers.

• Post-WWII economic dominance allowed the United States to lead the creation of a new international financial order.
• The 1944 Bretton Woods Conference brought together 44 nations, though negotiations were primarily dominated by the US and Great Britain.
• The primary goal of the new system was to prevent a repeat of the 1929 stock market crash and the subsequent Great Depression.
• The conference established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank to ensure global stability and European reconstruction.
• While a trade organization was initially delayed due to political sensitivities, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) eventually emerged in 1947.

Yet, the participation of these 44 states was only relevant to the extent that they supported either the American or the British side.

• The Bretton Woods conference established a strict international monetary system to prevent competitive devaluations, which were then believed to have caused the 1929 financial crisis.
• The system was anchored by the US dollar, which was pegged to gold at $35 per ounce, while other currencies maintained fixed parities with the dollar.
• The International Monetary Fund (IMF) was created to monitor currency values and authorize devaluations only in cases of fundamental economic imbalance.
• The Marshall Plan addressed a global liquidity shortage by injecting $26 billion in US aid into Europe and Japan for post-war recovery.
• Central banks used reserves to maintain pegged exchange rates, intervening when supply and demand threatened to shift a currency's value beyond agreed limits.

Capitalizing on the situation, the US delegation proposed a system backed by the US dollar and assured that the US government would guarantee that every dollar was backed by gold—one ounce of gold per 35 US dollars (USD).

• Governments were required to maintain currency stability within a narrow 1 percent margin through market intervention.
• The system relied on national reserves of gold or US dollars to counteract natural supply and demand fluctuations.
• In practice, surplus-holding countries rarely corrected their currency appreciation, leading to a systemic imbalance.
• Devaluation became stigmatized as a sign of economic failure rather than being utilized as a regulatory tool.
• The IMF uses a quota formula based on economic size to determine a member's voting power and financial access.

As a result, devaluations are often seen as synonymous with economic problems rather than as a mechanism for regulating the system.

• From 1949 to 1958, the United States utilized its economic superiority to fund the reconstruction of Europe and Japan as a strategic bulwark against communism.
• Deliberate devaluations of foreign currencies against the dollar initially created trade surpluses for Europe, resulting in necessary but growing US deficits.
• By 1958, the establishment of European currency conversion rates and massive American corporate investment led to an overabundance of dollars abroad.
• The surplus of dollars caused a loss of credibility, prompting nations to exchange their dollar reserves for gold and depleting US gold reserves.
• The financial strain of the Vietnam War, coupled with delayed tax adjustments, exacerbated the US debt and further destabilized the global economy.
• In response to these systemic pressures, the IMF created Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) in 1969 to serve as a new international unit of account.

As countries exchanged their dollars for gold, the demand for gold increased, and when the supply did not meet the demand, the price of gold increased.

• The IMF introduced Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) to increase global liquidity and reduce reliance on gold and the US dollar.
• SDRs were launched at a time when the global financial system was already oversaturated with US dollars.
• In August 1971, President Richard Nixon unilaterally ended the dollar's convertibility into gold and devalued the currency.
• These policy shifts effectively terminated the Bretton Woods system that had governed post-war international finance.
• A second devaluation in 1972 further reduced US debt and forced a revision of the IMF's core functions.
• The collapse of the gold-standard link marked the beginning of a new, more volatile phase in the global economy.

The SDRs emerged when the world w as already drowning in excessive liquidity o f dollars .

• The IMF introduced conditionalities in the 1970s, requiring borrowing nations to implement specific policy actions in exchange for financial support.
• Critics argue that these conditions often follow a 'one size fits all' approach that penalizes vulnerable, poor countries and infringes upon their national sovereignty.
• The Washington Consensus emerged in the 1990s as a standardized framework to promote fiscal balance, macroeconomic stability, and global trade participation.
• Beyond providing credit, the IMF acts as a signal of credibility to international financial markets, encouraging private investment to return to distressed economies.
• When economic reforms fail, it remains a point of contention whether the fault lies with the IMF's policy recommendations or the domestic government's implementation.

Regardless of how well the IMF tailors conditionalities, because borrower countries cannot opt out of them, they can be seen as a way IMF programs limit these countries’ sovereignty.

• The World Bank was initially established as a secondary priority to the IMF, focused on rebuilding war-torn Europe and assisting developing nations.
• The implementation of the Marshall Plan forced the Bank to pivot its strategy toward global development projects in infrastructure and power.
• Under Robert McNamara in the 1970s, the Bank redefined its mission to target 'absolute poverty' and basic human needs directly.
• During the 1980s debt and oil crises, the Bank introduced structural adjustment loans tied to IMF conditionalities, which drew significant international criticism.
• The post-Cold War era saw the Bank expand to assist former Soviet nations and integrate environmental sustainability into its core poverty reduction goals.

In a speech in 1973, World Bank P resident Robert McNamara first described this condition as absolute poverty.

• The World Bank shifted its focus in the late 1990s toward conflict prevention, post-conflict reconstruction, and combating institutional corruption.
• By the mid-2000s, the World Bank transitioned into a 'knowledge institution' emphasizing data transparency and informed borrowing for developing nations.
• Recent World Bank initiatives prioritize community-driven development, the protection of vulnerable groups, and climate change mitigation.
• The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) emerged in 1947 as a preliminary effort to reverse the protectionist policies of the 1930s.
• While the GATT was intended to be a precursor to an International Trade Organization (ITO), it included unique provisions for its own survival should the ITO fail to form.

Curiously, the GATT included provisions for the relationship between the GATT and the ITO, but also for the GATT’s role in the case that the ITO ended up not being established.

• The International Trade Organization (ITO) was intended to be a powerful UN agency regulating trade and labor, but it failed after the US Congress refused ratification in 1950.
• Following the ITO's collapse, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) became the primary multilateral instrument for international trade for nearly 50 years.
• Through a series of 'trade rounds,' GATT signatories successfully reduced international tariffs and eventually began addressing non-tariff barriers like quotas and embargoes.
• The scope of trade negotiations expanded over decades to include complex issues such as anti-dumping measures, intellectual property, and services.
• The GATT era saw international trade volume growth outpace production growth, signaling a shift toward globalized manufacturing and unfinished product exchange.
• The multilateral process culminated in the Uruguay Round, which led to the 1995 establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO).

In 1950, when the US government announced that it would no longer pursue congressional ratification of the ITO Charter, the ITO was dead.

• Economic recessions in the 1970s and 1980s triggered a rise in protectionism and bilateral agreements that undermined multilateralism.
• The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) faced limitations, including the exclusion of agricultural trade and services and a weak dispute settlement system.
• The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established following the Uruguay Round to address these gaps and promote trade liberalization.
• WTO agreements expanded the scope of international trade law to include goods, services, and intellectual property rights.
• The WTO's dispute settlement process serves as a central pillar for global economic stability by enforcing a rules-based system.

Dispute settlement is the central pillar of the multilateral trading system and one of WTO’s main contributions to the stability of the global economy.

• International grain commerce is essential for feeding the global population, particularly during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
• Laíssa Vasconcelos coordinates grain purchase contracts and export operations for a multinational subsidiary in Brazil.
• Modern corporate roles in trade now include advisory positions on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) committees.
• ESG indicators are becoming critical metrics for investors to evaluate a company's impact on society and the environment.
• Career advancement in international trade often stems from understanding how specific technical tasks fit into the 'bigger picture' of the organization.
• The text transitions into the Post–Cold War period and the tenets of modernization theory as a framework for global development.

Investors are increasingly relying on ESG indicators to make investment decisions.

• From the late 19th century through 1989, international political economy was dominated almost exclusively by Western liberal democracies.
• The end of the Cold War shifted the global focus from Western financial powers toward promoting development in formerly communist and Latin American nations.
• Modernization theory, pioneered by Seymour Martin Lipset, posits that increased wealth and education create the necessary conditions for democratic institutions.
• Lipset argued that as the middle class expands through education and economic access, it naturally pushes for greater political representation.
• While empirical evidence shows a high correlation between economic growth and democratization, scholars still struggle to identify the exact causal mechanism.

Even when these other countries participated in international relations, as was the case in the Bretton Woods conference, they were considered mere spectators.

• Scholars Adam Przeworski and Fernando Limongi argue that while economic growth does not cause democratic transitions, it ensures a democracy's survival once established.
• Daron Acemoglu challenges traditional modernization theory, suggesting that critical historical moments, rather than just economic growth, determine both political and economic outcomes.
• The focus of international development has shifted from pure market growth to 'sustainable development' due to the unintended consequences of global market economies.
• The post-Cold War era has expanded International Political Economy (IPE) to include issues like globalization, migration, inequality, and climate change.
• Modern IPE research has transitioned toward empirical analysis, utilizing advanced statistical techniques to measure previously unquantifiable variables.

These scholars offer a metaphor to explain this relationship, suggesting that if modernization is a long walk, democracy is only the final step.

• Globalization is defined as an economic system where core activities and capital markets function as a single unit in real time on a planetary scale.
• The interconnectedness of global markets presents a dual reality, acting as either an opportunity or a threat based on a nation's competitive capacity.
• Political science research suggests that domestic governments often expand under pressure from leftist parties to buffer workers against the volatility of open economies.
• Trade liberalization creates widespread benefits through lower prices but imposes localized costs on workers in industries that cannot compete internationally.
• Protectionism serves to safeguard specific domestic industries at the expense of the general public through increased consumer prices.
• Recent data indicates that globalization has begun to retreat for the first time since the era of World War I.

Thus capital markets are interconnected worldwide, so that savings and investment in all countries . . . depend for their performance on the evolution and behavior of global financial markets.

• Trade liberalization lowers prices and increases quality of life for millions while simultaneously causing industrial dislocation.
• Factory workers face significant hurdles because their skills are often industry-specific and do not translate easily to other sectors.
• Displaced workers frequently face a choice between low-paying service jobs, difficult retraining programs, or long-term unemployment.
• Investors and factory owners are better equipped to handle market volatility through savings and insurance compared to vulnerable workers.
• The political composition of a government determines the level of welfare support provided to those displaced by international competition.
• Globalization impacts factory owners and workers differently, leading to divergent pressures on government spending and size.

For example, a welder in a steel factory has abilities that cannot be easily translated to other industries.

• Individual attitudes toward globalization are primarily driven by material gains and educational attainment.
• Workers in import-competing industries often oppose trade liberalization because they face job losses and market displacement from cheaper, higher-quality foreign goods.
• Conversely, individuals employed in export-oriented industries generally favor free trade as it opens new markets for their products.
• While trade creates short-term winners and losers, it generally benefits a country's consumers as a whole by lowering prices and increasing product quality.
• Highly skilled or educated individuals are more likely to support market liberalization regardless of their specific industry's performance.
• Research across different nations, including the United States and Argentina, confirms that skill levels and occupational status are consistent predictors of trade policy preferences.

The sugar industry in Country A, which had adopted liberal trade policies, would face pressure from the international market to become more efficient and to produce cheaper sugar.

• Government subsidies allow domestic industries without a comparative advantage, such as US sugar, to remain competitive against cheaper foreign imports.
• While subsidies protect domestic jobs and industry sectors, they often result in higher prices for the average consumer.
• Financial crises are recurring features of the international economy, characterized by capital flight, unemployment, and economic contraction.
• The 2008 financial crisis was rooted in early 2000s tax cuts and excessive international borrowing facilitated by low interest rates.
• The United States maintained a massive balance of payments deficit that would have damaged the credit reputation of a developing nation.
• High levels of market liquidity in the mid-2000s led to a surge in consumer demand and a dramatic spike in housing prices.

A similar level of debt would certainly affect the reputation of other countries, especially developing ones, making it more difficult for them to get loans, but creditors decided to overlook the situation when it happened in the United States.

• Federal Reserve leaders initially ignored warning signs of the 2008 crisis, incorrectly assuming the U.S. was immune to the debt issues affecting other nations.
• The Obama administration utilized Keynesian interventionism, bailing out major corporations and stimulating investment to mitigate the economic slowdown.
• Unlike most nations facing financial crises, the U.S. did not have to secure its exchange rate or follow IMF-prescribed austerity measures.
• The ability of the U.S. to pursue expansionary policies while ignoring international mandates highlights its unique status as a global financial hegemon.
• The disparity between the U.S. recovery and the forced austerity in countries like Greece demonstrates how international power dictates available economic responses.

Perhaps no country other than the United States could have contradicted IMF prescriptions.

• The 1971 collapse of the Bretton Woods system ended the gold standard, transitioning global currencies to a trust-based value system.
• Modern currency value is driven by the perceived worth of a nation's goods and services, which creates demand for its specific currency.
• Exchange rates function as the relative price of one currency against another, determined by international market demand.
• Governments manipulate currency value through trade incentives, such as fostering innovation and increasing domestic productivity.
• Monetary policy tools like printing money or adjusting interest rates are used by states to control consumption and currency strength.
• States can directly influence their economic standing by establishing specific exchange rate regimes to alter relative prices.

In 1971, the gold standard was extinguished, and since then the value of national currencies has been based on trust, or their perceived value.

• Economists lack a consensus on the ideal exchange rate policy, unlike the general agreement favoring free trade.
• Floating exchange rates are determined by market supply and demand, theoretically leading to long-term equilibrium and zero balance of payments.
• Fixed exchange rate regimes require government intervention through reserves and fiscal policy to keep currency values constant regardless of market pressure.
• Governments often fix exchange rates to stimulate exports, reduce imports, and manage balance of payment deficits.
• Multilateral exchange rate regimes allow for fluctuations within a specific range, defined by a floor and a ceiling value.

In a floating exchange rate regime, the prices of currencies float naturally according to the pressures of supply and demand.

• Fixed exchange rate regimes promote trade stability and macroeconomic predictability but limit a government's ability to use monetary policy for political ends.
• Floating exchange rate regimes allow for political manipulation of currency values, which can be used to influence electoral outcomes or partisan agendas.
• Independent central banks are often utilized to insulate monetary policy from short-term political pressures and align it with long-term economic goals.
• Increased capital mobility since the 1990s has shifted domestic politics toward floating regimes, favoring mobile asset owners over less mobile sectors like farming.
• The choice of an optimal exchange rate regime remains a point of contention among economists due to the conflicting interests of different socioeconomic groups.

In the long run, this trend tends to favor the mobile capital owners over workers.

• The liberal market economy provides unprecedented opportunities for wealth creation and technological innovation through individual incentives.
• Entrepreneurs like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs exemplify how market rewards fuel solutions to complex problems and transform global lifestyles.
• Despite its successes, capitalism is inherently linked to systemic dangers including poverty, inequality, and environmental crises.
• Pre-market systems like mercantilism featured fixed wealth and widespread frugality, which resulted in less striking inequality among the general population.
• The Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution shifted society toward mass consumption and the emergence of a new middle class.
• Scholars argue that poverty is an inescapable feature of the market economy, exacerbated by the protection of property rights and laissez-faire principles.

As they were all in the same boat, everyone had similar living conditions, and there was no striking inequality.

• The transition from mercantilism to a market economy shifted the responsibility for basic needs from landlords to individual wage earners.
• Industrialization creates a structural paradox where the same mechanisms that drive innovation also generate inequality and environmental crises.
• The introduction of wages created a fundamental tension between the worker's need for subsistence and the owner's drive for low production costs.
• Poverty in the industrial era is characterized by a lack of access to land or markets, leaving the displaced unable to fulfill basic needs for food and shelter.
• Unemployment and low wages occur when the supply of non-specialized labor exceeds demand, directly resulting in systemic poverty.

The British television series Downton Abbey, set in the early 20th century, illustrates the change from a world where the landlord was responsible for caring for the families that lived on their land to a world where individuals were free and thus responsible for the care of themselves and their families.

• The Industrial Revolution's widespread poverty led 19th-century political philosophers to propose social ownership of the means of production.
• Socialist thinkers argued that market economies could not resolve wealth inequality, advocating for strong government redistribution instead.
• Karl Marx called for a proletarian revolution to end capitalist exploitation, leading to states that prioritized socialist ideals over individual property rights.
• Modern theorists like Jeffrey Sachs argue that poverty can be eradicated from within the capitalist system through technology and investment.
• Sachs and supporters like Bono believe the current generation possesses the accumulated economic progress necessary to meet basic human needs globally.
• The debate remains centered on whether extreme poverty is best solved by dismantling the market system or by leveraging its technological advancements.

We are the first generation who can . . . unknot the whole tangle of bad trade, bad debt, and bad luck.

• Jeffrey Sachs advocated for a moral commitment to end poverty within the capitalist system by reforming international institutions and promoting sustainable development.
• Trade liberalization and economic integration since the 1990s have added billions of dollars to the GDP growth of developing nations.
• The global poverty rate saw a significant decline from approximately 35 percent in 1990 to about 10 percent in 2017.
• The number of people living in extreme poverty dropped from nearly 2 billion to roughly 689 million over a twenty-seven-year period.
• Modern crises including the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, and armed conflict threaten to reverse decades of progress in poverty eradication.
• The pandemic-induced economic slowdown has negatively impacted labor force skills, educational outcomes, and global supply chains.

While COVID-19 triggered the trend reversal, its effects have been intensified by armed conflict in some countries and the growing impact of climate change worldwide.

• The contemporary global economy relies on complex international supply chains to produce mass-market goods using cheap labor and raw materials.
• Industrial production processes and global transportation systems are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change.
• The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change identifies cumulative emissions since the Industrial Revolution as the primary driver of the current environmental crisis.
• Scholars are divided on solutions, with one major school of thought advocating for 'degrowth' to mitigate environmental damage.
• Degrowth proponents argue that society must intentionally decrease economic production and consumption levels to save the planet.

In short, the environmental crisis is another unintended negative consequence of the market economy.

• Degrowth advocates suggest prioritizing ecological well-being over consumption, while sustainable development proponents believe innovation can reconcile growth with environmental quality.
• Historically, industrial production has ignored social costs, focusing only on private costs like labor and raw materials.
• Social costs include environmental damage such as deforestation, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions that are not reflected in market prices.
• The burden of environmental costs is often localized, affecting those living near production sites while benefits are distributed among a wider consumer base.
• Incorporating environmental externalities into product pricing would lead to higher costs, reduced consumption, and potential unemployment.
• International bodies like the UN and EU are implementing policies and Sustainable Development Goals to address these systemic failures.

The individuals who live near these refineries pay the highest environmental costs, while the benefits of cheap gas are spread among millions of American consumers.

• International Political Economy (IPE) has evolved from mercantilist protectionism, where wealth was seen as a finite supply of precious metals, to a liberal system focused on wealth creation.
• The Bretton Woods Conference established the foundational financial architecture of the modern world, including the IMF, the World Bank, and the eventual formation of the WTO.
• Post-Cold War modernization theory posits a strong statistical correlation between economic development and the successful transition to democratic governance.
• The focus of IPE has shifted from exclusively Western interests to addressing global challenges like poverty reduction, international migration, and the climate crisis.
• U.S. commitment to sustainable development has fluctuated significantly between administrations, reflecting the political nature of international economic policy.

During the absolutist era, the amount of wealth in the world was considered finite—determined by a fixed supply of precious metals—and powerful monarchs amassed wealth in gold and silver.

• Critics argue that poverty, inequality, and environmental degradation are inherent byproducts of the same capitalist mechanisms that drive innovation and wealth.
• The historical suffering of the poor during the Industrial Revolution led to the rise of socialist philosophy as an alternative to market-based societal organization.
• The production of affordable mass-market goods is identified as a primary contributor to environmental harm and social disparity.
• The 'degrowth' movement suggests that society must intentionally decrease economic production and consumption to mitigate environmental collapse.
• Proponents of sustainable development believe innovation, technology, and regulation can decouple economic growth from environmental damage.
• Global financial stability is increasingly measured through ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) standards to screen the ethical impact of investments.

The argument is that the same mechanism that produces wealth and innovation also creates poverty, inequality, and environmental crises.

• The text defines fundamental exchange rate mechanisms, including fixed, floating, and multilateral regimes that dictate currency values.
• It outlines the historical evolution of global trade through the GATT and the proposed but never established International Trade Organization.
• Key international institutions like the IMF and World Bank are highlighted for their roles in promoting financial stability and acting as knowledge hubs.
• Economic theories and historical events, such as mercantilism, laissez-faire, and the Great Depression, are contextualized within global finance.
• The section details post-war recovery efforts and development initiatives, specifically the Marshall Plan and the Millennium Development Goals.
• It identifies non-tariff barriers and oil shocks as significant disruptors to the flow of international trade and production.

laissez-faire free-market approach in which governments do not interfere in the market and let things take their own course

• The text defines essential economic concepts such as protectionist policies, subsidies, and tariff concessions that shape global trade dynamics.
• It outlines the roles of major international institutions including the World Bank, the IMF, and the World Trade Organization (WTO).
• Key financial mechanisms are explained, such as Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) and the Washington Consensus program for economic stability.
• The section introduces the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a set of 17 global objectives aimed at achieving a sustainable future by 2030.
• Review questions contrast mercantilist economic systems, which view wealth as finite, with Adam Smith’s theories on trade liberalization.
• The text identifies the three levels of analysis in International Political Economy (IPE) as individual, state, and system.

Enlightenment thinkers rejected the mercantilist idea that wealth is finite, proposing that wealth could in fact be created.

• The Bretton Woods Institutions were established to maintain global peace and economic prosperity, though the proposed International Trade Organization (ITO) was never created.
• Modernization theory explores the complex and debated causal link between economic growth and the development of democratic institutions.
• Exchange rate regimes vary between fixed systems and floating systems, where the latter's currency value is determined by market supply and demand.
• Historical responses to 19th-century inequality often shared a common focus on the social ownership of the means of production.
• Contemporary environmental discourse is primarily divided into two competing schools of thought: degrowth and sustainable development.

Modernization theory has clearly established a causal link between economic growth and democratic institutions.

• The references highlight the intersection of digital technology and governance, including social media censorship during elections and digital-first social assistance.
• Classic political theory is represented through citations of Aristotle and Harold Lasswell’s foundational definition of politics as 'who gets what, when, and how.'
• The text distinguishes political science from sociology by noting the latter's focus on social behaviors and institutions outside of formal government.
• Legal and institutional frameworks are explored through references to Robert’s Rules of Order, the brevity of world constitutions, and the duty of executives to obey court judgments.
• The role of international organizations is examined via the United Nations, specifically looking at both its humanitarian successes and its notable failures.

Harold Dwight Lasswell, Politics: Who Gets What, When, How (New York: P. Smith, 1950).

• The text provides a comprehensive list of citations covering the mechanisms of incumbency advantage and the role of money in elections.
• It highlights the philosophical ambiguity of governance, noting that the Australian government suggests the public interest should not be strictly defined.
• The references address the complexities of statehood, specifically mentioning the disputed status of entities like Taiwan and Palestine.
• Key political concepts such as sovereignty, authority, and the 'good citizen' are explored through various academic and encyclopedic entries.
• The citations track modern social challenges, including global political polarization and the racial implications of law enforcement.

In fact, the Australian government has stated that 'the public interest should not be defined.'

• The text consists of a comprehensive list of citations covering political science methodology, empirical theory, and biological foundations.
• Several sources focus on the integrity of the 2016 and 2020 U.S. elections, including reports on Russian interference and claims of election fraud.
• The references highlight the intersection of psychology and social issues, specifically regarding gun ownership and motivated reasoning.
• Data-driven analysis from outlets like FiveThirtyEight explores voter behavior, specifically addressing why younger Americans and minority groups participate in elections.
• Economic disparities are addressed through Federal Reserve reports on wealth gaps categorized by race and ethnicity.
• The section concludes with a focus on political behavior as a human phenomenon, moving from 'political hobbyism' to active engagement.

Trump Raises $495 Million since Mid-October, Including a Massive Haul Fueled by Misleading Appeals about Election Fraud.

• The text distinguishes between the traditional definition of politics—who gets what, when, and how—and the specific inquiry of 'who does what.'
• It references foundational human rights documents and philosophical frameworks, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the concept of unalienable rights.
• Major economic and social theories are cited, ranging from Hayek's critique of social justice to utilitarianism and cost-benefit analysis in public policy.
• The bibliography highlights the tension between libertarianism, as seen in the works of Robert Nozick, and the collective theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
• Contemporary applications of these theories are explored through modern examples like Kenyan national park tourism and the debate over gun ownership as a perceived threat.
• The section concludes with references to democratic socialism and John Rawls's influential 'A Theory of Justice' as frameworks for modern governance.

Harold Lasswell famously defined politics as “who gets what, when, how.” Our task in this section is somewhat different, as we are asking who does what.

• The text provides a comprehensive bibliography of key African American thinkers, including Booker T. Washington, W. E. B. Du Bois, and Ida B. Wells.
• It highlights the historical delay in American legislation, noting that lynching was not officially labeled a hate crime until 2018.
• The references bridge the gap between early 20th-century activism and modern investigative journalism through the Ida B. Wells Society.
• Global perspectives on justice are introduced through the works of Amartya Sen and studies on African social justice discourses.
• The concept of subsidiarity is defined as the delegation of governmental power to the smallest feasible local levels rather than national authorities.
• The citations explore the intersection of ethics, human rights, and the 'capabilities approach' to global justice as theorized by Martha Nussbaum.

Not until 2018 did the United States enact legislation labeling lynching as a hate crime.

• The text provides a comprehensive bibliography of foundational political philosophy, citing classic works by Hobbes, Locke, and Hume.
• It highlights contemporary feminist political theory and social justice research, specifically referencing the 'Women Also Know Stuff' initiative.
• The citations explore the psychological dimensions of politics, including authoritarianism, irrationality, and the social psychology of protest.
• A distinction is drawn between 'public spirit' and 'altruism,' defining the former as considering others' interests without necessarily sacrificing self-interest.
• The references cover global political challenges, including election interference in Latin America and the strategic goals of modern world leaders.

We use “public spirit” rather than “altruism” because altruism indicates an unselfish concern for the welfare of others, while public spirit simply states that the person considers the interests of others in making a decision.

• The text explores the biological basis of altruism, noting that brain scans show helping others activates the same pleasure centers as eating or sex.
• It contrasts the philosophical debate between determinism, which claims behavior is predictable, and the belief in free will or randomness.
• The references highlight the role of motivated reasoning and partisan influence in shaping public opinion and political behavior.
• A rational calculation model is presented for soldiers, weighing the risks of combat against the legal consequences of desertion.
• The section transitions into political ideology, specifically citing the economic collapse and human rights crisis in Venezuela.

There is evidence that altruistic behaviors light up the same “pleasure centers” that are activated when we eat chocolate or have sex.

• The text provides a comprehensive list of citations focusing on the economic decline of Venezuela, including data on poverty, GDP, and unemployment.
• It references classical political philosophy, specifically Aristotle’s theories on the middle constitution and the role of the middle class in a stable polity.
• Modern educational trends are linked to Aristotelian assumptions, suggesting a resurgence of his philosophy in contemporary policy debates.
• The citations highlight the shrinking of the American middle class as a significant sociological and political concern.
• The list includes foundational social contract theorists such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau to explore the origins of government and property rights.
• Contemporary political discourse is represented through references to public deliberation, voting rights, and the impact of school vouchers on national unity.

Educational theorist Kristján Kristjánsson points out that a sizable amount of advocacy for educational reform is “anchored firmly in Aristotelian assumptions” and represents, in fact, an “Aristotle-fueled trend” in educational policy.

• This section provides a comprehensive bibliographic list of foundational texts spanning the history of American democracy and European political philosophy.
• Key liberal and libertarian thinkers are represented, including John Stuart Mill's defense of liberty and F.A. Hayek's critique of central planning.
• The references trace the evolution of radical ideologies, citing primary works by Marx and Engels alongside scholarly analyses of Leninism, Stalinism, and Fascism.
• Modern geopolitical shifts are documented through citations on Chinese socialism, Xi Jinping Thought, and the rise of national revivalism.
• The list highlights the internal diversity of American political strategy, referencing social conservatism, center-left liberalism, and the 'new fusionism.'
• Legal and social debates are grounded in citations from Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan and contemporary discussions on gender and immigration.

Richard Steigmann-Gall, Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919–1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).

• The text consists of a detailed reference list documenting various political ideologies, including feminism, democratic socialism, and populism.
• Citations cover the evolution of feminism from Betty Friedan's 'The Feminine Mystique' to contemporary discussions on third and fourth waves.
• Economic policy debates are highlighted through sources discussing the federal minimum wage, Black farmers' debt cycles, and corporate social justice.
• The references include critiques of modern progressivism and the 'New American Right,' citing influential essays like 'The Flight 93 Election.'
• International political movements are represented through studies on Chavismo in Venezuela and the ideological frameworks of the United Nations.

See Michael Anton, “The Flight 93 Election,” Claremont Review of Books, September 5, 2016.

• The text provides a comprehensive list of citations regarding the historical and contemporary state of civil liberties and human rights globally.
• It highlights the tension between public health mandates and individual freedoms, specifically citing anti-mask protests in the United States and Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic.
• International frameworks for human rights are referenced, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, and the Arab Charter on Human Rights.
• A significant portion of the references focuses on the transition of South Africa from the apartheid era to a constitutional democracy with a robust Bill of Rights.
• The citations include data from global monitoring organizations like Freedom House and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace to track the status of freedom and protests worldwide.

Three Washington State Schools Put on Lockdown amid Anti-mask Protests.

• The text provides a comprehensive list of legal citations regarding the International Bill of Human Rights and common law constitutional frameworks.
• It contrasts the structural differences between written constitutions, like that of the United States, and unwritten constitutional traditions.
• Specific legal references highlight the tension between individual liberties, such as freedom of speech, and state-imposed mandates during public health crises.
• The citations include comparative constitutional law, specifically looking at the differing protections in Germany, China, and the United States.
• Legal precedents are cited to argue that democratic voters, rather than government commissions, should be the ultimate arbiters of political truth.

We do not want the Government (i.e., the Ohio Elections Commission) deciding what is political truth—for fear that the Government might persecute those who criticize it.

• The text provides a comprehensive list of legal citations and references concerning the right to privacy and individual liberties.
• Key U.S. Supreme Court cases such as Obergefell v. Hodges, Roe v. Wade, and Griswold v. Connecticut are cited as pillars of privacy and due process.
• It highlights the historical evolution of privacy rights, referencing the seminal 1890 Harvard Law Review article by Warren and Brandeis.
• The references extend to international human rights, including the UK Human Rights Act and United Nations mandates on privacy and child marriage.
• The documentation contrasts Western privacy protections with global human rights challenges, such as anti-LGBT laws in Africa and reproductive policies in China.

Samuel D . Warren and Louis D . Brandeis , “The Right to Privacy,” Harvard La w Review 4, no . 5 (Dec ember 15, 1890): 205.

• The text lists foundational US privacy laws including the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970 and the Privacy Act of 1974.
• It references international data protection standards such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
• Citations highlight the tension between state surveillance and privacy, specifically mentioning the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).
• The references document human rights concerns regarding China's use of big data for the repression of Xinjiang's Muslim population.
• Legal frameworks for balancing hate speech and free expression are noted, with a specific focus on Germany's strict post-WWII regulations.

“China: Big Da ta Program Targets Xinjiang ’s Muslims ,” Human Rights Watch, Dec ember 9, 2020.

• The text provides a comprehensive list of legal citations and reports concerning the suppression of free speech in Belarus and Saudi Arabia.
• It references the constitutional and judicial foundations of religious freedom in the United States, including the First Amendment and the Everson v. Board of Education case.
• The citations highlight global human rights issues, specifically the repression of Uyghurs in China and the evolving landscape of LGBTQ+ rights and conversion therapy laws.
• Legal precedents regarding the right to interstate travel in the United States are documented through various Supreme Court cases such as Saenz v. Roe and Shapiro v. Thompson.
• The references include international perspectives on freedom, citing the Swedish Constitution and reports from organizations like Freedom House and Amnesty International.

One current controversy in this area is conversion therapy, or intervention by religious practitioners intended to “cure” children of LGBTQ+ sexual orientations or gender identities.

• The text cites specific instances of state-controlled movement, such as the confiscation of passports from Uyghur populations in Xinjiang.
• International legal frameworks are referenced to define the status of refugees as individuals fleeing persecution, conflict, or generalized violence.
• The documentation highlights the increasing criminalization of illegal entry across various global jurisdictions.
• Academic and legal debates regarding 'open borders' are contrasted with the practical difficulties of immigrating to certain restrictive nations.
• Emerging legal discourse is connecting human rights obligations to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, and sustainable environment.
• The citations include landmark legal cases, such as Juliana v. United States, which address the intersection of government policy and environmental rights.

Xinjiang’s Government Gives Uyghurs Passports, Only to Take Them Away Later.

• The text cites legal challenges regarding climate change mitigation, specifically the Juliana v. United States case and its jurisdictional limits.
• It references the global expansion and shifting public support for the Black Lives Matter movement as a form of modern political participation.
• Historical foundations of democracy are explored through the works of James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville alongside modern student engagement studies.
• The citations cover the evolution of voting rights, including the 2020 U.S. voter turnout surge and the historical significance of women's suffrage in Wyoming.
• Indigenous self-government and the constitutional implications of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment are highlighted as key components of political identity.

Ninth Circuit Court Holds That Developing and Supervising Plan to Mitigate Anthropogenic Climate Change Would Exceed Remedial Powers of Article III Court.

• The text provides a comprehensive list of academic citations focusing on the factors that influence voter turnout across different nations.
• Key research themes include the impact of compulsory voting and electoral engineering on democratic participation.
• Several citations explore the role of social capital and community engagement, notably referencing Robert Putnam's 'Bowling Alone.'
• A significant portion of the references examines demographic variables, specifically how age and generational differences affect voting behavior.
• The bibliography highlights the relationship between economic inequality and political efficacy, suggesting that income gaps discourage participation.

The Relationship between Age and Turnout: A Roller-Coaster Ride.

• The text provides a comprehensive list of academic and journalistic citations focusing on global and domestic voter turnout trends.
• Significant attention is given to the shifting racial and ethnic demographics of the United States electorate, specifically highlighting Asian American, Pacific Islander, Black, and Latino voters.
• Multiple sources explore the persistent gender gap in voting, examining why women historically participate at higher rates than men and how this gap fluctuated in the 2020 election.
• The references address psychological and structural barriers to voting, including personality traits, voter fatigue, and the 'costs' associated with participating in elections.
• The collection emphasizes the 'unresolved dilemma' of unequal participation in democratic systems and the impact of registration laws worldwide.

Asian American and Pacific Islander Turnout Helped Hand Biden Georgia.

• The text provides a comprehensive list of citations focusing on the mechanics and barriers of American voter registration and turnout.
• Several sources examine the specific challenges faced by minority voters, including the historical legacy of segregation and lynching in the South.
• The references explore the role of civic institutions, such as religious organizations and volunteer groups, in fostering political engagement.
• Comparative analysis is offered between American political involvement and global engagement levels, noting the unique design of the U.S. Constitution.
• The citations cover the financial aspects of modern elections, specifically the rising influence and creative methods of small-dollar donors.

The Legacy of Black Lynching and Contemporary Segregation in the South.